IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13132-d689102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Construct Dimensionality of Personal Energy at Work and Its Relationship with Health, Absenteeism and Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra F. J. Klijn

    (Department of Management and Organisation, School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Maria Tims

    (Department of Management and Organisation, School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Evgenia I. Lysova

    (Department of Management and Organisation, School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Svetlana N. Khapova

    (Department of Management and Organisation, School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Personal energy at work has become a popular topic among HRM scholars and practitioners because it has proven to impact performance. Based on the outcomes of previous research and the call for further exploration of the construct of personal energy at work, we executed this quantitative study. We explored the factor structure of the construct and its relationships with health and productivity by examining the construct that addresses four dimensions: physical, emotional, mental and spiritual energy. Data were collected from 256 employees in an international health tech company and used to analyze construct dimensionality and relationships with health, absenteeism and productivity. The results provided support for the four-dimensional structure of personal energy at work and show that the construct of personal energy at work is related to the outcomes of health, absenteeism and productivity. Implications for theory and practice, as well as directions for future research, are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra F. J. Klijn & Maria Tims & Evgenia I. Lysova & Svetlana N. Khapova, 2021. "Construct Dimensionality of Personal Energy at Work and Its Relationship with Health, Absenteeism and Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13132-:d:689102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13132/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13132/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghulam Abid & Shazaf Ijaz & Tahira Butt & Saira Farooqi & Maryam Rehmat, 2018. "Impact of perceived internal respect on flourishing: A sequential mediation of organizational identification and energy," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1507276-150, January.
    2. Yang Cai & Youming Song & Xia Xiao & Wendian Shi, 2020. "The Effect of Social Capital on Tacit Knowledge-Sharing Intention: The Mediating Role of Employee Vigor," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandra Francina Janneke Klijn & Maria Tims & Evgenia I. Lysova & Svetlana N. Khapova, 2021. "Personal Energy at Work: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-49, December.
    2. Abane, Albert Machistey & Mariwah, Simon & Owusu, Samuel Asiedu & Kasim, Adetayo & Robson, Elsbeth & Hampshire, Kate, 2021. "Mobile phone use and the welfare of community health nurses in Ghana: An analysis of unintended costs," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    3. Yongzhong Yang & Shuangji Liu & Xiaoting Song, 2023. "The Co-creation of Museum Experience Value From the Perspective of Visitor Motivation," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    4. Farhanah Fitria MUSTARI & Achmad GHAZALI, 2022. "Exploring Tacit Knowledge Sharing Enhancer Factors in Non- Profit Organizations Paper," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(1), pages 67-78, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13132-:d:689102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.