IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i13p7108-d581664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Approached Based on T-Spherical Fuzzy Schweizer-Sklar Power Heronian Mean Operator for Evaluating Water Reuse Applications under Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Qaisar Khan

    (Department of Pure and Applied Mathematics, University of Haripur, Haripur 22620, KPK, Pakistan)

  • Jeonghwan Gwak

    (Department of Software, Korea National University of Transportation, Chungju 27469, Korea
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, Chungju 27469, Korea
    Department of AI Robotics Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, Chungju 27469, Korea
    Department of IT & Energy Convergence (BK21 FOUR), Korea National University of Transportation, Chungju 27469, Korea)

  • Muhammad Shahzad

    (Department of Pure and Applied Mathematics, University of Haripur, Haripur 22620, KPK, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Kamran Alam

    (Department of Pure and Applied Mathematics, University of Haripur, Haripur 22620, KPK, Pakistan)

Abstract

The T-Spherical Fuzzy set (T-SPHFS) is one of the core simplifications of quite a lot of fuzzy concepts such as fuzzy set (FS), intuitionistic fuzzy set (ITFS), picture fuzzy set (PIFS), Q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (Q-RUOFS), etc. T-SPHFS reveals fuzzy judgment by the degree of positive membership, degree of abstinence, degree of negative membership, and degree of refusal with relaxed conditions, and this is a more powerful mathematical tool to pair with inconsistent, indecisive, and indistinguishable information. In this article, several novel operational laws for T-SPFNs based on the Schweizer–Sklar t-norm (SSTN) and the Schweizer–Sklar t-conorm (SSTCN) are initiated, and some desirable characteristics of these operational laws are investigated. Further, maintaining the dominance of the power aggregation (POA) operators that confiscate the ramifications of the inappropriate data and Heronian mean (HEM) operators that consider the interrelationship among the input information being aggregated, we intend to focus on the T-Spherical fuzzy Schweizer–Sklar power Heronian mean (T-SPHFSSPHEM) operator, the T-Spherical fuzzy Schweizer–Sklar power geometric Heronian mean (T-SPHFSSPGHEM) operator, the T-Spherical fuzzy Schweizer–Sklar power weighted Heronian mean (T-SPHFSSPWHEM) operator, the T-Spherical fuzzy Schweizer–Sklar power weighted geometric Heronian mean (T-SPHFSSPWGHEM) operator, and their core properties and exceptional cases in connection with the parameters. Additionally, deployed on these newly initiated aggregation operators (AOs), a novel multiple attribute decision making (MADM) model is proposed. Then, the initiated model is applied to the City of Penticton (British Columbia, Canada) to select the best choice among the accessible seven water reuse choices to manifest the practicality and potency of the preferred model and a comparison with the proffered models is also particularized.

Suggested Citation

  • Qaisar Khan & Jeonghwan Gwak & Muhammad Shahzad & Muhammad Kamran Alam, 2021. "A Novel Approached Based on T-Spherical Fuzzy Schweizer-Sklar Power Heronian Mean Operator for Evaluating Water Reuse Applications under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-35, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7108-:d:581664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7108/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7108/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nagarajan, D. & Lathamaheswari, M. & Broumi, Said & Kavikumar, J., 2019. "A new perspective on traffic control management using triangular interval type-2 fuzzy sets and interval neutrosophic sets," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    2. Xu-Hui Li & Lin Huang & Qiang Li & Hu-Chen Liu, 2020. "Passenger Satisfaction Evaluation of Public Transportation Using Pythagorean Fuzzy MULTIMOORA Method under Large Group Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Luis Pérez-Dominguez & Sara-Nohemí Almeraz Durán & Roberto Romero López & Iván Juan Carlos Pérez-Olguin & David Luviano-Cruz & Jesús Andrés Hernández Gómez, 2021. "Assessment Urban Transport Service and Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets CODAS Method: A Case of Study of Ciudad Juárez," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Peide Liu & Yumei Wang, 2019. "Intuitionistic Fuzzy Interaction Hamy Mean Operators and Their Application to Multi-attribute Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 197-232, February.
    5. Ming-Lang Tseng & Phan Anh Tan & Shiou-Yun Jeng & Chun-Wei Remen Lin & Yeneneh Tamirat Negash & Susilo Nur Aji Cokro Darsono, 2019. "Sustainable Investment: Interrelated among Corporate Governance, Economic Performance and Market Risks Using Investor Preference Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Peide Liu & Peng Wang, 2018. "Some interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Schweizer–Sklar power aggregation operators and their application to supplier selection," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 1188-1211, April.
    7. Rana Muhammad Zulqarnain & Xiao Long Xin & Imran Siddique & Waseem Asghar Khan & Mogtaba Ahmed Yousif, 2021. "TOPSIS Method Based on Correlation Coefficient under Pythagorean Fuzzy Soft Environment and Its Application towards Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Patchara Phochanikorn & Chunqiao Tan, 2019. "A New Extension to a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection under an Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Stekelorum, Rebecca & Laguir, Issam & Gupta, Shivam & Kumar, Sameer, 2021. "Green supply chain management practices and third-party logistics providers’ performances: A fuzzy-set approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Areeba Naseem & Kifayat Ullah & Maria Akram & Darko Božanić & Goran Ćirović, 2022. "Assessment of Smart Grid Systems for Electricity Using Power Maclaurin Symmetric Mean Operators Based on T-Spherical Fuzzy Information," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Wei Yang & Yongfeng Pang, 2022. "T-Spherical Fuzzy Bonferroni Mean Operators and Their Application in Multiple Attribute Decision Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-33, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Preeti Sharma & Priyanka Panday & R. C. Dangwal, 2020. "Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: a study of Indian companies," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(4), pages 208-217, December.
    2. Inese Mavlutova & Andris Fomins & Aivars Spilbergs & Dzintra Atstaja & Janis Brizga, 2021. "Opportunities to Increase Financial Well-Being by Investing in Environmental, Social and Governance with Respect to Improving Financial Literacy under COVID-19: The Case of Latvia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Xiao-Guang Yue & Yan Han & Deimante Teresiene & Justina Merkyte & Wei Liu, 2020. "Sustainable Funds’ Performance Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Pratibha Rani & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Abbas Mardani & Fausto Cavallaro & Dalia Štreimikienė & Syed Abdul Rehman Khan, 2020. "Pythagorean Fuzzy SWARA–VIKOR Framework for Performance Evaluation of Solar Panel Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Shouzhen Zeng & Dandan Luo & Chonghui Zhang & Xingsen Li, 2020. "A Correlation-Based TOPSIS Method for Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Single-Valued Neutrosophic Information," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 343-358, February.
    6. Pingtao Yi & Qiankun Dong & Weiwei Li, 2021. "A family of IOWA operators with reliability measurement under interval-valued group decision-making environment," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 483-505, June.
    7. Koray Altintas & Ozalp Vayvay & Sinan Apak & Emine Cobanoglu, 2020. "An Extended GRA Method Integrated with Fuzzy AHP to Construct a Multidimensional Index for Ranking Overall Energy Sustainability Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Rodica Chetroiu & Ana Elena Cișmileanu & Elena Cofas & Ionut Laurentiu Petre & Steliana Rodino & Vili Dragomir & Ancuța Marin & Petruța Antoneta Turek-Rahoveanu, 2022. "Assessment of the Relations for Determining the Profitability of Dairy Farms, A Premise of Their Economic Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Zhengmin Liu & Lin Li & Xiaolan Zhao & Linbin Sha & Di Wang & Xinya Wang & Peide Liu, 2020. "Selecting the Optimal Green Agricultural Products Supplier: A Novel Approach Based on GBWM and PROMETHEE II," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Li Li & Hegong Lei & Jun Wang, 2020. "Q -Rung Probabilistic Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Their Application in Multi-Attribute Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-34, September.
    11. Fatih Ecer, 2022. "Multi-criteria decision making for green supplier selection using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study of a home appliance manufacturer," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 199-233, March.
    12. Sophia Xiaoxia Duan & Santoso Wibowo & Josephine Chong, 2021. "A Multicriteria Analysis Approach for Evaluating the Performance of Agriculture Decision Support Systems for Sustainable Agribusiness," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Hisham Alidrisi, 2021. "Measuring the Environmental Maturity of the Supply Chain Finance: A Big Data-Based Multi-Criteria Perspective," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-24, April.
    14. Huijie Li & Jie Li, 2021. "Risk Governance and Sustainability: A Scientometric Analysis and Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Tatyana Khudyakova & Vladimir Zhuravlyov & Natalia Varkova & Sergei Aliukov & Svetlana Shmidt & Nicolay Zhuravlyov, 2020. "Improving Approaches to Strategic Enterprise Management in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    16. Mariano Méndez-Suárez & Abel Monfort & Fernando Gallardo, 2020. "Sustainable Banking: New Forms of Investing under the Umbrella of the 2030 Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Zoltán Csedő & József Magyari & Máté Zavarkó, 2022. "Dynamic Corporate Governance, Innovation, and Sustainability: Post-COVID Period," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Vladimir Zhuravlyov & Tatyana Khudyakova & Natalia Varkova & Sergei Aliukov & Svetlana Shmidt, 2019. "Improving the Strategic Management of Investment Activities of Industrial Enterprises as a Factor for Sustainable Development in a Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Pal Singh, Satender & Adhikari, Arnab & Majumdar, Adrija & Bisi, Arnab, 2022. "Does service quality influence operational and financial performance of third party logistics service providers? A mixed multi criteria decision making -text mining-based investigation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    20. Ananna Paul & Nagesh Shukla & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Andrea Trianni, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7108-:d:581664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.