IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p7134-d407305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptual Scheme Decision Model for Mechatronic Products Driven by Risk of Function Failure Propagation

Author

Listed:
  • Liting Jing

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
    College of Computer Science & Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Qingqing Xu

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Tao Sun

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Xiang Peng

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Jiquan Li

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Fei Gao

    (College of Computer Science & Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Shaofei Jiang

    (College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

Abstract

Reliability is a major performance index in the electromechanical product conceptual design decision process. As the function is the purpose of product design, the risk of scheme design is easy to be caused when there is a failure (i.e., function failure). However, existing reliability analysis models focus on the failure analysis of functions but ignore the quantitative risk assessment of conceptual schemes when function failures occur. In addition, design information with subjectivity and fuzziness is difficult to introduce the risk index into the early design stage for comprehensive decisions. To fill this gap, this paper proposes a conceptual scheme decision model for mechatronic products driven by the risk of function failure propagation. Firstly, the function structure model is used to construct the function fault propagation model, so as to obtain the influence degree of the subfunction failure. Secondly, the principle solution weight is calculated when the function failure is propagated, and the influence degree of the failure mode is integrated to obtain the severity of the failure mode on the product system. Thirdly, the risk value of failure mode is calculated by multiplying the severity and failure probability of failure mode, and the risk value of the scheme is obtained based on the influence relationship between failure modes. Finally, the VIKOR (Višekriterijumska Optimizacija i kompromisno Rešenje) method is used to make the optimal decision for the conceptual scheme, and then take the cutting speed regulating device scheme of shearer as an example to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed decision model.

Suggested Citation

  • Liting Jing & Qingqing Xu & Tao Sun & Xiang Peng & Jiquan Li & Fei Gao & Shaofei Jiang, 2020. "Conceptual Scheme Decision Model for Mechatronic Products Driven by Risk of Function Failure Propagation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7134-:d:407305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/7134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongzhan Ma & Xuening Chu & Deyi Xue & Dongping Chen, 2019. "Identification of to-be-improved components for redesign of complex products and systems based on fuzzy QFD and FMEA," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 623-639, February.
    2. Yontay, Petek & Pan, Rong, 2016. "A computational Bayesian approach to dependency assessment in system reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 104-114.
    3. Kwag, Shinyoung & Gupta, Abhinav & Dinh, Nam, 2018. "Probabilistic risk assessment based model validation method using Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 380-393.
    4. Peeters, J.F.W. & Basten, R.J.I. & Tinga, T., 2018. "Improving failure analysis efficiency by combining FTA and FMEA in a recursive manner," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 36-44.
    5. Leimeister, Mareike & Kolios, Athanasios, 2018. "A review of reliability-based methods for risk analysis and their application in the offshore wind industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1065-1076.
    6. Yupeng Li & Zhaotong Wang & Xiaoyu Zhong & Fan Zou, 2019. "Identification of influential function modules within complex products and systems based on weighted and directed complex networks," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 2375-2390, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanyang Luo & Wugang Song & Wanhua Zhou & Xudong Lin & Sumin Yu, 2023. "An Analysis Framework to Reveal Automobile Users’ Preferences from Online User-Generated Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-29, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, He & Diaz, H. & Guedes Soares, C., 2021. "A developed failure mode and effect analysis for floating offshore wind turbine support structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 133-145.
    2. Li, He & Teixeira, Angelo P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2020. "A two-stage Failure Mode and Effect Analysis of offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1438-1461.
    3. Li, He & Guedes Soares, C, 2022. "Assessment of failure rates and reliability of floating offshore wind turbines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Deirdre O’Donnell & Jimmy Murphy & Vikram Pakrashi, 2020. "Damage Monitoring of a Catenary Moored Spar Platform for Renewable Energy Devices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Albara M. Mustafa & Abbas Barabadi, 2022. "Criteria-Based Fuzzy Logic Risk Analysis of Wind Farms Operation in Cold Climate Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Vimal Vijayan & Sanjay K Chaturvedi & Ritesh Chandra, 2020. "A failure interaction model for multicomponent repairable systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 470-486, June.
    7. Chaocheng He & Jiang Wu & Qingpeng Zhang, 2021. "Characterizing research leadership on geographically weighted collaboration network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4005-4037, May.
    8. Shinyoung Kwag & Jinsung Kwak & Hwanho Lee & Jinho Oh & Gyeong-Hoi Koo, 2019. "Enhancement in the Seismic Performance of a Nuclear Piping System using Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Yue Xi & Zhiyong Gao & Kun Chen & Hongwei Dai & Zhe Liu, 2022. "Error Propagation Model Using Jacobian-Torsor Model Weighting for Assembly Quality Analysis on Complex Product," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Zhi-Jiao Du & Zhi-Xiang Chen & Su-Min Yu, 2021. "Improved Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: Implementing Risk Assessment and Conflict Risk Mitigation with Probabilistic Linguistic Information," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Wang, Lizhi & Pan, Rong & Wang, Xiaohong & Fan, Wenhui & Xuan, Jinquan, 2017. "A Bayesian reliability evaluation method with different types of data from multiple sources," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 128-135.
    12. Lo, Huai-Wei & Liou, James J.H. & Huang, Chun-Nen & Chuang, Yen-Ching, 2019. "A novel failure mode and effect analysis model for machine tool risk analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 173-183.
    13. Zuzhen Ji & Dirk Pons & John Pearse, 2021. "A Methodology for Harmonizing Safety and Health Scales in Occupational Risk Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Bodda, Saran Srikanth & Gupta, Abhinav & Dinh, Nam, 2020. "Enhancement of risk informed validation framework for external hazard scenario," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    15. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & José Torres Farinha & José Edmundo de Almeida e Pais, 2021. "An Integrated Fuzzy Fault Tree Model with Bayesian Network-Based Maintenance Optimization of Complex Equipment in Automotive Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Amrin, Andas & Zarikas, Vasileios & Spitas, Christos, 2018. "Reliability analysis and functional design using Bayesian networks generated automatically by an “Idea Algebra†framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 211-225.
    17. Jin, Song & Gong, Jinxin, 2021. "Fragility analysis and probabilistic performance evaluation of nuclear containment structure subjected to internal pressure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    18. Wang, Chong & Matthies, Hermann G., 2019. "Novel model calibration method via non-probabilistic interval characterization and Bayesian theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 84-92.
    19. Kai Pan & Hui Liu & Xiaoqing Gou & Rui Huang & Dong Ye & Haining Wang & Adam Glowacz & Jie Kong, 2022. "Towards a Systematic Description of Fault Tree Analysis Studies Using Informetric Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    20. Liu, Jintao & Schmid, Felix & Zheng, Wei & Zhu, Jiebei, 2019. "Understanding railway operational accidents using network theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 218-231.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7134-:d:407305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.