IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i2p510-d306829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Involvement in the Implementation of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDSs): The Case of Bon Pastor, Barcelona

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Nóblega Carriquiry

    (Master of International Cooperation Sustainable Emergency Architecture, School of Architecture, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, Spain)

  • David Sauri

    (Departament de Geografia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra-Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain)

  • Hug March

    (Estudis d’Economia i Empresa & Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3), Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), 08035 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

The persistence of urban floods and the inability of aging sewage infrastructure to deal with stormwater make sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDSs) one of the emerging paradigms in urban water management, in which stormwater is no longer a hazard but a resource. Although most of the global research has been done on the technical aspects of SUDSs, their social impacts are not always taken into consideration. The neighborhood scale that characterizes SUDSs creates a different governance system—compared to the old structures of flood risk management—characterized by decentralization practices and where communities gain a better position of negotiation and new responsibilities. The objective of this research is to recognize how the diverse stakeholders involved in SUDSs interact with each other and to look into the different levels of understanding SUDSs as a new alternative of stormwater infrastructure. In order to accomplish this task, the paper introduces the case of the neighborhood of Bon Pastor (Barcelona, Spain), which has gone through urban transformations over the past years, promoting the development of SUDSs in 2012. Empirical evidence was obtained from 10 semi-structured interviews with government, technicians, social organizations, and local community citizens as well as revision of existing policy documents and grey literature on SUDSs and historical documents on the development of the neighborhood. The results show how active the community was during the design process and afterward, as sustainability gradually became one of the main topics in the neighborhood to be incorporated in new developments. However, it also unveiled several issues related to maintenance and the ambiguity of the term SUDS for the different stakeholders involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Nóblega Carriquiry & David Sauri & Hug March, 2020. "Community Involvement in the Implementation of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDSs): The Case of Bon Pastor, Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:510-:d:306829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/510/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/2/510/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bradbury-Jones, Caroline & Taylor, Julie & Herber, Oliver, 2014. "How theory is used and articulated in qualitative research: Development of a new typology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 135-141.
    2. Elisa Lähde & Ambika Khadka & Outi Tahvonen & Teemu Kokkonen, 2019. "Can We Really Have It All?—Designing Multifunctionality with Sustainable Urban Drainage System Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Susanne Charlesworth & Frank Warwick & Craig Lashford, 2016. "Decision-Making and Sustainable Drainage: Design and Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Carsten Dierkes & Terry Lucke & Brigitte Helmreich, 2015. "General Technical Approvals for Decentralised Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS)—The Current Situation in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-21, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sabina Kordana & Daniel Słyś, 2020. "Decision Criteria for the Development of Stormwater Management Systems in Poland," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Mariusz Starzec & Józef Dziopak & Daniel Słyś, 2020. "An Analysis of Stormwater Management Variants in Urban Catchments," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Ignacio Andrés-Doménech & Jose Anta & Sara Perales-Momparler & Jorge Rodriguez-Hernandez, 2021. "Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems in Spain: A Diagnosis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    4. Ana Isabel Abellán García & Noelia Cruz Pérez & Juan C. Santamarta, 2021. "Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems in Spain: Analysis of the Research on SUDS Based on Climatology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Johnson & Judith Exl & Sylvie Geisendorf, 2021. "The Potential of Stormwater Management in Addressing the Urban Heat Island Effect: An Economic Valuation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Giulio Senes & Paolo Stefano Ferrario & Gianpaolo Cirone & Natalia Fumagalli & Paolo Frattini & Giovanna Sacchi & Giorgio Valè, 2021. "Nature-Based Solutions for Storm Water Management—Creation of a Green Infrastructure Suitability Map as a Tool for Land-Use Planning at the Municipal Level in the Province of Monza-Brianza (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Vladimir Krivtsov & Brian J. D’Arcy & Alejandro Escribano Sevilla & Scott Arthur & Chris Semple, 2021. "Mitigating Polluted Runoff from Industrial Estates by SUDS Retrofits: Case Studies of Problems and Solutions Co-Designed with a Participatory Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Elisabeth A. Shrimpton & Dexter Hunt & Chris D.F. Rogers, 2021. "Justice in (English) Water Infrastructure: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Vasconcelos, Anaí Floriano & Barbassa, Ademir Paceli & dos Santos, Maria Fernanda Nóbrega & Imani, Maryam Astaraie, 2022. "Barriers to sustainable urban stormwater management in developing countries: The case of Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    6. Andrew Shepherd & Caroline Sanders & Michael Doyle & Jenny Shaw, 2016. "Personal recovery in personality disorder: Systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative methods studies," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 62(1), pages 41-50, February.
    7. Renato Monteiro & José C. Ferreira & Paula Antunes, 2020. "Green Infrastructure Planning Principles: An Integrated Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Tanja Fluhrer & Fernando Chapa & Jochen Hack, 2021. "A Methodology for Assessing the Implementation Potential for Retrofitted and Multifunctional Urban Green Infrastructure in Public Areas of the Global South," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    9. Yiqing Dai & Jiwang Jiang & Xingyu Gu & Yanjing Zhao & Fujian Ni, 2020. "Sustainable Urban Street Comprising Permeable Pavement and Bioretention Facilities: A Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Susanne Charlesworth & Frank Warwick & Craig Lashford, 2016. "Decision-Making and Sustainable Drainage: Design and Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, August.
    11. Outi Tahvonen, 2018. "Scalable Green Infrastructure—The Case of Domestic Private Gardens in Vuores, Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Alessandro Stievano & Laura Sabatino & Dyanne Affonso & Douglas Olsen & Isabelle Skinner & Gennaro Rocco, 2019. "Nursing’s professional dignity in palliative care: Exploration of an Italian context," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1633-1642, May.
    13. Gale, Nicola & Dowswell, George & Greenfield, Sheila & Marshall, Tom, 2017. "Street-level diplomacy? Communicative and adaptive work at the front line of implementing public health policies in primary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 9-18.
    14. Daniel Mora-Melià & Carlos S. López-Aburto & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez & Pedro Muñoz-Velasco, 2018. "Viability of Green Roofs as a Flood Mitigation Element in the Central Region of Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Julie Taylor & Caroline Bradbury‐Jones & Jenna P Breckenridge & Christine Jones & Oliver Rudolf Herber, 2016. "Risk of vicarious trauma in nursing research: a focused mapping review and synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2768-2777, October.
    16. Talukder, Md Shamim & Shen, Liang & Hossain Talukder, Md Farid & Bao, Yukun, 2019. "Determinants of user acceptance and use of open government data (OGD): An empirical investigation in Bangladesh," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 147-156.
    17. Moises Failache & Nívea Pons & Osni Pejon & Lázaro Zuquette, 2022. "Suitability Zoning for Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDSs): Application in a Basin in Southern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-29, February.
    18. Stephen Coupe & Dalrene James & Alan P. Newman & Liz Trenchard, 2023. "Landscape and Horticultural Fertigation Using Roof-Derived Storm Water: The Potential Multiple Benefits of Blue Green Roof Installations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    19. Adriana A. Zuniga-Teran & Andrea K. Gerlak, 2019. "A Multidisciplinary Approach to Analyzing Questions of Justice Issues in Urban Greenspace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, May.
    20. Ilya Kuzminov & Dirk Meissner & Alina Lavrynenko & Elena Tochilina, 2018. "Technology Classification for the Purposes of Futures Studies," HSE Working papers WP BRP 78/STI/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:2:p:510-:d:306829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.