IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i9p2629-d228971.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Culture Development for Sustainable SMEs: Toward a Behavioral Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Nuttasorn Ketprapakorn

    (School of Business, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

  • Sooksan Kantabutra

    (Center for Research on Sustainable Leadership, College of Management, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)

Abstract

The present study derives culture development practices among “sustainable” small and medium enterprises (SMEs)that adopt the Thai philosophy of the sufficiency economy. It adopts multiple data collection methods including non-participant observations made during visits to five “sustainable” enterprises, and references internal and published documents among other information about the case enterprises, including annual reports, previous studies about the companies and news reports. In-depth interview sessions were held with top management team members and employees, including CEOs or MDs, and division/functional heads. The “grounded theory” is adopted as an approach to analyze the data. The analysis reveals six emerging organizational culture development practices: identifying virtues, social and environmental responsibility and innovation as core values; leaders acting as models according to these values; growing their own managers to continue their corporate cultures; designing communication channels to emphasize the core values among employees; using the core values as criteria to recruit new employees; avoiding employee layoff to preserve the core values even in times of financial crisis. Limitations and future research directions to develop a behavioral theory of sustainability culture in organizational settings, as well as managerial implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuttasorn Ketprapakorn & Sooksan Kantabutra, 2019. "Culture Development for Sustainable SMEs: Toward a Behavioral Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2629-:d:228971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2629/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2629/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sooksan Kantabutra, 2017. "A Thai Rhineland leadership model: in search for corporate sustainability model for Asia," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 16-40.
    2. Sooksan Kantabutra & Thachapong Thepha-Aphiraks, 2016. "Sustainable leadership and consequences at Thailand's Kasikornbank," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 253-273.
    3. Ilke Oruc & Muammer Sarikaya, 2011. "Normative stakeholder theory in relation to ethics of care," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(3), pages 381-392, August.
    4. repec:eme:srjpps:v:6:y:2010:i:2:p:381-392 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Sooksan Kantabutra & Suparak Suriyankietkaew, 2013. "Sustainable leadership: Rhineland practices at a Thai small enterprise," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(1), pages 77-94.
    6. Sooksan Kantabutra, 2017. "Exploring the corporate sustainability process: a Thai perspective," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(2), pages 170-189.
    7. Hosseini, Jamshid C. & Brenner, Steven N., 1992. "The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: A Methodology to Generate Value Matrix Weights," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 99-119, April.
    8. Phillips, Robert & Freeman, R. Edward & Wicks, Andrew C., 2003. "What Stakeholder Theory is Not," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 479-502, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wadim Strielkowski & Irina Firsova & Svetlana Azarova & Irina Shatskaya, 2022. "Novel Insights in the Leadership in Business and Economics: A Post-Coronavirus Update," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Sooksan Kantabutra, 2019. "Achieving Corporate Sustainability: Toward a Practical Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-39, August.
    3. Qiuzhen Ren & Yingjie Xu & Ranran Zhou & Jingdong Liu, 2020. "Can CEO’s Humble Leadership Behavior Really Improve Enterprise Performance and Sustainability? A Case Study of Chinese Start-Up Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Isensee, Carmen & Griese, Kai-Michael & Teuteberg, Frank, 2022. "Sustainable Artificial Intelligence im Marketing am Beispiel des SDG 12," PraxisWISSEN Marketing: German Journal of Marketing, AfM – Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Marketing, vol. 7(01/2022), pages 33-46.
    5. Nuttasorn Ketprapakorn & Sooksan Kantabutra, 2019. "Sustainable Social Enterprise Model: Relationships and Consequences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-39, July.
    6. Ismail Kintu & Yusuf Kiwala & Faizo Buyinza, 2021. "Profiting with Values: A Qualitative Approach to SMEs in the Informal Economy of Uganda’s Central Region," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(12), pages 169-169, July.
    7. Sooksan Kantabutra, 2020. "Toward an Organizational Theory of Sustainability Vision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, February.
    8. Sharmin Taskin & Amna Javed & Youji Kohda, 2023. "Creating Shared Value in Banking by Offering Entrepreneurship Education to Female Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Jakret Mettathamrong & Phetphrairin Upping & Somchad Deeudom, 2023. "Approach to Applying Sufficiency Economy Philosophy in Community Enterprise Management towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Juhee Kim & Minju Shin, 2022. "What Drives Social Enterprises to Form Sustainable Values? The Effects of Normative Identity and Social Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Ana Carolina Bertassini & Aldo Roberto Ometto & Semih Severengiz & Mateus Cecilio Gerolamo, 2021. "Circular economy and sustainability: The role of organizational behaviour in the transition journey," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3160-3193, November.
    12. Jee Young Lee & Yumi Seo, 2019. "Are There Differences in the Effects of P-O and P-T Cultural Fits on Work Attitudes and Task Performance? The Moderating Effect of Supportive Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Hee‐Chan Song, 2020. "Sufficiency economy philosophy: Buddhism‐based sustainability framework in Thailand," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 2995-3005, December.
    14. Sooksan Kantabutra, 2021. "Exploring Relationships among Sustainability Organizational Culture Components at a Leading Asian Industrial Conglomerate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-32, February.
    15. Yingrun Chen & Yi Zhang, 2023. "Do Regional Cultural Differences Affects the Effect of Accounting Firms’ Merger: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    16. Mallika Devi Pathak & Brajaballav Kar & Madhu Chhanda Panda, 2022. "Chaos and complexity: entrepreneurial planning during pandemic," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Carmen Isensee & Frank Teuteberg & Kai Michael Griese, 2022. "Exploring the Use of Mobile Apps for Fostering Sustainability-Oriented Corporate Culture: A Qualitative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-25, June.
    18. Hernita Hernita & Batara Surya & Iwan Perwira & Herminawaty Abubakar & Muhammad Idris, 2021. "Economic Business Sustainability and Strengthening Human Resource Capacity Based on Increasing the Productivity of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Makassar City, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-36, March.
    19. Carmen Isensee & Kai-Michael Griese & Frank Teuteberg, 2021. "Sustainable artificial intelligence: A corporate culture perspective [Sustainable artificial intelligence: Eine unternehmenskulturelle Perspektive]," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 217-230, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sooksan Kantabutra, 2019. "Achieving Corporate Sustainability: Toward a Practical Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-39, August.
    2. Nuttasorn Ketprapakorn & Sooksan Kantabutra, 2019. "Sustainable Social Enterprise Model: Relationships and Consequences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-39, July.
    3. Mahoney, Joseph & Asher, Cheryl Carleton & Mahoney, James, 2004. "Towards a Property Rights Foundation for a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm," Working Papers 04-0116, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    4. Warat Winit & Sooksan Kantabutra, 2022. "Enhancing the Prospect of Corporate Sustainability via Brand Equity: A Stakeholder Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Sooksan Kantabutra & Prattana Punnakitikashem, 2020. "Exploring the Process Toward Corporate Sustainability at a Thai SME," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Melinda Timea FÜLÖP & Mirela-Oana PINTEA, 2014. "Effects Of The New Regulation And Corporate Governance Of The Audit Profession," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 4, pages 545-554, July.
    7. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    8. Ruben Burga & Davar Rezania, 2016. "Stakeholder theory in social entrepreneurship: a descriptive case study," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Hans De Geer & Tommy Borglund & Magnus Frostenson, 2009. "Reconciling CSR with the Role of the Corporation in Welfare States: The Problematic Swedish Example," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 269-283, November.
    10. Kourula, Arno, 2010. "Corporate engagement with non-governmental organizations in different institutional contexts--A case study of a forest products company," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 395-404, October.
    11. Nina Evans & Janet Sawyer, 2010. "CSR and stakeholders of small businesses in regional South Australia," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(3), pages 433-451, August.
    12. Adam Arian & John Sands & Stuart Tooley, 2023. "Industry and Stakeholder Impacts on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Financial Performance: Consumer vs. Industrial Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Austen Agata, 2012. "Stakeholders management in public hospitals in the context of resources," Management, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 217-230, December.
    14. Andrew West, 2016. "Applying Metaethical and Normative Claims of Moral Relativism to (Shareholder and Stakeholder) Models of Corporate Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 199-215, May.
    15. George Silviu CORDOȘ & Melinda Times FÜLÖP, 2014. "Audit Reporting And Corporate Governance: Links And Implications," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 3, pages 146-154, April.
    16. Anagnostopoulou, Seraina C. & Tsekrekos, Andrianos E. & Voulgaris, Georgios, 2021. "Accounting conservatism and corporate social responsibility," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(4).
    17. Robbin Derry, 2012. "Reclaiming Marginalized Stakeholders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 111(2), pages 253-264, December.
    18. Sybille Sachs & Edwin Rühli & Claude Meier, 2010. "Stakeholder Governance as a Response to Wicked Issues," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 57-64, August.
    19. Elise Perrault, 2017. "A ‘Names-and-Faces Approach’ to Stakeholder Identification and Salience: A Matter of Status," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 25-38, November.
    20. Lorenzo Sacconi, 2007. "A Social Contract Account for CSR as an Extended Model of Corporate Governance (II): Compliance, Reputation and Reciprocity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 77-96, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:2629-:d:228971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.