IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1545-d322287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Elements of Intellectual Capital Improve Business Sustainability?—The Perspective of Managers of SMEs in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Elwira Gross-Gołacka

    (Łukasiewicz Research Network Institute of Organization and Management in Industry “ORGMASZ”, 00-879 Warszawa, Poland
    Academic Unit for Organization and Management Theory, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Marta Kusterka-Jefmańska

    (Department of Quality and Environmental Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Bartłomiej Jefmański

    (Łukasiewicz Research Network Institute of Organization and Management in Industry “ORGMASZ”, 00-879 Warszawa, Poland
    Department of Econometrics and Computer Science, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

Many organizations choose business sustainability to meet environmental, social, and financial demands to ensure responsible and long-term success. In order to achieve this, enterprises have to fully and optimally apply their resources. Intellectual capital is one of their most important resources creating market value and reinforcing sustainable competitive advantages. The main goal of the paper is to indicate which elements of the intellectual capital of small and medium-sized enterprises in Poland have the greatest impact on their sustainable development in the opinions of managers. The study took into account 1041 economic entities. Managers of small and medium enterprises operating in Poland have been asked to assess the elements of intellectual capital. The paper utilizes a new approach to the importance assessment of the impact of each characteristic on business sustainability. It is based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. The proposed method is especially useful when variables are measured on an ordinal scale. In accordance with the classical theory of measurement, it does not allow the majority of arithmetic calculations to be performed. Based on the results of the research it has been determined that the most important factors are those which constitute human capital. Moreover, the observation has been made that there is a high degree of coherence of opinions expressed by managers of small and medium enterprises. The results of the research can be applied by both managers of enterprises in managing intellectual capital and employees of companies, by increasing their awareness of the topic of the influence of intellectual capital on business sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Elwira Gross-Gołacka & Marta Kusterka-Jefmańska & Bartłomiej Jefmański, 2020. "Can Elements of Intellectual Capital Improve Business Sustainability?—The Perspective of Managers of SMEs in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1545-:d:322287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1545/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1545/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu-Shan Chen, 2008. "The Positive Effect of Green Intellectual Capital on Competitive Advantages of Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 77(3), pages 271-286, February.
    2. Baruch Lev & Stefano Zambon, 2003. "Intangibles and intellectual capital: an introduction to a special issue," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 597-603.
    3. Mike Simpson & Nick Taylor & Karen Barker, 2004. "Environmental responsibility in SMEs: does it deliver competitive advantage?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 156-171, May.
    4. Niamh Brennan & Brenda Connell, 2000. "Intellectual capital : current issues and policy implications," Open Access publications 10197/2916, Research Repository, University College Dublin.
    5. Zahra Ghassabi, 2018. "Measuring of intellectual capital indexes using FAHP technique in institutes of higher education," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 29(2), pages 236-251.
    6. Piasecki, Krzysztof, 2011. "Rozmyte zbiory probabilistyczne jako narzędzie finansów behawioralnych [Fuzzy Probabilistic Sets as a Tool for Behavioural Finance]," MPRA Paper 46218, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Jian Xu & Binghan Wang, 2018. "Intellectual Capital, Financial Performance and Companies’ Sustainable Growth: Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Yu-Shan Chen & Shyh-Bao Lai & Chao-Tung Wen, 2006. "The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 331-339, September.
    9. Anna, Petrenko, 2016. "Мaркування готової продукції як складова частина інформаційного забезпечення маркетингової діяльності підприємств овочепродуктового підкомплексу," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 2(1), March.
    10. Jonas Ammenberg & Olof Hjelm, 2003. "Tracing business and environmental effects of environmental management systems—a study of networking small and medium‐sized enterprises using a joint environmental management system," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 163-174, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Bieńkowska & Katarzyna Tworek & Anna Zabłocka-Kluczka, 2020. "Organizational Reliability Model Verification in the Crisis Escalation Phase Caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Mukhamad Najib & Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman & Abror Abror & Riani Rachmawati & Megawati Simanjuntak & Prita Prasetya & Dwi Suhartanto & Farah Fahma, 2021. "Leaders’ Support of Sustainable Innovation and Business Sustainability in Developing Countries: Evidence from Small and Medium Food Processing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Edyta Bombiak, 2022. "Green Intellectual Capital as a Support for Corporate Environmental Development—Polish Company Experience," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Adolfo Carballo-Penela & Emilio Ruzo-Sanmartín & Carlos M. P. Sousa, 2020. "Influence of Business Commitment to Sustainability, Perceived Value Fit, and Gender in Job Seekers’ Pursuit Intentions: A Cross-Country Moderated Mediation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Agnieszka Bieńkowska & Katarzyna Tworek, 2020. "Job Performance Model Based on Employees’ Dynamic Capabilities (EDC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mihaela Brindusa Tudose & Valentina Diana Rusu & Silvia Avasilcai, 2021. "Performance Management for Growth: A Framework Based on EVA," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Ali Saleh Alshebami, 2021. "Evaluating the relevance of green banking practices on Saudi Banks’ green image: The mediating effect of employees’ green behaviour," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 275-286, December.
    3. Tutun Mukherjee & Som Sankar Sen, 2022. "Impact of CEO attributes on corporate reputation, financial performance, and corporate sustainable growth: evidence from India," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-50, December.
    4. Parisa Salimzadeh & Jerry Courvisanos, 2015. "A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Sustainable Development in Regional SMEs," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Gema Albort-Morant & Jörg Henseler & Antonio Leal-Millán & Gabriel Cepeda-Carrión, 2017. "Mapping the Field: A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Chrisovalantis Malesios & Prasanta K. Dey & Fuad Ben Abdelaziz, 2020. "Supply chain sustainability performance measurement of small and medium sized enterprises using structural equation modeling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 623-653, November.
    7. Shun-Pin Chuang & Sun-Jen Huang, 2018. "The Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility on Environmental Performance and Business Competitiveness: The Mediation of Green Information Technology Capital," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 991-1009, July.
    8. Gilberto Cassoli de Oliveira Junior & Jefferson de Souza Pinto & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Walter Leal Filho & Milena Pavan Serafim & Rosley Anholon, 2021. "Insertion of Sustainable Practices in Small and Medium-Sized Companies: Analysis of the Main Barriers in the Brazilian Metalworking Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-10, October.
    9. Torbjörn Ljungkvist & Jim Andersén, 2021. "A taxonomy of ecopreneurship in small manufacturing firms: A multidimensional cluster analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1374-1388, February.
    10. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang, 2013. "Utilize structural equation modeling (SEM) to explore the influence of corporate environmental ethics: the mediation effect of green human capital," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 79-95, January.
    11. Yu-Shan Chen & Yu-Hsien Lin & Ching-Ying Lin & Chih-Wei Chang, 2015. "Enhancing Green Absorptive Capacity, Green Dynamic Capacities and Green Service Innovation to Improve Firm Performance: An Analysis of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Ching-Hsun Chang, 2011. "The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 361-370, December.
    13. Shun-Pin Chuang & Sun-Jen Huang, 2015. "Effects of Business Greening and Green IT Capital on Business Competitiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 221-231, April.
    14. Tariq, Adeel & Badir, Yuosre F. & Tariq, Waqas & Bhutta, Umair Saeed, 2017. "Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-23.
    15. Nuryakin Nuryakin & Tri Maryati, 2020. "Green product competitiveness and green product success. Why and how does mediating affect green innovation performance?," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(4), pages 3061-3077, June.
    16. Ioniţă Cătălin Gabriel, 2022. "Exploration vs. Exploitation: How Innovation Strategies Impact Firm Performance and Competitive Advantage," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 31-46, August.
    17. Janine Fleith Medeiros & Gabriel Vidor & José Luís Duarte Ribeiro, 2018. "Driving Factors for the Success of the Green Innovation Market: A Relationship System Proposal," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 327-341, January.
    18. Camelia Oprean-Stan & Sebastian Stan & Vasile Brătian, 2020. "Corporate Sustainability and Intangible Resources Binomial: New Proposal on Intangible Resources Recognition and Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    19. García-Granero, Eva M. & Piedra-Muñoz, Laura & Galdeano-Gómez, Emilio, 2020. "Measuring eco-innovation dimensions: The role of environmental corporate culture and commercial orientation," MPRA Paper 119909, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. de Villiers, Charl & Sharma, Umesh, 2020. "A critical reflection on the future of financial, intellectual capital, sustainability and integrated reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1545-:d:322287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.