IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12401-d675818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Slope Matters: Anti-Sprawl and Construction of Urban Nature in Yongin, South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Jewon Ryu

    (Korea Research Institute for Human Settlement, Sejong 30147, Korea)

  • Sang-Hyun Chi

    (Department of Geography, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea)

Abstract

Nature in urban areas is defined, recognised, and used by various actors, such as residents, politicians, construction industries, public officials, civic activists, and tourists. These actors engage in alliances and confrontations to construct urban nature as they imagine and want it. Existing research has shown the role of actors and the relationship between them. However, the position and the role of actors can change over the course of urban development as well. The history of development in Yongin shows the process of the political construction of urban nature by illustrating the conflict between development and the environment. From the late 1980s, large-scale apartment complexes have been built. Development ordinances have supported this incessant expansion of the city by easing regulations on the conversion of forest into residential areas. The result of accelerated expansion of the city without comprehensive urban planning of the city is called ‘the epitome of urban sprawl’. From the late 2010s, the orientation of city development began to change. The relaxed slope ordinance was restored to curb further development. This study explores the background of this amendment from the perspectives of urban political ecology. In order to examine how Yongin’s ‘nature’ was imagined and reconceptualised, we explore how the perception of nature is differentially constructed among various urban actors, especially residents from different districts. Next, we focus on the political strategies of urban actors who developed environmental conservation and public asset discourses from individualised and fragmented complaints. Through this process, this study explored how ‘unchecked urban sprawl’ is imagined, recognised, defined, and, more importantly, prevented. Additionally, the public support for the anti-sprawl shows that actors in urban politics change in the process of urban sprawl.

Suggested Citation

  • Jewon Ryu & Sang-Hyun Chi, 2021. "Slope Matters: Anti-Sprawl and Construction of Urban Nature in Yongin, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12401-:d:675818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12401/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12401/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James McCarthy, 2005. "Devolution in the Woods: Community Forestry as Hybrid Neoliberalism," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(6), pages 995-1014, June.
    2. Paul Robbins & Julie T. Sharp, 2003. "Producing and Consuming Chemicals: The Moral Economy of the American Lawn," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(4), pages 425-451, October.
    3. Lawrence Kitchen, 2013. "Are Trees Always ‘Good’? Urban Political Ecology and Environmental Justice in the Valleys of South Wales," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1968-1983, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheng, Jichuan & Qiu, Hong, 2018. "Governmentality within REDD+: Optimizing incentives and efforts to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 611-622.
    2. Paing, Win Min & Han, Phyu Phyu & Ota, Masahiko & Fujiwara, Takahiro, 2023. "The state-private hybrid forest policy in Myanmar: The impact of neoliberalism on the forestry sector after the 1990s," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Kate Driscoll Derickson, 2009. "Gendered, Material, and Partial Knowledges: A Feminist Critique of Neighborhood-Level Indicator Systems," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(4), pages 896-910, April.
    4. Daniel H. Mutibwa, 2022. "The (Un)Changing Political Economy of Arts, Cultural and Community Engagement, the Creative Economy and Place-Based Development during Austere Times," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Mikaela Schmitt-Harsh & Joseph A. Harsh, 2017. "Engaging nonscience majors in urban ecology: Recommendations for course design," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 550-561, December.
    6. Sarkki, Simo & Rönkä, Anna Reetta, 2012. "Neoliberalisations in Finnish forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 152-159.
    7. James Fraser & Joshua Theodore Bazuin & George Hornberger, 2016. "The privatization of neighborhood governance and the production of urban space," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(5), pages 844-870, May.
    8. Maier, Carolin & Abrams, Jesse B., 2018. "Navigating social forestry – A street-level perspective on National Forest management in the US Pacific Northwest," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 432-441.
    9. Abrams, Jesse, 2019. "The emergence of network governance in U.S. National Forest Administration: Causal factors and propositions for future research," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Tiffany H. Morrison & W. Neil Adger & Katrina Brown & Maria Carmen Lemos & Dave Huitema & Terry P. Hughes, 2017. "Mitigation and adaptation in polycentric systems: sources of power in the pursuit of collective goals," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(5), September.
    11. Dressler, Wolfram & Roth, Robin, 2011. "The Good, the Bad, and the Contradictory: Neoliberal Conservation Governance in Rural Southeast Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 851-862, May.
    12. Marien González-Hidalgo & Iago Otero & Giorgos Kallis, 2014. "Seeing beyond the Smoke: The Political Ecology of Fire in Horta de Sant Joan (Catalonia)," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(5), pages 1014-1031, May.
    13. Khachatryan, Hayk & Zhou, Guzhen, 2014. "Preferences for Sustainable Lawn Care Practices: The Choice of Lawn Fertilizers," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170210, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Carl J Griffin, 2010. "Becoming Private Property: Custom, Law, and the Geographies of ‘Ownership’ in 18th- and 19th-Century England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(3), pages 747-762, March.
    15. Belsky, Jill M., 2015. "Community forestry engagement with market forces: A comparative perspective from Bhutan and Montana," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 29-36.
    16. Noel Castree, 2008. "Neoliberalising Nature: Processes, Effects, and Evaluations," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(1), pages 153-173, January.
    17. Sahide, Muhammad Alif K. & Fisher, Micah R. & Erbaugh, J.T. & Intarini, Dian & Dharmiasih, Wiwik & Makmur, Muliadi & Faturachmat, Fatwa & Verheijen, Bart & Maryudi, Ahmad, 2020. "The boom of social forestry policy and the bust of social forests in Indonesia: Developing and applying an access-exclusion framework to assess policy outcomes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    18. Theresa Selfa & Joanna Endter-Wada, 2008. "The Politics of Community-Based Conservation in Natural Resource Management: A Focus for International Comparative Analysis," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(4), pages 948-965, April.
    19. Behrsin, Ingrid & Benner, Chris, 2017. "Contested spaces and subjectivities of transit: Political ecology of a bus rapid transit development in Oakland, California," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 95-103.
    20. Eero Palmujoki & Pekka Virtanen, 2016. "Global, National, or Market? Emerging REDD+ Governance Practices in Mozambique and Tanzania," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 16(1), pages 59-78, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12401-:d:675818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.