IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i8p2413-d225313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Introduction to System Dynamics Approach to Operational Efficiency and Sustainability of Dry Port’s Main Parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitri Muravev

    (Department of Transportation Engineering, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering and State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    Department of Logistics and Transportation Systems Management, Mining Engineering and Transport Institute, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk 455000, Russia)

  • Aleksandr Rakhmangulov

    (Department of Logistics and Transportation Systems Management, Mining Engineering and Transport Institute, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk 455000, Russia)

  • Hao Hu

    (Department of Transportation Engineering, School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering and State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Hengshuo Zhou

    (Sino-US Global Logistics Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

Abstract

The continuous increase of trade between China and Europe brought congestion problems at major Chinese seaports. An effective way to solve this issue is to set up intermodal terminals often called dry ports. However, the dynamics of various influenced factors on dry port’s implementation calls for the adaptive and flexible planning of the terminal. This paper analyzes the shortcomings of previous research related to the dry port’s implementation from the perspective of the applied numerous parameters concerning evaluating its operational efficiency and sustainability. The operational efficiency and sustainability of a dry port are evaluated by the developed system of the main parameters. This system gives the understanding of how these parameters are interrelated between each other and fills the gap in studies of inverse interrelations between main parameters of a dry port. To fully understand the sustainability of the main parameters of a dry port, this paper puts forward the simulation models description of the developed system. The developed model is a practical tool to evaluate the reliability of hypotheses about the functional interrelations between the main parameters of the dry port, as well as to evaluate the sustainability of the system. Finally, in order to develop functional interrelations between main parameters, the data from several Chinese dry ports has been collected. Finally, the developed multi-agent system dynamics model has been validated in the case study of Yiwu dry port located in Zhejiang, China.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitri Muravev & Aleksandr Rakhmangulov & Hao Hu & Hengshuo Zhou, 2019. "The Introduction to System Dynamics Approach to Operational Efficiency and Sustainability of Dry Port’s Main Parameters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2413-:d:225313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2413/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2413/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Modeling and Design of Container Terminal Operations," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-008-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. Roso, Violeta & Woxenius, Johan & Lumsden, Kenth, 2009. "The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 338-345.
    3. Zhao, Laijun & Zhao, Yue & Hu, Qingmi & Li, Huiyong & Stoeter, Johan, 2018. "Evaluation of consolidation center cargo capacity and loctions for China railway express," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 58-81.
    4. Sophia Everett & Ross Robinson, 1998. "Port reform in Australia: issues in the ownership debate," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 41-62, January.
    5. Lättilä, Lauri & Henttu, Ville & Hilmola, Olli-Pekka, 2013. "Hinterland operations of sea ports do matter: Dry port usage effects on transportation costs and CO2 emissions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 23-42.
    6. A Beresford & S Pettit & Q Xu & S Williams, 2012. "A study of dry port development in China," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 14(1), pages 73-98, March.
    7. Ross Robinson, 2002. "Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 241-255.
    8. Aleksandr Rakhmangulov & Dmitri Muravev, 2016. "The Development of the Regional Sea Port Infrastructure on the Basis of Dry Port," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 924-936.
    9. Mary R. Brooks & Thanos Pallis & Stephen Perkins, 2014. "Port Investment and Container Shipping Markets: Roundtable Summary and Conclusions," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2014/3, OECD Publishing.
    10. Davis, J.D. & Macknight, S., 1990. "Environmental Considerations For Port And Harbor Developments," Papers 126, World Bank - Technical Papers.
    11. Henttu, Ville & Hilmola, Olli-Pekka, 2011. "Financial and environmental impacts of hypothetical Finnish dry port structure," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 35-41.
    12. Jason Monios & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2012. "Port-centric logistics, dry ports and offshore logistics hubs: strategies to overcome double peripherality?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 207-226, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Min Wang & Meng Ji & Xiaofen Wu & Kexin Deng & Xiaodong Jing, 2023. "Analysis on Evaluation and Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Port Cluster Eco-Efficiency: Case Study from the Yangtze River Delta in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Ján Ližbetin & Ondrej Stopka, 2020. "Application of Specific Mathematical Methods in the Context of Revitalization of Defunct Intermodal Transport Terminal: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Biyi Zhou & Hao Hu & Lei Dai, 2020. "Assessment of the Development of Time-Sharing Electric Vehicles in Shanghai and Subsidy Implications: A System Dynamics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Egor PLOTNIKOV & Aleksandr RAKHMANGULOV, 2021. "Modeling China'S Dry Port Cooperation In Supply Chains," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 16(3), pages 89-103, September.
    2. de Almeida Rodrigues, Thiago & Maria de Miranda Mota, Caroline & Manuele dos Santos, Inez, 2021. "Determining dry port criteria that support decision making," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Thanh, Vo-Van, 2019. "A multi-objective mixed robust possibilistic flexible programming approach for sustainable seaport-dry port network design under an uncertain environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 13-39.
    4. Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić & Violeta Roso & Nikolina Brnjac, 2020. "Dry Port Terminal Location Selection by Applying the Hybrid Grey MCDM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Chakat Chueadee & Preecha Kriengkorakot & Nuchsara Kriengkorakot, 2022. "MDEALNS for Solving the Tapioca Starch Logistics Network Problem for the Land Port of Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Ercan Kurtulus & Ismail Bilge Cetin, 2019. "Assessing the Environmental Benefits of Dry Port Usage: A Case of Inland Container Transport in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Alena Khaslavskaya & Violeta Roso, 2020. "Dry ports: research outcomes, trends, and future implications," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(2), pages 265-292, June.
    8. Qiu, Xuan & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Huang, George Q., 2015. "A bilevel storage pricing model for outbound containers in a dry port system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 65-83.
    9. Alena Khaslavskaya & Violeta Roso, 2019. "Outcome-Driven Supply Chain Perspective on Dry Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.
    11. Weidong Li & Olli-Pekka Hilmola & Yulia Panova, 2019. "Container Sea Ports and Dry Ports: Future CO 2 Emission Reduction Potential in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Wan, Shulin & Luan, Weixin & Chen, Yuying & Lin, Qiaoqiao, 2022. "Influence of dry ports construction on seaport growth: Case of Ningbo Zhoushan Port," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 40-47.
    13. Erica Varese & Danilo Stefano Marigo & Mariarosaria Lombardi, 2020. "Dry Port: A Review on Concept, Classification, Functionalities and Technological Processes," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Yiran Sun & Yuqian Wang & Jingci Xie, 2022. "The co-evolution of seaports and dry ports in Shandong province in China under the Belt and Road Initiative," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, December.
    15. Qiu, Xuan & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2019. "Quantity discount pricing for rail transport in a dry port system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 563-580.
    16. Bask, Anu & Roso, Violeta & Andersson, Dan & Hämäläinen, Erkki, 2014. "Development of seaport–dry port dyads: two cases from Northern Europe," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 85-95.
    17. Witte, Patrick & Wiegmans, Bart & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2019. "A critical review on the evolution and development of inland port research," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 53-61.
    18. Talley, Wayne K. & Ng, ManWo, 2018. "Hinterland transport chains: A behavioral examination approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 94-98.
    19. Xie, Yangyang & Liang, Xiaoying & Ma, Lijun & Yan, Houmin, 2017. "Empty container management and coordination in intermodal transport," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 223-232.
    20. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2012. "Giving a direction to port regionalisation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1551-1561.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2413-:d:225313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.