IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i13p7225-d583819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Cross-Border Cultural Tourism as an Indicator of Territorial Integration across the Slovak–Hungarian Border

Author

Listed:
  • Tamás Hardi

    (Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Institute for Regional Studies, Liszt Ferenc u. 10, 9022 Győr, Hungary
    Regional Science and Public Policy, Széchenyi István University, Egyetem tér 1, 9022 Győr, Hungary)

  • Marcell Kupi

    (Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Institute for Regional Studies, Liszt Ferenc u. 10, 9022 Győr, Hungary
    Doctoral School of Regional and Business Administration Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Egyetem tér 1, 9022 Győr, Hungary)

  • Gyula Ocskay

    (Central European Service for Cross-Border Initiatives, Újpest Rakpart 5. III/12a, 1137 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Eszter Szemerédi

    (Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Institute for Regional Studies, Liszt Ferenc u. 10, 9022 Győr, Hungary
    Doctoral School of Regional and Business Administration Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Egyetem tér 1, 9022 Győr, Hungary)

Abstract

There are numerous examples of cross-border regions in Europe, which are regions not properly demarcated by national borders. One of the main driving forces of the European Union is to turn the dividing borders into connecting borders by strengthening the cohesion between states and regions, thus, encouraging regions to remedy the existing ethnic and cultural fragmentation by increasing the intensity and number of cross-border contacts. Our research focuses on proving that, in symbolic places, such as the cross-border area of Komárom and Komárno, the cultural values, monuments, and heritage sites are the strongest attraction factors for nationality-based cultural tourism. To support our hypothesis, we conducted an empirical survey within the framework of the H2020 SPOT (Social and Innovative Platform on Cultural Tourism and its potential towards deepening Europeanisation) in the cross-border region of Komárom and Komárno. The evaluation concentrated on four aspects of cultural tourism: the nature of cultural tourism in the area, the resident and visitor perceptions of the cultural tourism offerings, opportunities to increase cross-border collaboration, and options to improve the cultural tourism offerings of the area. Our results show that, although there is a great potential in the cross-border tourist destination of Komárom–Komárno, the integration of the (once united) two towns is advancing very slowly, which can be witnessed in the weaknesses of tourism integration as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamás Hardi & Marcell Kupi & Gyula Ocskay & Eszter Szemerédi, 2021. "Examining Cross-Border Cultural Tourism as an Indicator of Territorial Integration across the Slovak–Hungarian Border," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7225-:d:583819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7225/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7225/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blaive, Muriel & Oates-Indruchová, Libora, 2013. "Komárno: A Flagship of Symbolic Politics at the Slovak-Hungarian Border," Revue d'études comparatives Est-Ouest, Editions NecPlus, vol. 44(04), pages 93-121, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7225-:d:583819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.