IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5355-d552388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Habitat Vulnerability and Loss of Naturalness: Applying the GLOBIO3 Model in the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Vilém Pechanec

    (Department of Geoinformatics, Faculty of Science, Palacký University in Olomouc, 17. listopadu 50, CZ-771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic)

  • Ondřej Cudlín

    (Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lipová 9, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

  • Miloš Zapletal

    (Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lipová 9, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
    Institute of Physics in Opava, Silesian University in Opava, Bezručovo Náměstí 1150/13, CZ-746 01 Opava, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Purkyt

    (Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lipová 9, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
    Department of Landscape Management, Faculty of Agriculture, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Studentská 1668, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

  • Lenka Štěrbová

    (Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lipová 9, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

  • Karel Chobot

    (Nature Conservation Agency, Kaplanova 1, CZ-148 00 Praha, Czech Republic)

  • Elvis Tangwa

    (Department of Geoinformatics, Faculty of Science, Palacký University in Olomouc, 17. listopadu 50, CZ-771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic)

  • Renata Včeláková

    (Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lipová 9, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

  • Marcela Prokopová

    (Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lipová 9, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

  • Pavel Cudlín

    (Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Lipová 9, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Global and regional biodiversity loss is caused by several drivers including urban development, land use intensification, overexploitation of natural resources, environmental pollution, and climate change. The main aim of our study was to adapt the GLOBIO3 model to the conditions of the Czech Republic (CR) to assess loss of naturalness and biodiversity vulnerability at the habitat level on a detailed scale across the entire CR. An additional aim was to assess the main drivers affecting the biodiversity of habitat types. The GLOBIO3 model was adapted to CZ-GLOBIO by adapting global to local scales and using habitat quality and naturalness data instead of species occurrence data. The total mean species abundance (MSA) index of habitat quality, calculated from the spatial overlay of the four MSA indicators by our new equation, reached the value 0.62. The total value of MSA for natural and near-natural habitats was found to be affected mainly by infrastructure development and fragmentation. Simultaneously, intensity of land use change and atmospheric nitrogen deposition contributed primarily to the low total value of MSA for distant natural habitats. The CZ-GLOBIO model can be an important tool in political decision making to reduce the impact of the main drivers on habitat biodiversity in the CR.

Suggested Citation

  • Vilém Pechanec & Ondřej Cudlín & Miloš Zapletal & Jan Purkyt & Lenka Štěrbová & Karel Chobot & Elvis Tangwa & Renata Včeláková & Marcela Prokopová & Pavel Cudlín, 2021. "Assessing Habitat Vulnerability and Loss of Naturalness: Applying the GLOBIO3 Model in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5355-:d:552388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5355/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5355/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. J. Scholes & R. Biggs, 2005. "A biodiversity intactness index," Nature, Nature, vol. 434(7029), pages 45-49, March.
    2. Verboom, Jana & Alkemade, Rob & Klijn, Jan & Metzger, Marc J. & Reijnen, Rien, 2007. "Combining biodiversity modeling with political and economic development scenarios for 25 EU countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 267-276, April.
    3. Premysl Stych & Jan Kabrda & Ivan Bicik & Josef Lastovicka, 2019. "Regional Differentiation of Long-Term Land Use Changes: A Case Study of Czechia," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Ondřej Cudlín & Vilém Pechanec & Jan Purkyt & Karel Chobot & Luca Salvati & Pavel Cudlín, 2020. "Are Valuable and Representative Natural Habitats Sufficiently Protected? Application of Marxan model in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cepic, Michael & Bechtold, Ulrike & Wilfing, Harald, 2022. "Modelling human influences on biodiversity at a global scale–A human ecology perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).
    2. Stephanie D. Maier & Jan Paul Lindner & Javier Francisco, 2019. "Conceptual Framework for Biodiversity Assessments in Global Value Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-34, March.
    3. Elena Gorbenkova & Elena Shcherbina, 2020. "Historical-Genetic Features in Rural Settlement System: A Case Study from Mogilev District (Mogilev Oblast, Belarus)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Halkos, George E., 2011. "Nonparametric modelling of biodiversity: Determinants of threatened species," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 618-635, July.
    5. Melissa Anne Beryl Vogt, 2021. "Ecological sensitivity within human realities concept for improved functional biodiversity outcomes in agricultural systems and landscapes," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Changbai Xi & Yao Chi & Tianlu Qian & Wenhan Zhang & Jiechen Wang, 2020. "Simulation of Human Activity Intensity and Its Influence on Mammal Diversity in Sanjiangyuan National Park, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Bjoern Soergel & Elmar Kriegler & Isabelle Weindl & Sebastian Rauner & Alois Dirnaichner & Constantin Ruhe & Matthias Hofmann & Nico Bauer & Christoph Bertram & Benjamin Leon Bodirsky & Marian Leimbac, 2021. "A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 Agenda," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(8), pages 656-664, August.
    8. Ding, Helen & Nunes, Paulo A.L.D., 2014. "Modeling the links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human wellbeing in the context of climate change: Results from an econometric analysis of the European forest ecosystems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 60-73.
    9. Halkos, George, 2010. "Modelling biodiversity," MPRA Paper 39075, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Iker Etxano & Itziar Barinaga-Rementeria & Oihana Garcia, 2018. "Conflicting Values in Rural Planning: A Multifunctionality Approach through Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-29, May.
    11. Manuschevich, Daniela & Sarricolea, Pablo & Galleguillos, Mauricio, 2019. "Integrating socio-ecological dynamics into land use policy outcomes: A spatial scenario approach for native forest conservation in south-central Chile," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 31-42.
    12. Zhang, Daojun & Yang, Wanjing & Kang, Dingrong & Zhang, Han, 2023. "Spatial-temporal characteristics and policy implication for non-grain production of cultivated land in Guanzhong Region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Sagoff, Mark, 2018. "What Is Invasion Biology?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 22-30.
    14. Dardanoni, Valentino & Guerriero, Carla, 2021. "Young people' s willingness to pay for environmental protection," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    15. Alena Harbiankova & Elena Scherbina, 2021. "Evaluation Model for Sustainable Development of Settlement System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Sutapa Adhikari & Anine Jordaan & Johan Paul Beukes & Stefan John Siebert, 2022. "Anthropogenic Sources Dominate Foliar Chromium Dust Deposition in a Mining-Based Urban Region of South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Mugurel Ionel JITEA & Diana Elena DUMITRAȘ & Vasile Alexandru SIMU, 2015. "An ex-ante impact assessment of the Common Agricultural Policy reform in the North-Western Romania," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(2), pages 88-103.
    18. Vaishali Vasudeva & Sujata Upgupta & Ajay Singh & Nazrukh Sherwani & Supratim Dutta & Rajasekar Rajaraman & Sankarshan Chaudhuri & Satyam Verma & Jeyaraj Antony Johnson & Ramesh Krishnamurthy, 2022. "Conservation Prioritization in a Tiger Landscape: Is Umbrella Species Enough?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Voloshinskaya, Anna A. (Волошинская, Анна А.) & Komarov, Vladimir M. (Комаров, Владимир М.) & Kotsyubinskiy, Vladimir A. (Коцюбинский, Владимир), 2017. "Contemporary Theories of Sustainable Development: Approaches, Methodology, Practical Recommendations [Современные Теории Устойчивого Развития: Подходы, Методология, Прикладные Рекомендации]," Working Papers 021702, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    20. Nina Noreika & Julie Winterová & Tailin Li & Josef Krása & Tomáš Dostál, 2021. "The Small Water Cycle in the Czech Landscape: How Has It Been Affected by Land Management Changes Over Time?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5355-:d:552388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.