IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i10p3625-d174760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption and Utilization of Cactus Pear in South Asia—Smallholder Farmers’ Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Mounir Louhaichi

    (Resilient Agricultural Livelihood Systems Program, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Amman 11195, Jordan
    Department of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA)

  • Suresh Kumar

    (Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Jodhpur 342003, Rajasthan, India)

  • Sunil Tiwari

    (Indian Grassland & Fodder Research Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Jhansi (UP) 284003, India)

  • Muhammad Islam

    (Consultant Rangeland Management, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Sawsan Hassan

    (Resilient Agricultural Livelihood Systems Program, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Amman 11195, Jordan)

  • Om Parkash Yadav

    (Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Jodhpur 342003, Rajasthan, India)

  • Devi Dayal

    (Regional Research Station Kukma, Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Bhuj 370105, Gujarat, India)

  • Hloniphani Peter Moyo

    (Resilient Agricultural Livelihood Systems Program, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Amman 11195, Jordan)

  • Rahul Dev

    (Regional Research Station Kukma, Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Bhuj 370105, Gujarat, India)

  • Ashutosh Sarker

    (South Asia & China Regional Program, International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), New Delhi 110012, India)

Abstract

Livestock production in arid and semi-arid regions is facing the challenges of low and erratic rainfall, poor nutrient soils, and high temperatures, which all contribute to inadequate forage production to support livestock. Under these challenging conditions, promoting forage species, such as cacti, that are tolerant and well adapted is important to sustain and improve livestock production. This study analyzes the potential of adopting a spineless cactus through analysis of smallholder farmers’ perceptions with respect to its potential use as a livestock feed in South Asia. A total of 456 households were stratified into three groups in 2017: Farmers not familiar with cactus (non-adopters), farmers familiar with cactus but not growing it (potential adopters), and those already growing it (actual adopters). Main findings confirm that farmers already growing cactus are satisfied with its potential. A considerable proportion of non-adopter farmers cited the unavailability of plant material and technical information as the main reason for their lack of interest in cultivating spineless cactus. Therefore, the potential gains of livestock farming from spineless cactus production in the world’s dry areas could be immense, although more efforts, through farmer education and information sharing, are needed to ensure that the plant’s potential is effectively realized.

Suggested Citation

  • Mounir Louhaichi & Suresh Kumar & Sunil Tiwari & Muhammad Islam & Sawsan Hassan & Om Parkash Yadav & Devi Dayal & Hloniphani Peter Moyo & Rahul Dev & Ashutosh Sarker, 2018. "Adoption and Utilization of Cactus Pear in South Asia—Smallholder Farmers’ Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3625-:d:174760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3625/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3625/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Birthal, Pratap S. & Jha, Awadhesh K. & Tiongco, Marites & Narrod, Clare, 2008. "Improving farm-to-market linkages through contract farming: A case study of smallholder dairying in India," IFPRI discussion papers 814, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Robert Jensen, 2012. "Do Labor Market Opportunities Affect Young Women's Work and Family Decisions? Experimental Evidence from India," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 127(2), pages 753-792.
    3. Njabulo Lloyd Ntshangase & Brian Muroyiwa & Melusi Sibanda, 2018. "Farmers’ Perceptions and Factors Influencing the Adoption of No-Till Conservation Agriculture by Small-Scale Farmers in Zashuke, KwaZulu-Natal Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nkosomzi Sipango & Khuliso Emmanuel Ravhuhali & Nthabiseng Amenda Sebola & Onke Hawu & Monnye Mabelebele & Hilda Kwena Mokoboki & Bethwell Moyo, 2022. "Prickly Pear ( Opuntia spp.) as an Invasive Species and a Potential Fodder Resource for Ruminant Animals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Anandkumar Naorem & Mounir Louhaichi & Sawsan Hassan & Ashutosh Sarker & Shiva Kumar Udayana & Somasundaram Jayaraman & Sachin Patel, 2022. "Does Maturity Change the Chemical-Bromatological Makeup of Cladodes in Spineless Forage Cactus?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Prasenjit Acharya & Chandrashekhar Biradar & Mounir Louhaichi & Surajit Ghosh & Sawsan Hassan & Hloniphani Moyo & Ashutosh Sarker, 2019. "Finding a Suitable Niche for Cultivating Cactus Pear ( Opuntia ficus-indica ) as an Integrated Crop in Resilient Dryland Agroecosystems of India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gonzalez, Felipe & Prem, Mounu & von Dessauer, Cristine, 2023. "Empowerment or Indoctrination? Women Centers Under Dictatorship," SocArXiv 64mf9, Center for Open Science.
    2. Teresa Molina Millán & Karen Macours, 2017. "Attrition in randomized control trials: Using tracking information to correct bias," FEUNL Working Paper Series novaf:wp1702, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Economia.
    3. Augusto Mendoza Calderón, 2017. "El Efecto del Empleo sobre la Violencia Doméstica: Evidencia para las Mujeres Peruanas," Working Papers 99, Peruvian Economic Association.
    4. Bussolo,Maurizio & Ezebuihe,Jessy Amarachi & Munoz Boudet,Ana Maria & Poupakis,Stavros & Rahman,Tasmia & Sarma,Nayantara, 2022. "Social Norms and Gender Equality : A Descriptive Analysis for South Asia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10142, The World Bank.
    5. Isis Gaddis & Stephan Klasen, 2014. "Economic development, structural change, and women’s labor force participation:," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 27(3), pages 639-681, July.
    6. Caroline Krafft, 2020. "Why is fertility on the rise in Egypt? The role of women’s employment opportunities," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 1173-1218, October.
    7. Girum Abebe & A Stefano Caria & Marcel Fafchamps & Paolo Falco & Simon Franklin & Simon Quinn, 2021. "Anonymity or Distance? Job Search and Labour Market Exclusion in a Growing African City [Endogenous Stratification in Randomized Experiments]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(3), pages 1279-1310.
    8. Karthik Muralidharan & Nishith Prakash, 2017. "Cycling to School: Increasing Secondary School Enrollment for Girls in India," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(3), pages 321-350, July.
    9. Bruno Crépon & Gerard J. van den Berg, 2016. "Active Labor Market Policies," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 521-546, October.
    10. Faruque As Sunny & Linlin Fu & Md Sadique Rahman & Zuhui Huang, 2022. "Determinants and Impact of Solar Irrigation Facility (SIF) Adoption: A Case Study in Northern Bangladesh," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Cassan, Guilhem, 2019. "Affirmative action, education and gender: Evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 51-70.
    12. Bernard, Tanguy & Hidrobo, Melissa & Le Port, Agnès & Rawat, Rahul, 2017. "Nutrition incentives in dairy contract farming in northern Senegal," IFPRI discussion papers 1629, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Girum Abebe & Stefano Caria & Marcel Fafchamps & Paolo Falco & Simon Franklin & Simon Quinn, 2016. "Curse of Anonymity or Tyranny of Distance? The Impacts of Job-Search Support in Urban Ethiopia," CSAE Working Paper Series 2016-10, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    14. Nicolò Bird, 2020. "Evidence from global practices of active labour market policies for young people’s transition to work," Policy Research Brief 71, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
    15. Chakravorty, Bhaskar & Arulampalam, Wiji & Bhatiya, Apurav Yash & Imbert, Clement & Rathelot, Roland, 2021. "Can information about jobs improve the effectiveness of vocational training? Experimental evidence from India," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 567, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    16. Anh Tru Nguyen & Janet Dzator & Andrew Nadolny, 2018. "Contract farming, agriculture productivity and poverty reduction: evidence from tea estates in Viet Nam," Asia-Pacific Sustainable Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 25(1), pages 109-145, June.
    17. Demir, Banu & Cosar, Kerem & Ghose, Devaki & Young, Nathaniel, 2021. "Road Capacity, Domestic Trade and Regional Outcomes," CEPR Discussion Papers 16512, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Tsaneva, Magda, 2017. "Does school Matter? Learning outcomes of Indonesian children after dropping out of school," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 1-10.
    19. Abebe, Girum & Caria, Stefano & Fafchamps, Marcel & Falco, Paolo & Franklin, Simon & Quinn, Simon & Shilpi, Forhad, 2017. "Matching firms and workers in a field experiment in Ethiopia," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86572, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Jörg Peters & Jörg Langbein & Gareth Roberts, 2018. "Generalization in the Tropics – Development Policy, Randomized Controlled Trials, and External Validity," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 33(1), pages 34-64.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:10:p:3625-:d:174760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.