IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13198-d690383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impacts of Socioeconomic Crisis in Portugal on Social Protection and Social Work Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Inês Casquilho-Martins

    (Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (CIES-Iscte), 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

The effects of the international crisis brought economic and financial risks, as well as consequences for human, social and sustainable development. This study aims to analyse the effects of social intervention with families since the 2008 crisis in Portugal. Through a qualitative approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with social workers (23), to identify the main impacts of the crisis and the adopted social intervention practices. We highlight a new increase in social problems and the growth of vulnerable groups facing an unprepared social protection system. The Portuguese case reveals that the effects of austerity have shown a decline in the welfare and benefits system, leading to worsened social problems, such as increased poverty and unemployment, as well as social inequalities. Social Work was required to respond to these consequences, although organisational contexts and austerity measures constrained practitioners’ autonomy. By reflecting on this critical period, we seek to contribute to better social protection and assistance models in the face of the current and future crisis. In this sense, Social Work practice ensures a means to guarantee fundamental rights and social justice, preparing social workers and social intervention for new challenges in crisis contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Inês Casquilho-Martins, 2021. "The Impacts of Socioeconomic Crisis in Portugal on Social Protection and Social Work Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13198-:d:690383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13198/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13198/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gennaro Zezza, 2012. "The impact of fiscal austerity in the Eurozone," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 1(0), pages 37-54.
    2. Isabel Novo-Corti & Diana-Mihaela Țîrcă & Magdalena Ziolo & Xose Picatoste, 2019. "Social Effects of Economic Crisis: Risk of Exclusion. An Overview of the European Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Rosella Carè & Riccardo De Lisa, 2019. "Social Impact Bonds for a Sustainable Welfare State: The Role of Enabling Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Yanis Varoufakis & Stuart Holland, 2012. "A modest proposal for resolving the Eurozone crisis," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 47(4), pages 240-247, July.
    5. Sofia A. Perez & Manos Matsaganis, 2018. "The Political Economy of Austerity in Southern Europe," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 192-207, March.
    6. Helena Belchior Rocha, 2018. "Social Work Practices and the Ecological Sustainability of Socially Vulnerable Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-27, April.
    7. Emilio Carnevali & Antoine Godin & Stefano Lucarelli & Marco Veronese Passarella, 2020. "Productivity growth, Smith effects and Ricardo effects in Euro Area's manufacturing industries," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 129-155, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paolo Pini, 2013. "Europe’s austerity budget for 2014-2020 and its rejection by the European Parliament. A short comment over an anti-Keynesian budget," Working Papers 2013142, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics.
    2. Karsten Kohler & Engelbert Stockhammer, 2022. "Growing differently? Financial cycles, austerity, and competitiveness in growth models since the Global Financial Crisis," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 1314-1341, July.
    3. Marta Silva & João Carlos Lopes, 2020. "The structural adjustment of the Portuguese economy in the context of the economic reform of the Eurozone," Working Papers REM 2020/0143, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    4. João Ferreira do Amaral & João Carlos Lopes, 2015. "The Trade-off Unemployment Rate/External Deficit: Assessing the Economic Adjustment Program of the Troika (European Commission, ECB and IMF) for Portugal using an Input-Output Approach," Working Papers Department of Economics 2015/04, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    5. Matteo Deleidi & Claudia Fontanari & Santiago José Gahn, 2023. "Autonomous demand and technical change: exploring the Kaldor–Verdoorn law on a global level," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(1), pages 57-80, April.
    6. Jörg Bibow, 2013. "Lost at Sea: The Euro Needs a Euro Treasury," IMK Studies 35-2013, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    7. Stefano Lucarelli & Gaetano Perone, 2020. "Quando la produttivitˆ limitata dalla bilancia dei pagamenti. Una riflessione sulle relazioni fra centro e periferia nellÕunione monetaria europea a partire dallÕequazione della produttivitˆ di Sylos ," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 73(292), pages 325-353.
    8. Giovanni Dosi & Marcello Minenna & Andrea Roventini & Roberto Violi, 2021. "Making the Eurozone work: a risk-sharing reform of the European Stability Mechanism," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 617-657, April.
    9. Justin Christopher Yang & Andres Roman-Urrestarazu & Carol Brayne, 2018. "Binge alcohol and substance use across birth cohorts and the global financial crisis in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, June.
    10. António Duarte Santos & Hélio Castro, 2022. "Housing and Setting Constraints: The Portuguese Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    11. Alessandro Caiani & Ermanno Catullo & Mauro Gallegati, 2018. "The effects of fiscal targets in a monetary union: a multi-country agent-based stock flow consistent model," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(6), pages 1123-1154.
    12. Begoña Aramayona & Valeria Guarneros-Meza, 2024. "The ‘In/formal Nocturnal City’: Updating a research agenda on nightlife studies from a Southern European perspective," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(3), pages 589-603, February.
    13. Carmen Díaz-Roldán, 2017. "Fiscal Performance in Monetary Unions: How Much Austerity Should Be Allowed?," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 64(1), pages 61-76, December.
    14. Fernando Bermejo & Raúl del Pozo & Pablo Moya, 2021. "Main Factors Determining the Economic Production Sustained by Public Long-Term Care Spending in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-18, August.
    15. Theofanis Exadaktylos & Nikolaos Zahariadis & Maria Mavrikou, 2023. "Reforms in Health Policy during the Greek Bailout: what makes reform successful and why?," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 188, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    16. Alexandre Gomes, 2020. "Regional economic growth in China from a Kaldorian perspective: A comparative study of Nanjing and Suzhou," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 73(295), pages 283-312.
    17. Massimo Amato & Luca Fantacci & Dimitri B. Papadimitriou & Gennaro Zezza, 2016. "Going Forward from B to A? Proposals for the Eurozone Crisis," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-14, August.
    18. Raquel Agost-Felip & María José Ruá & Fatiha Kouidmi, 2021. "An Inclusive Model for Assessing Age-Friendly Urban Environments in Vulnerable Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-29, July.
    19. Bulfone, Fabio, 2020. "The political economy of industrial policy in the European Union," MPIfG Discussion Paper 20/12, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    20. Markus P.A. Schneider & Stephen Kinsella & Antoine Godin, 2015. "Redistribution in the Age of Austerity: Evidence from Europe, 2006-13," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_856, Levy Economics Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13198-:d:690383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.