IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i18p4823-d263935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Design Thinking-Based Study of the Prospect of the Sustainable Development of Traditional Handicrafts

Author

Listed:
  • Wen-Tao Li

    (Graduate School of Design, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Yunlin 640, Taiwan)

  • Ming-Chyuan Ho

    (College of Design, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Yunlin 640, Taiwan)

  • Chun Yang

    (Graduate School of Design, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Yunlin 640, Taiwan)

Abstract

Traditional handicrafts have a time-honored history and tremendous cultural value in China. However, even with the strong impact of globalization and consumerism in recent years, design-oriented scientific thinking and sustainable development models are not yet available. Based on Stanford Design Thinking, this study explores the prospect of the sustainable development of traditional handicrafts. First, a literature review and analysis were conducted to show that design science, as a bridge between natural science and humanities, aims to improve the important methods and research tools for the sustainable development of traditional handicrafts. Then, we studied ceramic product design via workshops. Methods such as action research, expert questionnaires, and factor analysis were adopted to establish 24 “indicators of the sustainable value of handicraft design” and four value dimensions, namely, “material and innovative value”, “handicraft and cultural value”, “empirical and local value”, and “sharing and interactive value”. Next, an experimental method was employed to make design product prototypes according to the design-thinking procedure. These prototypes were measured and evaluated with the indicators to form an evaluation report. In addition, the exploration of the sustainable development of traditional handicraft design also contributes to the establishment of a sustainable development model of design thinking. It was demonstrated that scientific design is the current trend and future of the sustainable development of traditional handicrafts. Finally, this study put forward five dynamic thinking methods and design strategies, providing the most direct methods and theoretical evidence for the sustainable development of traditional handicraft design. Finally, taking design thinking as the sustainable design framework, five dynamic thinking approaches were proposed: Thinking with the body, thinking with the mind, thinking with the heart, thinking with the hands, and thinking with the soul. Five design strategies were also proposed: Enquiry learning, values education, future problem solving, experiential design, and appropriate assessment. These approaches and strategies provide the most direct method and theoretical basis for the future of sustainable design regarding traditional Chinese handicraft products.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen-Tao Li & Ming-Chyuan Ho & Chun Yang, 2019. "A Design Thinking-Based Study of the Prospect of the Sustainable Development of Traditional Handicrafts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-26, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4823-:d:263935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4823/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4823/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying Dai & Shyh-Huei Hwang, 2019. "Technique, Creativity, and Sustainability of Bamboo Craft Courses: Teaching Educational Practices for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Xiaofang Zhan & Stuart Walker, 2018. "Value Direction: Moving Crafts toward Sustainability in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Wen-Tao Li & Ming-Chyuan Ho & Chun Yang, 2018. "Study on Design Strategy for Sustainable Development of Chinese Solar Term Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Elina Härkönen & Maria Huhmarniemi & Timo Jokela, 2018. "Crafting Sustainability: Handcraft in Contemporary Art and Cultural Sustainability in the Finnish Lapland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Yongzhong Yang & Mohsin Shafi & Xiaoting Song & Ruo Yang, 2018. "Preservation of Cultural Heritage Embodied in Traditional Crafts in the Developing Countries. A Case Study of Pakistani Handicraft Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Garrath T. Wilson & Tracy Bhamra, 2020. "Design for Sustainability: The Need for a New Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-8, April.
    2. Jui-Che Tu & Xu Zhang & Xiu-Yue Zhang, 2021. "Basic Courses of Design Major Based on the ADDIE Model: Shed Light on Response to Social Trends and Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Yi-Fang Kao & Hung-Cheng Chen & Jung-Hua Lo, 2023. "Exploring an Interdisciplinary Curriculum in Product and Media Design Education: Knowledge Innovation and Competency Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Roy, Subhadip & Mohapatra, Subhalaxmi, 2023. "Exploring the culture–creativity–innovation triad in the handicraft industry using an interpretive approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohsin Shafi & Md Nazirul Islam Sarker & Liu Junrong, 2019. "Social Network of Small Creative Firms and Its Effects on Innovation in Developing Countries," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(4), pages 21582440198, December.
    2. Yongzhong Yang & Mohsin Shafi, 2020. "How does customer and supplier cooperation in micro-enterprises affect innovation? Evidence from Pakistani handicraft micro-enterprises," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(5), pages 530-559, November.
    3. Mohsin Shafi & Liu Junrong & Yongzhong Yang & Deng Jian & Imran UR Rahman & Mahdi Moudi, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Consumer Acceptance of Innovation in Handicraft Products," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    4. Yongzhong Yang & Mohsin Shafi, 0. "How does customer and supplier cooperation in micro-enterprises affect innovation? Evidence from Pakistani handicraft micro-enterprises," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-30.
    5. Roy, Subhadip & Mohapatra, Subhalaxmi, 2023. "Exploring the culture–creativity–innovation triad in the handicraft industry using an interpretive approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    6. Wen-Tao Li & Ming-Chyuan Ho & Chun Yang, 2018. "Study on Design Strategy for Sustainable Development of Chinese Solar Term Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Benzarour, Choukri, 2022. "التدخل لتحسين أدوار ونتائج قطاع الحرف اليدوية في الجزائر: التطلع إلى المستقبل، وتحديد عناصر الممارسة الفعالة [Intervening to improve roles and outcomes of Algerian handicraft sector: Looking to the," MPRA Paper 112833, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Wojciech Połeć & Daria Murawska, 2021. "The Social Constraints on the Preservation and Sustainable Development of Traditional Crafts in a Developed Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Piotr F. Borowski & Iaroslav Patuk & Erick R. Bandala, 2022. "Innovative Industrial Use of Bamboo as Key “Green” Material," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, February.
    10. Baosheng Wang & Tie Ji & Renke He, 2023. "Empowerment or Disempowerment: The (Dis)empowering Processes and Outcomes of Co-Designing with Rural Craftspeople," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, March.
    11. Nan Yang & Xiaoge Zang & Cong Chen, 2022. "Inheritance Patterns under Cultural Ecology Theory for the Sustainable Development of Traditional Handicrafts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Bach Q. Ho, 2024. "Customers’ Prior Knowledge in the Servitization of Traditional Handicrafts," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, February.
    13. Liting Zhou & Fei Ouyang & Yan Sun & Wentao Chen & Yiyong Li & Ruyu Zhao, 2022. "Integrated Sustainable Development of Culture into Tourist Map Design: A Case from Foshan, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, October.
    14. Xiaoting Song & Yongzhong Yang & Ruo Yang & Mohsin Shafi, 2019. "Keeping Watch on Intangible Cultural Heritage: Live Transmission and Sustainable Development of Chinese Lacquer Art," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    15. Wenyu Lv & Di Dai & Renjie Wei & Lanlan Bai, 2023. "Restoration of the Nanjing Circumvallation in Sustainable Urban Planning: Application of Environmental Ethical Decision-Making Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    16. Zhe Liu & Pieter Uyttenhove & Xin Zheng, 2018. "Moving Urban Sculptures towards Sustainability: The Urban Sculpture Planning System in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, December.
    17. Chong Shin & Dilah Tuah & Yusriadi Yusriadi, 2022. "An Initial Qualitative Exploration of Economic, Cultural, and Language Changes in Telok Melano, Sarawak, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Yi-Kai Juan & Yu-Ching Cheng & Yeng-Horng Perng, 2019. "Preparations for Developing a World Design Capital: The Case of Taipei City Transformation Process in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Wen-Jie Yan & Shang-Chia Chiou, 2020. "Dimensions of Customer Value for the Development of Digital Customization in the Clothing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-27, June.
    20. ElSayed A. Elnashar & Liliana Indrie & Dorina Camelia Ilieş & Zlatin Zlatev & Grigore Vasile Herman & Cristina Secan & Jan A. Wendt, 2022. "Rare Romanian Ethnographic Textiles—Reverse Engineering of Fabrics for Fashion Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4823-:d:263935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.