IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i13p3511-d243231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negotiating Improved Multifunctional Landscape Use: Trails as Facilitators for Collaboration Among Stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Kristin Godtman Kling

    (Department of Economics, Geography, Law and Tourism, Mid-Sweden University, Kunskapens väg 1, S-831 25 Östersund, Sweden)

  • Annika Dahlberg

    (Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Sandra Wall-Reinius

    (Department of Economics, Geography, Law and Tourism, Mid-Sweden University, Kunskapens väg 1, S-831 25 Östersund, Sweden)

Abstract

Trails are significant features in landscapes, and many ancient pathways have developed into routes of great importance for recreation and tourism in contemporary societies. Nevertheless, international research on recreational trails has hitherto mainly focused on managerial and environmental aspects of trails and less on trails from a social science perspective, such as conflict management. This study explores the role of recreational trails as a potential tool for managing conflicts in a multifunctional landscape. The findings originate from a case study of the southern Jämtland mountain region in Sweden, an area where land-use conflicts exist and where tourism is a major concern. The study examines the recreational trail as an applied example where actors in the mountain landscape “negotiate” and collaborate. through the recreational trail, dialogue and discussions are made possible among stakeholders. Findings show that trails can function as facilitators for communication and can thus enhance the possibilities of building trust and promoting collaboration between actors. This research contributes to the existing literature on handling multiple land-use interests and adds to previous knowledge by taking on a rather new approach, where the recreational trail becomes a facilitator for communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristin Godtman Kling & Annika Dahlberg & Sandra Wall-Reinius, 2019. "Negotiating Improved Multifunctional Landscape Use: Trails as Facilitators for Collaboration Among Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3511-:d:243231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3511/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/13/3511/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henrik Vejre & Jens Abildtrup & Niels Kærgaard & Bo Fritzb�ger & Anne Gravsholt Busck & S�ren B�ye Olsen, 2012. "Revitalisation of Common Use in Management of Modern Multifunctional Landscapes," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 637-657, December.
    2. Zachrisson, Anna & Beland Lindahl, Karin, 2013. "Conflict resolution through collaboration: Preconditions and limitations in forest and nature conservation controversies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 39-46.
    3. Zawalińska, Katarzyna & Milczarek-Andrzejewska, Dominika, 2017. "Land Use Conflicts And The Common Agricultural Policy: The Case Of Poland," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 260883, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Milczarek-Andrzejewska, Dominika & Zawalińska, Katarzyna & Czarnecki, Adam, 2018. "Land-use conflicts and the Common Agricultural Policy: Evidence from Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 423-433.
    5. Carsten Mann & James Absher, 2008. "Recreation conflict potential and management implications in the northern/central Black Forest Nature Park," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3), pages 363-380.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Li & Zhanwei Zhang & Yang Zhou, 2021. "Policy Strategies to Revive Rural Land in Peri-Metropolitan Towns: Resource Identification, Capitalization, and Financialization," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Wei Li & Yang Zhou & Zhanwei Zhang, 2021. "Strategies of Landscape Planning in Peri-Urban Rural Tourism: A Comparison between Two Villages in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Piotr Dynowski & Anna Zrobek-Sokolnik & Izabela Jablonska-Barna, 2021. "Determining the Range of Influence of Tourist Trails Users on Naturally Valuable Areas: A Proposal of a Method and a Practical Example," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 560-575.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee & Ludvig, Alice & Hogl, Karl, 2020. "Innovation development in forest ecosystem services: A comparative mountain bike trail study from Austria and Switzerland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    2. HaeOk Choi, 2020. "Geospatial Data Approach for Demand-Oriented Policies of Land Administration," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Kai Ren & Jianqiang Yang, 2019. "Social Landscape Optimization of Towns and Villages at the County Level by Developing a Compound Ecological Capital System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Dominika Milczarek-Andrzejewska & Jerzy Wilkin & Renata Marks-Bielska & Adam Czarnecki & Anna Bartczak, 2020. "Konflikty o ziemię rolną – perspektywa ekonomiczna," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 5-31.
    5. Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee & Ludvig, Alice, 2019. "The role of social innovation in negotiations about recreational infrastructure in forests – A mountain-bike case study in Switzerland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 227-235.
    6. Mohammad Rondhi & Pravitasari Anjar Pratiwi & Vivi Trisna Handini & Aryo Fajar Sunartomo & Subhan Arif Budiman, 2018. "Agricultural Land Conversion, Land Economic Value, and Sustainable Agriculture: A Case Study in East Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Lucia Palšová & Katarína Melichová & Ina Melišková, 2019. "Modelling Development, Territorial and Legislative Factors Impacting the Changes in Use of Agricultural Land in Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Andrzej Hornowski & Andrzej Parzonko & Pavel Kotyza & Tomasz Kondraszuk & Piotr Bórawski & Luboš Smutka, 2020. "Factors Determining the Development of Small Farms in Central and Eastern Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Sarkki, Simo & Heikkinen, Hannu I., 2015. "Why do environmentalists not consider compromises as legitimate?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 110-117.
    10. Laura Siegwald & Carmen de Jong, 2020. "Anthropogenic Impacts on Water Quality in a Small, Forested Mountain Catchment: A Case Study of the Seebächle, Black Forest, Southern Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Vejre, H. & Vesterager, J.P. & Andersen, P.S. & Olafsson, A.S. & Brandt, J. & Dalgaard, T., 2015. "Does cadastral division of area-based ecosystem services obstruct comprehensive management?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 295(C), pages 176-187.
    12. Niu, Hebin & Wang, Jinman & Jing, Zhaorui & Liu, Biao, 2023. "Identification and management of land use conflicts in mining cities: A case study of Shuozhou in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Ma, Wenqiu & Jiang, Guanghui & Chen, Yunhao & Qu, Yanbo & Zhou, Tao & Li, Wenqing, 2020. "How feasible is regional integration for reconciling land use conflicts across the urban–rural interface? Evidence from Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei metropolitan region in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Joanna Wiśniewska-Paluszak & Grzegorz Paluszak, 2021. "The Urban and Peri-Urban Farms (UPFs) Relational Model: The Case of Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Ar. R. T. Hidayat & Corinthias P. M. Sianipar & Shizuka Hashimoto & Satoshi Hoshino & Muhammad Dimyati & Ahmad E. Yustika, 2023. "Personal Cognition and Implicit Constructs Affecting Preferential Decisions on Farmland Ownership: Multiple Case Studies in Kediri, East Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Guanglong Dong & Yibing Ge & Haiwei Jia & Chuanzhun Sun & Senyuan Pan, 2021. "Land Use Multi-Suitability, Land Resource Scarcity and Diversity of Human Needs: A New Framework for Land Use Conflict Identification," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Johannes Ziesmer & Ding Jin & Sneha D Thube & Christian Henning, 2023. "A Dynamic Baseline Calibration Procedure for CGE models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(4), pages 1331-1368, April.
    18. Zhiheng Yang & Nengneng Shen & Yanbo Qu & Bailin Zhang, 2021. "Association between Rural Land Use Transition and Urban–Rural Integration Development: From 2009 to 2018 Based on County-Level Data in Shandong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Jessica Cockburn & Eureta Rosenberg & Athina Copteros & Susanna Francina (Ancia) Cornelius & Notiswa Libala & Liz Metcalfe & Benjamin van der Waal, 2020. "A Relational Approach to Landscape Stewardship: Towards a New Perspective for Multi-Actor Collaboration," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    20. Cieślak, Iwona, 2019. "Identification of areas exposed to land use conflict with the use of multiple-criteria decision-making methods," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:13:p:3511-:d:243231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.