IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i19p10599-d642453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lean Manufacturing Tools Applied to Material Flow and Their Impact on Economic Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Manufacturing, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez 32310, Chihuahua, Mexico
    Department of Industrial Engineering, Tecnológico Nacional de Mexico/I.T. Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez 32500, Chihuahua, Mexico)

  • José Roberto Díaz Reza

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Tecnológico Nacional de Mexico/I.T. Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez 32500, Chihuahua, Mexico)

  • Cuauhtémoc Sánchez Ramírez

    (Division of Research and Postgraduate Studies, Tecnológico Nacional de Mexico/Instituto Tecnológico de Orizaba, Orizaba 94320, Veracruz, Mexico)

  • Jorge Limón Romero

    (Faculty of Engineering, Desing and Architecture, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California—Campus Ensenada, Ensenada 22860, Baja California, Mexico)

  • Emilio Jiménez Macías

    (Department of Electric Engineering, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, La Rioja, Spain)

  • Carlos Javierre Lardies

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Aragon, Spain)

  • Manuel Arnoldo Rodríguez Medina

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Tecnológico Nacional de Mexico/I.T. Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez 32500, Chihuahua, Mexico)

Abstract

This paper presents a second-order structural equation model that analyzes three lean manufacturing tools associated with material flow, such as 5S, SMED, and continuous flow related to economic sustainability. The variables relate to each other through six hypotheses, tested with 169 responses to a questionnaire applied to the Mexican maquiladora industry, using the partial least squares technique and 95% confidence to estimate direct, the sum of indirect, and total effects. In addition, an analysis with conditional probabilities appears to determine how low and high implementation levels in independent variables affect the dependent variables’ occurrence. Findings indicate that 5S is a lean manufacturing tool with the most increased direct effects on SMED and continuous flow. Additionally, values indicate that SMED is essential to maintain continuous flow in production lines and is vital for economic sustainability due to the time reduction in setup.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & José Roberto Díaz Reza & Cuauhtémoc Sánchez Ramírez & Jorge Limón Romero & Emilio Jiménez Macías & Carlos Javierre Lardies & Manuel Arnoldo Rodríguez Medina, 2021. "Lean Manufacturing Tools Applied to Material Flow and Their Impact on Economic Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10599-:d:642453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10599/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/19/10599/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariano Jiménez & Luis Romero & Jon Fernández & María del Mar Espinosa & Manuel Domínguez, 2019. "Extension of the Lean 5S Methodology to 6S with An Additional Layer to Ensure Occupational Safety and Health Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. José Roberto Díaz-Reza & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & Valeria Martínez-Loya & Julio Blanco-Fernández & Emilio Jiménez-Macías & Liliana Avelar-Sosa, 2016. "The Effect of SMED on Benefits Gained in Maquiladora Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, November.
    3. José Roberto Díaz-Reza & Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & José Roberto Mendoza-Fong & Valeria Martínez-Loya & Emilio Jiménez Macías & Julio Blanco-Fernández, 2017. "Interrelations among SMED Stages: A Causal Model," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-10, August.
    4. Leonilde Varela & Adriana Araújo & Paulo Ávila & Hélio Castro & Goran Putnik, 2019. "Evaluation of the Relation between Lean Manufacturing, Industry 4.0, and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Prabir Kumar Bandyopadhyay & Sandeep Naik & Kunal K. Ganguly, 2015. "Reduction of Setup Time through SMED Approach: A Case Study in the Pharmaceutical Industry," International Journal of Applied Management Sciences and Engineering (IJAMSE), IGI Global, vol. 2(2), pages 20-32, July.
    6. Barbara Aquilani & Cecilia Silvestri & Alessandro Ruggieri, 2016. "Sustainability, TQM and Value Co-Creation Processes: The Role of Critical Success Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Hadjimarcou, John & Brouthers, Lance E. & McNicol, Jason P. & Michie, Donald E., 2013. "Maquiladoras in the 21st century: Six strategies for success," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 207-217.
    8. Chunguang Bai & Ahmet Satir & Joseph Sarkis, 2019. "Investing in lean manufacturing practices: an environmental and operational perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(4), pages 1037-1051, February.
    9. Yang, Ma Ga (Mark) & Hong, Paul & Modi, Sachin B., 2011. "Impact of lean manufacturing and environmental management on business performance: An empirical study of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 251-261, February.
    10. Sidra Ramzan & Chenguang Liu & Yan Xu & Hina Munir & Bhumika Gupta, 2020. "The adoption of online e-waste collection platform to improve environmental sustainability: an empirical study of Chinese millennials," Post-Print hal-02560190, HAL.
    11. Arashdeep Singh & Inderpreet Singh Ahuja, 2015. "Review of 5S methodology and its contributions towards manufacturing performance," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(4), pages 408-424.
    12. Poorya Ghafoorpoor Yazdi & Aydin Azizi & Majid Hashemipour, 2018. "An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Overall Equipment Efficiency (OEE) and Manufacturing Sustainability in Industry 4.0 with Time Study Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-28, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kleber F. Barcia & Lizzi Garcia-Castro & Jorge Abad-Moran, 2022. "Lean Six Sigma Impact Analysis on Sustainability Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jon Fernández Carrera & Alfredo Amor del Olmo & María Romero Cuadrado & María del Mar Espinosa Escudero & Luis Romero Cuadrado, 2021. "From Lean 5S to 7S Methodology Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Piccarozzi, Michela & Silvestri, Cecilia & Aquilani, Barbara & Silvestri, Luca, 2022. "Is this a new story of the ‘Two Giants’? A systematic literature review of the relationship between industry 4.0, sustainability and its pillars," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    3. Erlantz Allur & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Olivier Boiral & Francesco Testa, 2018. "Quality and Environmental Management Linkage: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Jaroslav Vrchota & Martin Pech & Ladislav Rolínek & Jiří Bednář, 2020. "Sustainability Outcomes of Green Processes in Relation to Industry 4.0 in Manufacturing: Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-47, July.
    5. Kleber F. Barcia & Lizzi Garcia-Castro & Jorge Abad-Moran, 2022. "Lean Six Sigma Impact Analysis on Sustainability Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Pedro Teixeira & Arnaldo Coelho & Pedro Fontoura & José Carlos Sá & Francisco J. G. Silva & Gilberto Santos & Luis P. Ferreira, 2022. "Combining lean and green practices to achieve a superior performance: The contribution for a sustainable development and competitiveness—An empirical study on the Portuguese context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 887-903, July.
    7. Jorge Luis García Alcaraz & Adrián Salvador Morales García & José Roberto Díaz Reza & Julio Blanco Fernández & Emilio Jiménez Macías & Rita Puig i Vidal, 2022. "Machinery Lean Manufacturing Tools for Improved Sustainability: The Mexican Maquiladora Industry Experience," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Hazem Ali & Ting Chen & Yunhong Hao, 2021. "Sustainable Manufacturing Practices, Competitive Capabilities, and Sustainable Performance: Moderating Role of Environmental Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Catherine Maware & David M. Parsley, 2022. "The Challenges of Lean Transformation and Implementation in the Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Elena Stefana & Paola Cocca & Filippo Marciano & Diana Rossi & Giuseppe Tomasoni, 2019. "A Review of Energy and Environmental Management Practices in Cast Iron Foundries to Increase Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Bertha Leticia Treviño-Elizondo & Heriberto García-Reyes & Rodrigo E. Peimbert-García, 2023. "A Maturity Model to Become a Smart Organization Based on Lean and Industry 4.0 Synergy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Petra Andries & Ute Stephan, 2019. "Environmental Innovation and Firm Performance: How Firm Size and Motives Matter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Wang, Zhen & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Liu, Chang, 2015. "Composite sustainable manufacturing practice and performance framework: Chinese auto-parts suppliers׳ perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 219-233.
    14. ÄŒreÅ¡nar, Rok & Nedelko, Zlatko, 2019. "Competencies as a Criterion for Assessing the Readiness of Organizations for Industry 4.0 - A Missing Dimension," Proceedings- 11th International Conference on Mangement, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2019),, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    15. Miro Hegedić & Mihael Gudlin & Matija Golec & Nataša Tošanović, 2024. "Lean and Green Decision Model for Lean Tools Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-34, January.
    16. Fatoki Olawale, 2018. "Environmental Sustainability Practices of Immigrant-Owned Small and Medium Enterprises in South Africa," European Review of Applied Sociology, Sciendo, vol. 11(17), pages 27-43, December.
    17. Lai, Kee-hung & Wong, Christina W.Y. & Venus Lun, Y.H., 2014. "The role of customer integration in extended producer responsibility: A study of Chinese export manufacturers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 284-293.
    18. Hong, Paul & Jagani, Sandeep & Kim, Jinhwan & Youn, Sun Hee, 2019. "Managing sustainability orientation: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 71-81.
    19. Andrea Bazzoli & Matteo Curcuruto & James I. Morgan & Margherita Brondino & Margherita Pasini, 2020. "Speaking Up about Workplace Safety: An Experimental Study on Safety Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Xie, Jinhua & Yang, Gangqiao & Wang, Ge & Song, Yan & Yang, Fan, 2021. "How do different rural-land-consolidation modes shape farmers’ ecological production behaviors?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:19:p:10599-:d:642453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.