IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i11p4768-d370005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Sustainable Urban Planning for Puyo (Ecuador): Amazon Forest Landscape as Potential Green Infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Thony Huera-Lucero

    (Environmental Engineering, Department of Life Sciences, Universidad Estatal Amazónica (UEA), Puyo 160101, Pastaza, Ecuador
    Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de Extremadura (UEX), 06071 Badajoz, Spain)

  • Adela Salas-Ruiz

    (Environmental Engineering, Department of Life Sciences, Universidad Estatal Amazónica (UEA), Puyo 160101, Pastaza, Ecuador
    ICHaB-ETSAM, Architecture School, Universidad Politécnica of Madrid (UPM), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Daysi Changoluisa

    (Environmental Engineering, Department of Life Sciences, Universidad Estatal Amazónica (UEA), Puyo 160101, Pastaza, Ecuador)

  • Carlos Bravo-Medina

    (Environmental Conservation and Management Program, Universidad Estatal Amazónica, Puyo 160101, Pastaza, Ecuador)

Abstract

The peri-urban area of Puyo, where agricultural, urban and conservation logics are mixed, is a contested area in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Rapid urban growth and agricultural activities are the main threats to the conservation of its biodiversity. To promote the conservation of natural spaces in urban planning instruments, it is necessary to first demonstrate their environmental and ecological value. In this paper, such value was analyzed by quantifying biodiversity value and carbon storage capacity in situ. The results show that Puyo’s periphery (a 4 km radius) is an opportunity space, where the conservation of its biodiversity is a key factor in strategies to promote sustainable urban development. Firstly, there are natural areas of high environmental value (secondary forest, gramalote pastures with trees and gramalote pastures) that all together fix 1,664,683 Mg CO 2 and control hydrological risks (with 80% of the green areas linked to flood areas)—valuable ecosystem services. Secondly, the conservation of biodiversity brings associated economic activities that can promote local sustainable development. Despite this, the results reveal that the conservation of peri-urban natural ecosystems is not a goal in Puyo’s urban planning strategy. Therefore, future research should be focused on urban planning tools that promote environmentally, economically and socially sustainable urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Thony Huera-Lucero & Adela Salas-Ruiz & Daysi Changoluisa & Carlos Bravo-Medina, 2020. "Towards Sustainable Urban Planning for Puyo (Ecuador): Amazon Forest Landscape as Potential Green Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4768-:d:370005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4768/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4768/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corrado Battisti & Longino Contoli, 2011. "Diversity Indices as 'Magic' Tools in Landscape Planning: A Cautionary Note on their Uncritical Use," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 111-117, February.
    2. Mohebalian, Phillip M. & Aguilar, Francisco X., 2018. "Beneath the Canopy: Tropical Forests Enrolled in Conservation Payments Reveal Evidence of Less Degradation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 64-73.
    3. Bernardino Romano & Francesco Zullo, 2013. "Models of Urban Land Use in Europe: Assessment Tools and Criticalities," International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems (IJAEIS), IGI Global, vol. 4(3), pages 80-97, July.
    4. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Ahani, Somayeh, 2019. "Land tenure-related conflicts in peri-urban areas: A review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 218-229.
    5. Xuhui Wang & Shilong Piao & Philippe Ciais & Pierre Friedlingstein & Ranga B. Myneni & Peter Cox & Martin Heimann & John Miller & Shushi Peng & Tao Wang & Hui Yang & Anping Chen, 2014. "A two-fold increase of carbon cycle sensitivity to tropical temperature variations," Nature, Nature, vol. 506(7487), pages 212-215, February.
    6. Max Hislop & Alister J. Scott & Alastair Corbett, 2019. "What Does Good Green Infrastructure Planning Policy Look Like? Developing and Testing a Policy Assessment Tool Within Central Scotland UK," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 633-655, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elie Hanna & Francisco A. Comín, 2021. "Urban Green Infrastructure and Sustainable Development: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Shuhui Yu & Xin Guan & Junfan Zhu & Zeyu Wang & Youting Jian & Weijia Wang & Ya Yang, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence and Urban Green Space Facilities Optimization Using the LSTM Model: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Bolier Torres & Carlos Bravo & Alexandra Torres & Cristhian Tipán-Torres & Julio C. Vargas & Robinson J. Herrera-Feijoo & Marco Heredia-R & Cecilio Barba & Antón García, 2022. "Carbon Stock Assessment in Silvopastoral Systems along an Elevational Gradient: A Study from Cattle Producers in the Sumaco Biosphere Reserve, Ecuadorian Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kleemann, Janina & Struve, Berenike & Spyra, Marcin, 2023. "Conflicts in urban peripheries in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    2. Sirirat Sae Lim & Hong Ngoc Nguyen & Chia-Li Lin, 2022. "Exploring the Development Strategies of Science Parks Using the Hybrid MCDM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, April.
    3. Shafi, Ahsan & Wang, Zhanqi & Ehsan, Muhsan & Riaz, Faizan Ahmed & Ali, Muhammad Rashid & Xu, Feng, 2023. "A game theory approach to land acquisition conflicts in Pakistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    4. Bernardino Romano & Lorena Fiorini & Alessandro Marucci & Francesco Zullo, 2020. "The Urbanization Run-Up in Italy: From a Qualitative Goal in the Boom Decades to the Present and Future Unsustainability," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Baka, Anastasia & Mabon, Leslie, 2020. "Assessing equality in neighbourhood availability of quality greenspace in Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom," SocArXiv d9jeh, Center for Open Science.
    6. Yao Zhang & Pierre Gentine & Xiangzhong Luo & Xu Lian & Yanlan Liu & Sha Zhou & Anna M. Michalak & Wu Sun & Joshua B. Fisher & Shilong Piao & Trevor F. Keenan, 2022. "Increasing sensitivity of dryland vegetation greenness to precipitation due to rising atmospheric CO2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    7. Somayeh Ahani & Hashem Dadashpoor, 2021. "Urban growth containment policies for the guidance and control of peri-urbanization: a review and proposed framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14215-14244, October.
    8. Gabriela Demarchi & Subervie Julie & Thibault Catry & Isabelle Tritsch, 2020. "Using publicly available remote sensing products to evaluate REDD+ projects in Brazil," Working Papers hal-02898225, HAL.
    9. Renato Monteiro & José C. Ferreira & Paula Antunes, 2020. "Green Infrastructure Planning Principles: An Integrated Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Héritier Khoji Muteya & Dieu-donné N’Tambwe Nghonda & Franco Mwamba Kalenda & Harold Strammer & François Munyemba Kankumbi & François Malaisse & Jean-François Bastin & Yannick Useni Sikuzani & Jan Bog, 2023. "Mapping and Quantification of Miombo Deforestation in the Lubumbashi Charcoal Production Basin (DR Congo): Spatial Extent and Changes between 1990 and 2022," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Wang, Weifang, 2021. "Nuanced insights into land buyer perceptions of engaging in rural land transactions from a cost perspective: Evidence from China’s emerging rural land market," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    12. Leyre Echevarría Icaza & Franklin Van der Hoeven, 2017. "Regionalist Principles to Reduce the Urban Heat Island Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Bernardino Romano & Lorena Fiorini & Francesco Zullo & Alessandro Marucci, 2017. "Urban Growth Control DSS Techniques for De-Sprinkling Process in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Edeh, Hyacinth O. & Mavrotas, George & Balana, Bedru B., 2022. "Land tenure security and preferences to dispute resolution pathways among landholders in Nigeria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Richard leBrasseur, 2023. "Citizen Sensing within Urban Greenspaces: Exploring Human Wellbeing Interactions in Deprived Communities of Glasgow," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, July.
    16. Feriga, Moustafa & Lozano Gracia, Nancy & Serneels, Pieter, 2024. "The Impact of Climate Change on Work Lessons for Developing Countries," IZA Discussion Papers 16914, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Wubie, Abebe Mengaw & de Vries, Walter T. & Alemie, Berhanu Kefale, 2021. "Synthesizing the dilemmas and prospects for a peri-urban land use management framework: Evidence from Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    18. Dost, Florian, 2015. "A non-linear causal network of marketing channel system structure," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 49-57.
    19. Mário Monteiro & Alexandre Oliveira Tavares, 2015. "What is the Influence of the Planning Framework on the Land Use Change Trajectories? Photointerpretation Analysis in the 1958–2011 Period for a Medium/Small Sized City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-29, August.
    20. Fischer, Rico & Bohn, Friedrich & Dantas de Paula, Mateus & Dislich, Claudia & Groeneveld, Jürgen & Gutiérrez, Alvaro G. & Kazmierczak, Martin & Knapp, Nikolai & Lehmann, Sebastian & Paulick, Sebastia, 2016. "Lessons learned from applying a forest gap model to understand ecosystem and carbon dynamics of complex tropical forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 124-133.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:11:p:4768-:d:370005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.