IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v6y2023i3p55-906d1224842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical Modeling of Implicit Functional Relations

Author

Listed:
  • Stan Lipovetsky

    (Independent Researcher, Minneapolis, MN 55305, USA)

Abstract

This study considers the statistical estimation of relations presented by implicit functions. Such structures define mutual interconnections of variables rather than outcome variable dependence by predictor variables considered in regular regression analysis. For a simple case of two variables, pairwise regression modeling produces two different lines of each variable dependence using another variable, but building an implicit relation yields one invertible model composed of two simple regressions. Modeling an implicit linear relation for multiple variables can be expressed as a generalized eigenproblem of the covariance matrix of the variables in the metric of the covariance matrix of their errors. For unknown errors, this work describes their estimation by the residual errors of each variable in its regression by the other predictors. Then, the generalized eigenproblem can be reduced to the diagonalization of a special matrix built from the variables’ covariance matrix and its inversion. Numerical examples demonstrate the eigenvector solution’s good properties for building a unique equation of the relations between all variables. The proposed approach can be useful in practical regression modeling with all variables containing unobserved errors, which is a common situation for the applied problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Stan Lipovetsky, 2023. "Statistical Modeling of Implicit Functional Relations," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:6:y:2023:i:3:p:55-906:d:1224842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/6/3/55/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/6/3/55/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Draper, Norman R. & Yang, Yonghong (Fred), 1997. "Generalization of the geometric mean functional relationship," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 355-372, January.
    2. Ronald Christensen, 2022. "Comment on “On Optimal Correlation-Based Prediction,” by Bottai et al. (2022)," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(4), pages 322-322, October.
    3. Francq, Bernard G. & Govaerts, Bernadette, 2014. "Measurement methods comparison with errors-in-variables regressions. From horizontal to vertical OLS regression, review and new perspectives," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2014015, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colignatus, Thomas, 2017. "Comparing votes and seats with a diagonal (dis-) proportionality measure, using the slope-diagonal deviation (SDD) with cosine, sine and sign," MPRA Paper 80833, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 17 Aug 2017.
    2. Shaoji Xu, 2014. "A Property of Geometric Mean Regression," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(4), pages 277-281, November.
    3. Stan Lipovetsky, 2022. "Canonical Concordance Correlation Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Chris Tofallis, 2023. "Fitting an Equation to Data Impartially," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Colignatus, Thomas, 2017. "Comparing votes and seats with a diagonal (dis-) proportionality measure, using the slope-diagonal deviation (SDD) with cosine, sine and sign," MPRA Paper 80965, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Aug 2017.
    6. Mark H Holmes & Michael Caiola, 2018. "Invariance properties for the error function used for multilinear regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Correndo, Adrian A. & Hefley, Trevor J. & Holzworth, Dean P. & Ciampitti, Ignacio A., 2021. "Revisiting linear regression to test agreement in continuous predicted-observed datasets," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    8. James Laird-Smith & Kevin Meyer & Kanshukan Rajaratnam, 2016. "A study of total beta specification through symmetric regression: the case of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 114-125, June.
    9. Liang Yan & Rui Wang & Xingzhong Xu, 2017. "Fiducial inference in the classical errors-in-variables model," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 93-114, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:6:y:2023:i:3:p:55-906:d:1224842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.