IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i21p5885-d279456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Runoff Predicting and Variation Analysis in Upper Ganjiang Basin under Projected Climate Changes

Author

Listed:
  • Chao Deng

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
    College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Weiguang Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
    College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

Abstract

Catchment runoff is significantly affected by climate condition changes. Predicting the runoff and analyzing its variations under future climates play a vital role in water security, water resource management, and the sustainable development of the catchment. In traditional hydrological modeling, fixed model parameters are usually used to transfer the global climate models (GCMs) to runoff, while the hydrologic model parameters may be time-varying. It is more appropriate to use the time-variant parameter for runoff modeling. This is achieved by incorporating the time-variant parameter approach into a two-parameter water balance model (TWBM) through the construction of time-variant parameter functions based on the identified catchment climate indicators. Using the Ganjiang Basin with an outlet of the Dongbei Hydrological Station as the study area, we developed time-variant parameter scenarios of the TWBM model and selected the best-performed parameter functions to predict future runoff and analyze its variations under the climate model projection of the BCC-CSM1.1(m). To synthetically assess the model performance improvements using the time-variant parameter approach, an index Δ was developed by combining the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency, the volume error, the Box–Cox transformed root-mean-square error, and the Kling–Gupta efficiency with equivalent weight. The results show that the TWBM model with time-variant C (evapotranspiration parameter) and SC (water storage capacity of catchment), where growing and non-growing seasons are considered for C , outperformed the model with constant parameters with a Δ value of approximately 5% and 10% for the calibration and validation periods, respectively. The mean annual values of runoff predictions under the four representative concentration pathways (RCPs) exhibited a decreasing trend over the future three decades (2021–2050) when compared to the runoff simulations in the baseline period (1982–2011), where the values were about −9.9%, −19.5%, −16.6%, and −11.4% for the RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5, respectively. The decreasing trend of future precipitation exerts impacts on runoff decline. Generally, the mean monthly changes of runoff predictions showed a decreasing trend from January to August for almost all of the RCPs, while an increasing trend existed from September to November, along with fluctuations among different RCPs. This study can provide beneficial references to comprehensively understand the impacts of climate change on runoff prediction and thus improve the regional strategy for future water resource management.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao Deng & Weiguang Wang, 2019. "Runoff Predicting and Variation Analysis in Upper Ganjiang Basin under Projected Climate Changes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:5885-:d:279456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/5885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ding, Yimin & Wang, Weiguang & Song, Ruiming & Shao, Quanxi & Jiao, Xiyun & Xing, Wanqiu, 2017. "Modeling spatial and temporal variability of the impact of climate change on rice irrigation water requirements in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 89-101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oludare Sunday Durodola & Khaldoon A. Mourad, 2020. "Modelling the Impacts of Climate Change on Soybeans Water Use and Yields in Ogun-Ona River Basin, Nigeria," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Ahmed Awad & Wan Luo & Nadhir Al-Ansari & Ahmed Elbeltagi & Mustafa El-Rawy & Hesham N. Farres & Mohamed EL-Sayed Gabr, 2021. "Farmers’ Awareness in the Context of Climate Change: An Underutilized Way for Ensuring Sustainable Farmland Adaptation and Surface Water Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Luo, Wanqi & Chen, Mengting & Kang, Yinhong & Li, Wenping & Li, Dan & Cui, Yuanlai & Khan, Shahbaz & Luo, Yufeng, 2022. "Analysis of crop water requirements and irrigation demands for rice: Implications for increasing effective rainfall," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Kun Jia & Wei Zhang & Bingyan Xie & Xitong Xue & Feng Zhang & Dongrui Han, 2022. "Does Climate Change Increase Crop Water Requirements of Winter Wheat and Summer Maize in the Lower Reaches of the Yellow River Basin?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Xiujuan Yang & Jiying Sun & Julin Gao & Shuaishuai Qiao & Baolin Zhang & Haizhu Bao & Xinwei Feng & Songyu Wang, 2021. "Effects of Climate Change on Cultivation Patterns and Climate Suitability of Spring Maize in Inner Mongolia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Wu, Dong & Fang, Shibo & Li, Xuan & He, Di & Zhu, Yongchao & Yang, Zaiqiang & Xu, Jiaxin & Wu, Yingjie, 2019. "Spatial-temporal variation in irrigation water requirement for the winter wheat-summer maize rotation system since the 1980s on the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 78-86.
    7. Ding, Yimin & Wang, Weiguang & Zhuang, Qianlai & Luo, Yufeng, 2020. "Adaptation of paddy rice in China to climate change: The effects of shifting sowing date on yield and irrigation water requirement," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    8. Xi Wang & Zhanyan Liu & Huili Chen, 2022. "Investigating Flood Impact on Crop Production under a Comprehensive and Spatially Explicit Risk Evaluation Framework," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Jia, Kun & Yang, Yanzhao & Dong, Guanglong & Zhang, Chao & Lang, Tingting, 2021. "Variation and determining factor of winter wheat water requirements under climate change," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    10. Yong-zong Lu & Peng-fei Liu & Aliasghar Montazar & Kyaw-Tha Paw U & Yong-guang Hu, 2019. "Soil Water Infiltration Model for Sprinkler Irrigation Control Strategy: A Case for Tea Plantation in Yangtze River Region," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-11, September.
    11. Kim, Seokhyeon & Hwang, Soonho & Song, Jung-Hun & Lee, Hyunji & Kang, Moon-Seong, 2023. "Impact of irrigation reservoirs on budget of the watershed-scale water cycle under climate change," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    12. Ruiming, Fang & Shijie, Song, 2020. "Daily reference evapotranspiration prediction of Tieguanyin tea plants based on mathematical morphology clustering and improved generalized regression neural network," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    13. Geng, Qingling & Zhao, Yongkun & Sun, Shikun & He, Xiaohui & Wang, Dong & Wu, Dingrong & Tian, Zhihui, 2023. "Spatio-temporal changes and its driving forces of irrigation water requirements for cotton in Xinjiang, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    14. Diego Portalanza & Finbarr G. Horgan & Valeria Pohlmann & Santiago Vianna Cuadra & Malena Torres-Ulloa & Eduardo Alava & Simone Ferraz & Angelica Durigon, 2022. "Potential Impact of Future Climates on Rice Production in Ecuador Determined Using Kobayashi’s ‘Very Simple Model’," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:5885-:d:279456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.