IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i6p1800-d149747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Morphology Dependent Assessment of Resilience for Urban Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Fischer

    (Fraunhofer Institute for High-Speed Dynamics, Ernst-Mach-Institut, 79104 Freiburg, Germany)

  • Stefan Hiermaier

    (Fraunhofer Institute for High-Speed Dynamics, Ernst-Mach-Institut, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
    Institute for Sustainable Technical Systems, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany)

  • Werner Riedel

    (Fraunhofer Institute for High-Speed Dynamics, Ernst-Mach-Institut, 79104 Freiburg, Germany)

  • Ivo Häring

    (Fraunhofer Institute for High-Speed Dynamics, Ernst-Mach-Institut, 79104 Freiburg, Germany)

Abstract

The formation of new threats and the increasing complexity of urban built infrastructures underline the need for more robust and sustainable systems, which are able to cope with adverse events. Achieving sustainability requires the strengthening of resilience. Currently, a comprehensive approach for the quantification of resilience of urban infrastructure is missing. Within this paper, a new generalized mathematical framework is presented. A clear definition of terms and their interaction builds the basis of this resilience assessment scheme. Classical risk-based as well as additional components are aligned along the timeline before, during and after disruptive events, to quantify the susceptibility, the vulnerability and the response and recovery behavior of complex systems for multiple threat scenarios. The approach allows the evaluation of complete urban surroundings and enables a quantitative comparison with other development plans or cities. A comprehensive resilience framework should cover at least preparation, prevention, protection, response and recovery. The presented approach determines respective indicators and provides decision support, which enhancement measures are more effective. Hence, the framework quantifies for instance, if it is better to avoid a hazardous event or to tolerate an event with an increased robustness. An application example is given to assess different urban forms, i.e., morphologies, with consideration of multiple adverse events, like terrorist attacks or earthquakes, and multiple buildings. Each urban object includes a certain number of attributes, like the object use, the construction type, the time-dependent number of persons and the value, to derive different performance targets. The assessment results in the identification of weak spots with respect to single resilience indicators. Based on the generalized mathematical formulation and suitable combination of indicators, this approach can quantify the resilience of urban morphologies, independent of possible single threat types and threat locations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Fischer & Stefan Hiermaier & Werner Riedel & Ivo Häring, 2018. "Morphology Dependent Assessment of Resilience for Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1800-:d:149747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1800/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1800/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Branscomb, Lewis M., 2006. "Sustainable cities: Safety and security," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 225-234.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wann-Ming Wey, 2018. "A Commentary on Sustainably Built Environments and Urban Growth Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-5, October.
    2. Olga Palusci & Carlo Cecere, 2022. "Urban Ventilation in the Compact City: A Critical Review and a Multidisciplinary Methodology for Improving Sustainability and Resilience in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-44, March.
    3. Alessandro Annarelli & Cinzia Battistella & Fabio Nonino, 2020. "A Framework to Evaluate the Effects of Organizational Resilience on Service Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Govindan, Rajesh & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2019. "Computational decision framework for enhancing resilience of the energy, water and food nexus in risky environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 653-668.
    2. Ulaa AlHaddad & Abdullah Basuhail & Maher Khemakhem & Fathy Elbouraey Eassa & Kamal Jambi, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Energy Grids: A Machine Learning-Based Ensemble Methods Approach for Outages Estimation in Extreme Weather Events," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Shunichi Hienuki, 2017. "Environmental and Socio-Economic Analysis of Naphtha Reforming Hydrogen Energy Using Input-Output Tables: A Case Study from Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Jingjing Pei & Wen Liu & Lu Han, 2019. "Research on Evaluation Index System of Chinese City Safety Resilience Based on Delphi Method and Cloud Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Alessandro Annarelli & Cinzia Battistella & Fabio Nonino, 2020. "A Framework to Evaluate the Effects of Organizational Resilience on Service Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Schlör, Holger & Venghaus, Sandra & Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, 2018. "The FEW-Nexus city index – Measuring urban resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 382-392.
    7. Benjamin McLellan & Qi Zhang & Hooman Farzaneh & N. Agya Utama & Keiichi N. Ishihara, 2012. "Resilience, Sustainability and Risk Management: A Focus on Energy," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-30, August.
    8. Bulu, Melih, 2014. "Upgrading a city via technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 63-67.
    9. Winter, Scott R. & Crouse, Sean R. & Rice, Stephen, 2021. "The development of ‘green’ airports: Which factors influence willingness to pay for sustainability and intention to act? A structural and mediation model analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1800-:d:149747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.