IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i8p2332-d223981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Territorial Cognition, Behavior, and Space of Residents: A Comparative Study of Territoriality between Open and Gated Housing Blocks; a Case Study of Changchun, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiayu Huang

    (Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North 13, West 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan)

  • Suguru Mori

    (Division of Architectural and Structural Design, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Kita13 Nishi8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan)

  • Rie Nomura

    (Division of Architectural and Structural Design, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Kita13 Nishi8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan)

Abstract

Residents have territorial cognition with different hierarchies and conduct corresponding behaviors in the outdoor space of housing blocks through sharing space and facilities. This mechanism stems from human need and might be influenced by physical environmental elements. To understand this effect, especially after a guideline for transforming existing gated housing blocks was enacted in China, this study compared the territoriality of open and gated housing blocks from the view of the cognition, behavior, and space through combined methods. Interview, snapshot, and observation were conducted to capture the situation of these three dimensions, then they were evaluated and grouped by factor analysis and quartiles. Obtained results in the open housing block were found to be inferior to that in the gated case. The conclusion was drawn based on the above that there are remarkable differences between open and gated housing blocks on the intensity of residents’ territorial cognition, the level and quantity of their territorial behaviors, and the distribution as well as continuity of the territorial space.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiayu Huang & Suguru Mori & Rie Nomura, 2019. "Territorial Cognition, Behavior, and Space of Residents: A Comparative Study of Territoriality between Open and Gated Housing Blocks; a Case Study of Changchun, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2332-:d:223981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2332/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2332/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiayu Huang & Suguru Mori & Rie Nomura, 2018. "Comparing Characteristics of Environmental Behaviors and Spatial Types in Open and Gated Housing Blocks: A Case Study of Changchun, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Har Ye Kan & Ann Forsyth & Peter Rowe, 2017. "Redesigning China’s superblock neighbourhoods: policies, opportunities and challenges," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 757-777, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scoppa, Martin & Bawazir, Khawla & Alawadi, Khaled, 2019. "Straddling boundaries in superblock cities. Assessing local and global network connectivity using cases from Abu Dhabi, UAE," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 770-782.
    2. Barrington-Leigh, Christopher Paul & Millard-Ball, Adam, 2019. "A global assessment of street network sprawl," OSF Preprints 6vp8j, Center for Open Science.
    3. Tuomo Joensuu & Markku Norvasuo & Harry Edelman, 2019. "Stakeholders’ Interests in Developing an Energy Ecosystem for the Superblock—Case Hiedanranta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Jiayu Huang & Suguru Mori & Rie Nomura, 2018. "Comparing Characteristics of Environmental Behaviors and Spatial Types in Open and Gated Housing Blocks: A Case Study of Changchun, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2332-:d:223981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.