IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p10772-d645242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Significance and Vision of Nutrient Recovery for Sustainable City Food Systems in Germany by 2050

Author

Listed:
  • Volkmar Keuter

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety and Energy Technologies UMSICHT, 46047 Oberhausen, Germany)

  • Sebastian Deck

    (Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Applied Science Osnabrueck, 49090 Osnabrueck, Germany)

  • Heidi Giesenkamp

    (Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Applied Science Osnabrueck, 49090 Osnabrueck, Germany)

  • Denise Gonglach

    (Department of Political Science, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35394 Giessen, Germany)

  • Victor Takazi Katayama

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety and Energy Technologies UMSICHT, 46047 Oberhausen, Germany)

  • Sica Liesegang

    (Institute of Water Infrastructure Resources, Technical University Kaiserslautern, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany)

  • Finn Petersen

    (Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Applied Science Osnabrueck, 49090 Osnabrueck, Germany)

  • Sandra Schwindenhammer

    (Department of Political Science, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35394 Giessen, Germany)

  • Heidrun Steinmetz

    (Institute of Water Infrastructure Resources, Technical University Kaiserslautern, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany)

  • Andreas Ulbrich

    (Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Applied Science Osnabrueck, 49090 Osnabrueck, Germany)

Abstract

Within this paper, the authors explain their transdisciplinary vision of nutrient recovery for sustainable urban plant cultivation in Germany from different but complementary perspectives (SUSKULT vision). Nowadays, the demand for fresh, healthy, locally and sustainably produced food in German urban areas is constantly increasing. At the same time, current agricultural systems contribute significantly to exceeding the planetary boundaries. The disruption of the phosphorus and nitrogen cycles in particular stands out from the manifold effects of modern food production on the Earth system. One central issue that will have to be faced in the future is how increased yields in agriculture will be achieved with high-energy requirements in fertilizer production and pollution of water and soil by phosphorus and reactive nitrogen. City region food systems (CRFS) can be a solution to overcome these issues. Nevertheless, to ensure sustainable CRFS, innovative technologies and methods need to be developed, including nutrient and energy recovery and adapted horticultural cultivation methods that fit complex urban dynamics. Such new strategies need to be integrated in long-term social and political transformation processes to enhance acceptance of food produced by recyclates. The joint contribution of experts from the wastewater, horticultural, and political sciences, together with industrial and societal sector actors, is critical to reach these objectives. The overarching goal of SUSKULT’s vision is the establishment of the field of urban circular agricultural production as an innovative sector of the bio-based economy in Germany.

Suggested Citation

  • Volkmar Keuter & Sebastian Deck & Heidi Giesenkamp & Denise Gonglach & Victor Takazi Katayama & Sica Liesegang & Finn Petersen & Sandra Schwindenhammer & Heidrun Steinmetz & Andreas Ulbrich, 2021. "Significance and Vision of Nutrient Recovery for Sustainable City Food Systems in Germany by 2050," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10772-:d:645242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10772/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10772/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paula Fernandez-Wulff, 2019. "Collective Agency in the Making: How Social Innovations in the Food System Practice Democracy beyond Consumption," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 81-93.
    2. Kristin Jürkenbeck & Andreas Heumann & Achim Spiller, 2019. "Sustainability Matters: Consumer Acceptance of Different Vertical Farming Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Marielle Dubbeling & Guido Santini & Henk Renting & Makiko Taguchi & Louison Lançon & Juan Zuluaga & Luca De Paoli & Alexandra Rodriguez & Verónica Andino, 2017. "Assessing and Planning Sustainable City Region Food Systems: Insights from Two Latin American Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Sandra Schwindenhammer & Denise Gonglach, 2021. "SDG Implementation through Technology? Governing Food-Water-Technology Nexus Challenges in Urban Agriculture," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 176-186.
    5. Ortwin Renn & Andreas Klinke, 2013. "A Framework of Adaptive Risk Governance for Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Noël van Dooren & Brecht Leseman & Suzanne van der Meulen, 2021. "How New Food Networks Change the Urban Environment: A Case Study in the Contribution of Sustainable, Regional Food Systems to Green and Healthy Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Simon Goess & Martin de Jong & Evert Meijers, 2016. "City branding in polycentric urban regions: identification, profiling and transformation in the Randstad and Rhine-Ruhr," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(11), pages 2036-2056, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Livia Marchetti & Valentina Cattivelli & Claudia Cocozza & Fabio Salbitano & Marco Marchetti, 2020. "Beyond Sustainability in Food Systems: Perspectives from Agroecology and Social Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Yiming Shao & Zhugen Wang & Zhiwei Zhou & Haojing Chen & Yuanlong Cui & Zhenghuan Zhou, 2022. "Determinants Affecting Public Intention to Use Micro-Vertical Farming: A Survey Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Thomas Neise & Javier Revilla Diez & Matthias Garschagen, 2018. "Firms as drivers of integrative adaptive regional development in the context of environmental hazards in developing countries and emerging economies – A conceptual framework," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(8), pages 1522-1541, December.
    4. Garrett M. Broad & Wythe Marschall & Maya Ezzeddine, 2022. "Perceptions of high-tech controlled environment agriculture among local food consumers: using interviews to explore sense-making and connections to good food," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 417-433, March.
    5. Hemeng Zhou & Kathrin Specht & Caitlin K. Kirby, 2022. "Consumers’ and Stakeholders’ Acceptance of Indoor Agritecture in Shanghai (China)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, February.
    6. Simon Berner & Hartmut Derler & René Rehorska & Stephan Pabst & Ulrike Seebacher, 2019. "Roadmapping to Enhance Local Food Supply: Case Study of a City-Region in Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Marini, Michele & Caro, Dario & Thomsen, Marianne, 2023. "Investigating local policy instruments for different types of urban agriculture in four European cities: A case study analysis on the use and effectiveness of the applied policy instruments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    8. Basil Bornemann & Sabine Weiland, 2019. "Editorial: New Perspectives on Food Democracy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 1-7.
    9. Yanwei Li & Araz Taeihagh & Martin de Jong & Andreas Klinke, 2021. "Toward a Commonly Shared Public Policy Perspective for Analyzing Risk Coping Strategies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 519-532, March.
    10. Ramazan Çakmakçı & Mehmet Ali Salık & Songül Çakmakçı, 2023. "Assessment and Principles of Environmentally Sustainable Food and Agriculture Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, May.
    11. Ana Moragues-Faus & Alizée Marceau, 2018. "Measuring Progress in Sustainable Food Cities: An Indicators Toolbox for Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Vibhas Sukhwani & Arie Nurzaman & Nadia Paramitha Kusumawardhani & Anwaar Mohammed AlHinai & Liu Hanyu & Rajib Shaw, 2019. "Enhancing Food Security by Institutionalizing Collaborative Food Alliances in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Macht, Janine & Klink-Lehmann, Jeanette & Hartmann, Monika, 2023. "Don't forget the locals: Understanding citizens' acceptance of bio-based technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Philip Harrison, 2021. "Sustainability in City-Regionalism as Emergent Practice: The Case of the BRICS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Huijie Li & Jie Li, 2021. "Risk Governance and Sustainability: A Scientometric Analysis and Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    16. Jean Philippe Décieux, 2021. "The Dialectic of Transnational Integration and National Disintegration as Challenge for Multilevel Governance," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, July.
    17. Aogán Delaney & Tom Evans & John McGreevy & Jordan Blekking & Tyler Schlachter & Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki & Peter A. Tamás & Todd A. Crane & Hallie Eakin & Wiebke Förch & Lindsey Jones & Donald R. Nelson , 2018. "Governance of food systems across scales in times of social-ecological change: a review of indicators," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(2), pages 287-310, April.
    18. Derk Jan Stobbelaar & Wim van der Knaap & Joop Spijker, 2022. "Transformation towards Green Cities: Key Conditions to Accelerate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
    19. Aleksander Grzelak & Jakub Staniszewski & Michał Borychowski, 2020. "Income or Assets—What Determines the Approach to the Environment among Farmers in A Region in Poland?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Ashish K. Rathore & Arpan K. Kar & P. Vigneswara Ilavarasan, 2017. "Social Media Analytics: Literature Review and Directions for Future Research," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 229-249, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10772-:d:645242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.