IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6430-d569356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strength and Durability of Cement-Treated Lateritic Soil

Author

Listed:
  • Norshakila Abdul Wahab

    (Department of Geotechnics and Transpiration, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia)

  • Mohammad Jawed Roshan

    (Department of Geotechnics and Transpiration, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia
    Faculty of Transportation Engineering, Kabul Polytechnic University, Kabul 1001, Afghanistan)

  • Ahmad Safuan A. Rashid

    (Department of Geotechnics and Transpiration, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia
    Centre of Tropical Geoengineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia)

  • Muhammad Azril Hezmi

    (Department of Geotechnics and Transpiration, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia)

  • Siti Norafida Jusoh

    (Department of Geotechnics and Transpiration, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia)

  • Nik Daud Nik Norsyahariati

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Selangor 43400, Malaysia)

  • Sakina Tamassoki

    (Faculty of Transportation Engineering, Kabul Polytechnic University, Kabul 1001, Afghanistan
    Department of Civil Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, Selangor 43400, Malaysia)

Abstract

The transportation infrastructure, including low-volume roads in some regions, needs to be constructed on weak ground, implying the necessity of soil stabilization. Untreated and cement-treated lateritic soil for low-volume road suitability were studied based on Malaysian standards. A series of unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests was performed for four cement doses (3%, 6%, 9%, 12%) for different curing times. According to Malaysian standards, the study suggested 6% cement and 7 days curing time as the optimum cement dosage and curing time, respectively, based on their 0.8 MPa UCS values. The durability test indicated that the specimens treated with 3% cement collapsed directly upon soaking in water. Although the UCS of 6% cement-treated specimens decreased against wetting–drying (WD) cycles, the minimum threshold based on Malaysian standards was still maintained against 15 WD cycles. On the contrary, the durability of specimens treated with 9% and 12% cement represented a UCS increase against WD cycles. FESEM results indicated the formation of calcium aluminate hydrate (CAH), calcium silicate hydrate (CSH), and calcium aluminosilicate hydrate (CASH) as well as shrinking of pore size when untreated soil was mixed with cement. The formation of gels (CAH, CSH, CASH) and decreasing pore size could be clarified by EDX results in which the increase in cement content increased calcium.

Suggested Citation

  • Norshakila Abdul Wahab & Mohammad Jawed Roshan & Ahmad Safuan A. Rashid & Muhammad Azril Hezmi & Siti Norafida Jusoh & Nik Daud Nik Norsyahariati & Sakina Tamassoki, 2021. "Strength and Durability of Cement-Treated Lateritic Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6430-:d:569356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6430/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6430/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José Luis Pastor & Roberto Tomás & Miguel Cano & Adrián Riquelme & Erick Gutiérrez, 2019. "Evaluation of the Improvement Effect of Limestone Powder Waste in the Stabilization of Swelling Clayey Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, January.
    2. Peter Fisher & Colin Aumann & Kohleth Chia & Nick O'Halloran & Subhash Chandra, 2017. "Adequacy of laser diffraction for soil particle size analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Md Mizanur Rahman & Reena N. Hora & Isaac Ahenkorah & Simon Beecham & Md Rajibul Karim & Asif Iqbal, 2020. "State-of-the-Art Review of Microbial-Induced Calcite Precipitation and Its Sustainability in Engineering Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-43, August.
    4. Yan-Jun Du & Ming-Li Wei & Krishna Reddy & Fei Jin, 2014. "Compressibility of cement-stabilized zinc-contaminated high plasticity clay," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(2), pages 671-683, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaoya Bian & Haodong Yang & Jiale Chen & Hui Liu & Xuyong Chen, 2022. "Experimental Study on the Strength and Stress–Strain Properties of Waste Concrete Fine Aggregate and Cement-Solidified Sludge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Sakina Tamassoki & Nik Norsyahariati Nik Daud & Fauzan Mohd Jakarni & Faradiella Mohd. Kusin & Ahmad Safuan A. Rashid & Mohammad Jawed Roshan, 2022. "Compressive and Shear Strengths of Coir Fibre Reinforced Activated Carbon Stabilised Lateritic Soil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asif Iqbal & Md Mizanur Rahman & Simon Beecham, 2022. "Permeable Pavements for Flood Control in Australia: Spatial Analysis of Pavement Design Considering Rainfall and Soil Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Joyce Nakayenga & Mutsuko Inui & Toshiro Hata, 2022. "Study on the Effect of Amorphous Silica from Waste Granite Powder on the Strength Development of Cement-Treated Clay for Soft Ground Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Md Rajibul Karim & Md Mizanur Rahman & Khoi Nguyen & Donald Cameron & Asif Iqbal & Isaac Ahenkorah, 2021. "Changes in Thornthwaite Moisture Index and Reactive Soil Movements under Current and Future Climate Scenarios—A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Zhongping Yang & Jiazhuo Chang & Yao Wang & Xuyong Li & Shu Li, 2021. "Effects of Long-Term Freeze–Thaw Cycles on the Properties of Stabilized/Solidified Lead-Zinc-Cadmium Composite-Contaminated Soil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Eleonora Grilli & Renata Concetta Vigliotti & Antonio Fiorentino & Monica Scognamiglio & Luigi Rossetti & Thiago Assis Rodrigues Nogueira & Arun Dilipkumar Jani & Cassio Hamilton Abreu-Junior & Ludmil, 2023. "Constructed Technosols as a Soil Rebuilding Technique to Reclaim Abandoned Limestone Quarries in the Mediterranean Region: A Field Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Paweł Strzałkowski, 2021. "Characteristics of Waste Generated in Dimension Stone Processing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Xingzhong Nong & Yuehua Liang & Shan Lin & Yi Lu & Zhi Shang, 2022. "Investigation of Impact on Hydro-Mechanical Properties for Cement Stabilized Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil under Different Salinity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Michael Z. Izzo & Marta Miletić, 2019. "Sustainable Improvement of the Crack Resistance of Cohesive Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.
    9. Evangelin Ramani Sujatha & Govindarajan Kannan, 2022. "An Investigation on the Potential of Cellulose for Soil Stabilization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6430-:d:569356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.