IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v7y2024i1p15-268d1347994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-Stage Limited-Information Estimation for Structural Equation Models of Round-Robin Variables

Author

Listed:
  • Terrence D. Jorgensen

    (Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 127, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Aditi M. Bhangale

    (Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 127, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Yves Rosseel

    (Center for Data Analysis and Statistical Science, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S9, 9000 Gent, Belgium)

Abstract

We propose and demonstrate a new two-stage maximum likelihood estimator for parameters of a social relations structural equation model (SR-SEM) using estimated summary statistics ( Σ ^ ) as data, as well as uncertainty about Σ ^ to obtain robust inferential statistics. The SR-SEM is a generalization of a traditional SEM for round-robin data, which have a dyadic network structure (i.e., each group member responds to or interacts with each other member). Our two-stage estimator is developed using similar logic as previous two-stage estimators for SEM, developed for application to multilevel data and multiple imputations of missing data. We demonstrate out estimator on a publicly available data set from a 2018 publication about social mimicry. We employ Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of Σ ^ in Stage 1, implemented using the R package rstan. In Stage 2, the posterior mean estimates of Σ ^ are used as input data to estimate SEM parameters with the R package lavaan. The posterior covariance matrix of estimated Σ ^ is also calculated so that lavaan can use it to calculate robust standard errors and test statistics. Results are compared to full-information maximum likelihood (FIML) estimation of SR-SEM parameters using the R package srm. We discuss how differences between estimators highlight the need for future research to establish best practices under realistic conditions (e.g., how to specify empirical Bayes priors in Stage 1), as well as extensions that would make 2-stage estimation particularly advantageous over single-stage FIML.

Suggested Citation

  • Terrence D. Jorgensen & Aditi M. Bhangale & Yves Rosseel, 2024. "Two-Stage Limited-Information Estimation for Structural Equation Models of Round-Robin Variables," Stats, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-34, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:7:y:2024:i:1:p:15-268:d:1347994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/7/1/15/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/7/1/15/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vermunt, Jeroen K., 2010. "Latent Class Modeling with Covariates: Two Improved Three-Step Approaches," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 450-469.
    2. Steffen Nestler, 2016. "Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Parameters of the Social Relations Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(4), pages 1098-1117, December.
    3. Imai, Kosuke & van Dyk, David A., 2005. "A Bayesian analysis of the multinomial probit model using marginal data augmentation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 311-334, February.
    4. Peter D. Hoff, 2009. "Multiplicative latent factor models for description and prediction of social networks," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 261-272, December.
    5. Lewandowski, Daniel & Kurowicka, Dorota & Joe, Harry, 2009. "Generating random correlation matrices based on vines and extended onion method," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(9), pages 1989-2001, October.
    6. Steffen Nestler & Oliver Lüdtke & Alexander Robitzsch, 2020. "Maximum likelihood estimation of a social relations structural equation model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(4), pages 870-889, December.
    7. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    8. Tim B. Swartz & Paramjit S. Gill & Saman Muthukumarana, 2015. "A Bayesian approach for the analysis of triadic data in cognitive social structures," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 593-610, August.
    9. Edgar C. Merkle, 2011. "A Comparison of Imputation Methods for Bayesian Factor Analysis Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 36(2), pages 257-276, April.
    10. Richard Scheines & Herbert Hoijtink & Anne Boomsma, 1999. "Bayesian estimation and testing of structural equation models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 64(1), pages 37-52, March.
    11. Peter D. Hoff, 2005. "Bilinear Mixed-Effects Models for Dyadic Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 100, pages 286-295, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sosa, Juan & Betancourt, Brenda, 2022. "A latent space model for multilayer network data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Steffen Nestler & Oliver Lüdtke & Alexander Robitzsch, 2020. "Maximum likelihood estimation of a social relations structural equation model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(4), pages 870-889, December.
    3. Steffen Nestler & Oliver Lüdtke & Alexander Robitzsch, 2022. "Analyzing Longitudinal Social Relations Model Data Using the Social Relations Structural Equation Model," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 47(2), pages 231-260, April.
    4. Steffen Nestler & Katharina Geukes & Roos Hutteman & Mitja D. Back, 2017. "Tackling Longitudinal Round-Robin Data: A Social Relations Growth Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(4), pages 1162-1181, December.
    5. Paul, Sudeshna & Keating, Nancy L. & Landon, Bruce E. & O'Malley, A. James, 2014. "Results from using a new dyadic-dependence model to analyze sociocentric physician networks," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 67-75.
    6. Murphy, James, 2020. "Explanatory Item Response Models for Dyadic Data from Multiple Groups," SocArXiv sx9um, Center for Open Science.
    7. Piotr Tarka, 2018. "An overview of structural equation modeling: its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 313-354, January.
    8. Elena A. Erosheva & S. McKay Curtis, 2017. "Dealing with Reflection Invariance in Bayesian Factor Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(2), pages 295-307, June.
    9. Paul, Sudeshna & Keating, Nancy L. & Landon, Bruce E. & O’Malley, A. James, 2015. "Reprint of: Results from using a new dyadic-dependence model to analyze sociocentric physician networks," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 51-59.
    10. Tracy Sweet & Samrachana Adhikari, 2020. "A Latent Space Network Model for Social Influence," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(2), pages 251-274, June.
    11. Frasquet, Marta & Ieva, Marco & Ziliani, Cristina, 2019. "Understanding complaint channel usage in multichannel retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 94-103.
    12. Falk, Carl F. & Muthukrishna, Michael, 2021. "Parsimony in model selection: tools for assessing fit propensity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110856, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Sonia Nawrocka & Hans De Witte & Margherita Pasini & Margherita Brondino, 2023. "A Person-Centered Approach to Job Insecurity: Is There a Reciprocal Relationship between the Quantitative and Qualitative Dimensions of Job Insecurity?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-27, March.
    14. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Mariateresa Ciommi & Chiara Gigliarano & Francesco M. Chelli & Mauro Gallegati, 2022. "It is the Total that Does [Not] Make the Sum: Nature, Economy and Society in the Equitable and Sustainable Well-Being of the Italian Provinces," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 491-522, June.
    16. Masashi Soga & Kevin J. Gaston & Yuichi Yamaura & Kiyo Kurisu & Keisuke Hanaki, 2016. "Both Direct and Vicarious Experiences of Nature Affect Children’s Willingness to Conserve Biodiversity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, May.
    17. César Merino-Soto & Gina Chávez-Ventura & Verónica López-Fernández & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-L): Psychometric and Measurement Invariance Evidence in Peruvian Undergraduate Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Fetene B. Tekle & Dereje W. Gudicha & Jeroen K. Vermunt, 2016. "Power analysis for the bootstrap likelihood ratio test for the number of classes in latent class models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 10(2), pages 209-224, June.
    19. Gómez Ramos, Almudena & Bardají Azcaráte, Isabel & Atance Muñiz, Ignacio, 2006. "The role of geographical labelling in inserting extensive cattle systems into beef marketing channels. Evidence from three Spanish case studies," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 78.
    20. Yifan Zhu & Chongzhi Di & Ying Qing Chen, 2019. "Clustering Functional Data with Application to Electronic Medication Adherence Monitoring in HIV Prevention Trials," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 11(2), pages 238-261, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:7:y:2024:i:1:p:15-268:d:1347994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.