IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12613-d679641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting Heritability of Oil Palm Breeding Using Phenotypic Traits and Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Najihah Ahmad Latif

    (School of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Gelugor 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia)

  • Fatini Nadhirah Mohd Nain

    (School of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Gelugor 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia)

  • Nurul Hashimah Ahamed Hassain Malim

    (School of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Gelugor 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia)

  • Rosni Abdullah

    (School of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Gelugor 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia)

  • Muhammad Farid Abdul Rahim

    (FGV Research and Development (R&D) Sdn Bhd, Unit Biak Baka Sawit, Pusat Penyelidikan Pertanian Tun Razak, Jengka 26400, Pahang, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Nasruddin Mohamad

    (FGV Research and Development (R&D) Sdn Bhd, Unit Biak Baka Sawit, Pusat Penyelidikan Pertanian Tun Razak, Jengka 26400, Pahang, Malaysia)

  • Nurul Syafika Mohamad Fauzi

    (FGV Research and Development (R&D) Sdn Bhd, Unit Biak Baka Sawit, Pusat Penyelidikan Pertanian Tun Razak, Jengka 26400, Pahang, Malaysia)

Abstract

Oil palm is one of the main crops grown to help achieve sustainability in Malaysia. The selection of the best breeds will produce quality crops and increase crop yields. This study aimed to examine machine learning (ML) in oil palm breeding (OPB) using factors other than genetic data. A new conceptual framework to adopt the ML in OPB will be presented at the end of this paper. At first, data types, phenotype traits, current ML models, and evaluation technique will be identified through a literature survey. This study found that the phenotype and genotype data are widely used in oil palm breeding programs. The average bunch weight, bunch number, and fresh fruit bunch are the most important characteristics that can influence the genetic improvement of progenies. Although machine learning approaches have been applied to increase the productivity of the crop, most studies focus on molecular markers or genotypes for plant breeding, rather than on phenotype. Theoretically, the use of phenotypic data related to offspring should predict high breeding values by using ML. Therefore, a new ML conceptual framework to study the phenotype and progeny data of oil palm breeds will be discussed in relation to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Suggested Citation

  • Najihah Ahmad Latif & Fatini Nadhirah Mohd Nain & Nurul Hashimah Ahamed Hassain Malim & Rosni Abdullah & Muhammad Farid Abdul Rahim & Mohd Nasruddin Mohamad & Nurul Syafika Mohamad Fauzi, 2021. "Predicting Heritability of Oil Palm Breeding Using Phenotypic Traits and Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12613-:d:679641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12613/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12613/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meilina Ong-Abdullah & Jared M. Ordway & Nan Jiang & Siew-Eng Ooi & Sau-Yee Kok & Norashikin Sarpan & Nuraziyan Azimi & Ahmad Tarmizi Hashim & Zamzuri Ishak & Samsul Kamal Rosli & Fadila Ahmad Malike , 2015. "Loss of Karma transposon methylation underlies the mantled somaclonal variant of oil palm," Nature, Nature, vol. 525(7570), pages 533-537, September.
    2. Nuzhat Khan & Mohamad Anuar Kamaruddin & Usman Ullah Sheikh & Yusri Yusup & Muhammad Paend Bakht, 2021. "Oil Palm and Machine Learning: Reviewing One Decade of Ideas, Innovations, Applications, and Gaps," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Rajinder Singh & Eng-Ti Leslie Low & Leslie Cheng-Li Ooi & Meilina Ong-Abdullah & Ngoot-Chin Ting & Jayanthi Nagappan & Rajanaidu Nookiah & Mohd Din Amiruddin & Rozana Rosli & Mohamad Arif Abdul Manaf, 2013. "The oil palm SHELL gene controls oil yield and encodes a homologue of SEEDSTICK," Nature, Nature, vol. 500(7462), pages 340-344, August.
    4. Matthew J Page & Joanne E McKenzie & Patrick M Bossuyt & Isabelle Boutron & Tammy C Hoffmann & Cynthia D Mulrow & Larissa Shamseer & Jennifer M Tetzlaff & Elie A Akl & Sue E Brennan & Roger Chou & Jul, 2021. "The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boglárka Anna Éliás & Attila Jámbor, 2021. "Food Security and COVID-19: A Systematic Review of the First-Year Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Cala, Anggie & Maturana-Córdoba, Aymer & Soto-Verjel, Joseph, 2023. "Exploring the pretreatments' influence on pressure reverse osmosis: PRISMA review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Ming Shan & Yu-Shan Li & Bon-Gang Hwang & Jia-En Chua, 2021. "Productivity Metrics and Its Implementations in Construction Projects: A Case Study of Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Susca, T. & Zanghirella, F. & Colasuonno, L. & Del Fatto, V., 2022. "Effect of green wall installation on urban heat island and building energy use: A climate-informed systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Alexander P. L. Martindale & Benjamin Ng & Victoria Ngai & Aditya U. Kale & Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano & Robert M. Golub & Gary S. Collins & David Moher & Melissa D. McCradden & Lauren Oakden-Rayner , 2024. "Concordance of randomised controlled trials for artificial intelligence interventions with the CONSORT-AI reporting guidelines," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Gizéh Rangel-de Lázaro & Josep M. Duart, 2023. "You Can Handle, You Can Teach It: Systematic Review on the Use of Extended Reality and Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Online Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    7. Deniz Dutz & Ingrid Huitfeldt & Santiago Lacouture & Magne Mogstad & Alexander Torgovitsky & Winnie van Dijk, 2021. "Selection in Surveys," NBER Working Papers 29549, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
      • Deniz Dutz & Ingrid Huitfeldt & Santiago Lacouture & Magne Mogstad & Alexander Torgovitsky & Winnie van Dijk, 2021. "Selection in Surveys," Discussion Papers 971, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    8. Ellen Busink & Dana Kendzia & Fatih Kircelli & Sophie Boeger & Jovana Petrovic & Helen Smethurst & Stephen Mitchell & Christian Apel, 2023. "A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of renal replacement therapies, and consequences for decision-making in the end-stage renal disease treatment pathway," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(3), pages 377-392, April.
    9. Wang, Nan & Wang, Julian & Feng, Yanxiao, 2022. "Systematic review: Acute thermal effects of artificial light in the daytime," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    10. Tania Mateos-Blanco & Encarnación Sánchez‐Lissen & Inés Gil‐Jaurena & Clara Romero‐Pérez, 2022. "Child‐Led Participation: A Scoping Review of Empirical Studies," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 32-42.
    11. Elisa Mancinelli & Giulia Bassi & Silvia Gabrielli & Silvia Salcuni, 2022. "The Efficacy of Digital Cognitive–Behavioral Interventions in Supporting the Psychological Adjustment and Sleep Quality of Pregnant Women with Sub-Clinical Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Bei, Eva & Morrison, Val & Zarzycki, Mikołaj & Vilchinsky, Noa, 2023. "Barriers, facilitators, and motives to provide distance care, and the consequences for distance caregivers: A mixed-methods systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    13. Jacinda K. Dariotis & Frances R. Chen & Ye Rang Park & Montana K. Nowak & Katherine M. French & Anisa M. Codamon, 2023. "Parentification Vulnerability, Reactivity, Resilience, and Thriving: A Mixed Methods Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-66, June.
    14. Lippens, Louis & Vermeiren, Siel & Baert, Stijn, 2023. "The state of hiring discrimination: A meta-analysis of (almost) all recent correspondence experiments," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    15. Diana Martínez-Arteaga & Nolver Atanacio Arias Arias & Aquiles E. Darghan & Dursun Barrios, 2023. "Identification of Influential Factors in the Adoption of Irrigation Technologies through Neural Network Analysis: A Case Study with Oil Palm Growers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, April.
    16. Ahumada-Canale, Antonio & Jeet, Varinder & Bilgrami, Anam & Seil, Elizabeth & Gu, Yuanyuan & Cutler, Henry, 2023. "Barriers and facilitators to implementing priority setting and resource allocation tools in hospital decisions: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    17. Henrique Oliveira & Víctor Moutinho, 2021. "Renewable Energy, Economic Growth and Economic Development Nexus: A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    18. Tatiana Tucunduva Philippi Cortese & Jairo Filho Sousa de Almeida & Giseli Quirino Batista & José Eduardo Storopoli & Aaron Liu & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2022. "Understanding Sustainable Energy in the Context of Smart Cities: A PRISMA Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-38, March.
    19. Barbara Duffek & Andreas B. Eisingerich & Omar Merlo, 2023. "Why so toxic? A framework for exploring customer toxicity," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 122-143, June.
    20. Scott Claessens & Thanos Kyritsis & Quentin D. Atkinson, 2023. "Cross-national analyses require additional controls to account for the non-independence of nations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12613-:d:679641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.