IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3445-d520820.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Exposure and Acceptance Model of Appearance-Related Health Campaigns: Roles of Parents’ Healthy-Appearance Talk, Self-Objectification, and Interpersonal Conversations

Author

Listed:
  • Eunsoon Lee

    (Department of Media and Communication, Dong-A University, Busan 49236, Korea)

  • Gyu-il Lee

    (Department of Physical Education, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea)

Abstract

Excessive focus on appearance or lookism requires social attention as it can have negative consequences on individuals’ psychological and mental states related to health and sustainable social practice. As part of a healthy and sustainable social practice, this study tests the mechanism of enhancing appearance-related health campaign’s effectiveness through the O1-S-O2-R framework. Participants were 220 Korean college students with being 141 male and 78 female and they completed an on-line survey. The result of SEM analyses confirmed the O1-S-O2-R model. As the result of hypotheses testing, health campaign contents suggesting anti-lookism and diverse beauty standards have attracted the attention of people whose parents conversed using relatively less healthy-appearance talk when growing up and who had higher self-objectification scores with body surveillance and body shame. Interpersonal conversations and thoughts on the media content played a mediating role in the model, while health campaigns had a higher persuasive effect on campaign evaluation and the behavior intention of spreading the campaign’s content. Implications of the findings were discussed regarding health campaign designers and individuals, including parents, in education settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Eunsoon Lee & Gyu-il Lee, 2021. "Perceived Exposure and Acceptance Model of Appearance-Related Health Campaigns: Roles of Parents’ Healthy-Appearance Talk, Self-Objectification, and Interpersonal Conversations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3445-:d:520820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3445/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3445/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sukkyung You & Kyulee Shin, 2019. "Body Esteem among Korean Adolescent Boys and Girls," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Kennedy, Andrea K. & Schneiderman, Janet U. & Ramseyer Winter, Virginia, 2019. "Association of body weight perception and unhealthy weight control behaviors in adolescence," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 250-254.
    3. Farrelly, M.C. & Davis, K.C. & Haviland, M.L. & Messeri, P. & Healton, C.G., 2005. "Evidence of a dose-response relationship between "truth" antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(3), pages 425-431.
    4. Tom Kuhlman & John Farrington, 2010. "What is Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(11), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Siegel, M. & Biener, L., 2000. "The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progression to established smoking: Results of a longitudinal youth study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 90(3), pages 380-386.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David C. Colston & Yanmei Xie & James F. Thrasher & Sherry Emery & Megan E. Patrick & Andrea R. Titus & Michael R. Elliott & Nancy L. Fleischer, 2021. "Exploring How Exposure to Truth and State-Sponsored Anti-Tobacco Media Campaigns Affect Smoking Disparities among Young Adults Using a National Longitudinal Dataset, 2002–2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Lea Primožič & Andreja Kutnar, 2022. "Sustainability Communication in Global Consumer Brands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Oana Țugulea, 2017. "City Brand Personality—Relations with Dimensions and Dimensions Inter-Relations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Maria Iglesias-Mendoza & Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo & Sara Hadleigh-Dunn & Ashraf Labib, 2021. "Learning How to Learn from Disasters through a Comparative Dichotomy Analysis: Grenfell Tower and Hurricane Katrina Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Wenyu Zeng & Shiyong Wu & Wei Chen, 2023. "Studying at a New Remote University Campus: Challenges and Strategies in Students’ Sustainable Self-Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Per Engelseth & Remiguisz Kozlowski & Karolina Kamecka & Lukasz Gawinski & Richard Glavee-Geo, 2021. "Framing Sustainable Healthcare Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Ignacio Llanez-Caballero & Luis Ibarra & Angel Peña-Quintal & Glendy Catzín-Contreras & Pedro Ponce & Arturo Molina & Ricardo Ramirez-Mendoza, 2023. "The “Smart” Concept from an Electrical Sustainability Viewpoint," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Svatava Janoušková & Tomáš Hák & Bedřich Moldan, 2018. "Global SDGs Assessments: Helping or Confusing Indicators?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    9. Samar Ben Romdhane & Sang Lee & Salem Al-Shaebi, 2023. "Enhancing Sustainability Communication among UAE’s Higher Education Students: The Relationship between Sustainable Living Knowledge and Intention to Live Sustainably," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Pattarin Sanguankaew & Vichita Vathanophas Ractham, 2019. "Bibliometric Review of Research on Knowledge Management and Sustainability, 1994–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.
    11. Elizabeth C. Teixeira & Victor E. L. Silva & Nidia N. Fabré & Vandick S. Batista, 2020. "Marine shrimp fisheries research—a mismatch on spatial and thematic needs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 591-606, January.
    12. Juan Gabriel Martínez-Navalón & Vera Gelashvili & José Ramón Saura, 2020. "The Impact of Environmental Social Media Publications on User Satisfaction with and Trust in Tourism Businesses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Robert L. Oxley & Larry W. Mays & Alan Murray, 2016. "Optimization Model for the Sustainable Water Resource Management of River Basins," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(9), pages 3247-3264, July.
    14. Farboud Khatami & Erfan Goharian, 2022. "Beyond Profitable Shifts to Green Energies, towards Energy Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-28, April.
    15. repec:zbw:rwirep:0064 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Robert J. DiNapoli & Carl P. Lipo & Terry L. Hunt, 2021. "Triumph of the Commons: Sustainable Community Practices on Rapa Nui (Easter Island)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, November.
    17. Fidel Molina-Luque, 2020. "The Art of Living as a Community: Profiguration, Sustainability, and Social Development in Rapa Nui," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    18. Michela Faccioli & Nick Hanley & Catalina M. Torres Figuerola & Antoni Riera Font, 2015. "Do we care about sustainability? An analysis of time sensitivity of social preferences under environmental time-persistent effects," Discussion Papers in Environment and Development Economics 2015-17, University of St. Andrews, School of Geography and Sustainable Development.
    19. Ahteshamul Haq & Umar Muhammad Modibbo & Aquil Ahmed & Irfan Ali, 2022. "Mathematical modeling of sustainable development goals of India agenda 2030: a Neutrosophic programming approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11991-12018, October.
    20. Adam Sulich & Letycja Sołoducho-Pelc, 2021. "Renewable Energy Producers’ Strategies in the Visegrád Group Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    21. Juan Martín-Miguel & Camio Prado-Román & Gabriel Cachón-Rodríguez & Lilliana L. Avendaño-Miranda, 2020. "Determinants of Reputation at Private Graduate Online Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3445-:d:520820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.