IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v12y2022i1p25-d748079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policies to Reduce Child Poverty in Norway: Can Municipalities Ensure Positive Functionings for Children through Housing Policies?

Author

Listed:
  • Marit Kristine Helgesen

    (Department of Welfare, Management and Organisation, Faculty of Health, Welfare and Organisation, Østfold University College, 1757 Halden, Norway)

  • Petter Arvesen

    (Department of Welfare, Management and Organisation, Faculty of Health, Welfare and Organisation, Østfold University College, 1757 Halden, Norway)

Abstract

Child poverty is an increasing challenge for Norwegian society and its municipalities. Policies to reduce it include housing as one particularly important health determinant. The capability approach allows us to focus on determinants for health. Methods were triangulated and literature and document studies, interviews and participating observations were part of the data-gathering process. Thematic analyses were used to analyse data. Children and adults view housing as important. Housing determines families’ possibilities of consuming other goods and choosing what functionings they will convert their resources into. Municipalities can change the course of development by engaging with the Norwegian Government Housing Bank and implementing instruments such as social housing, housing allowances and starter loans giving families the possibility to become homeowners. Housing determines intra- as well as inter-generational life chances. Housing is a corrosive functioning if children live in families that have low-quality housing or high housing costs. Housing is a positive functioning for children if families own their housing. Housing is defined as a market good and a welfare asset. Policies enable some families to buy their own housing, whereas the number of poor children still increases.

Suggested Citation

  • Marit Kristine Helgesen & Petter Arvesen, 2022. "Policies to Reduce Child Poverty in Norway: Can Municipalities Ensure Positive Functionings for Children through Housing Policies?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:25-:d:748079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/1/25/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/12/1/25/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Redmond, Gerry & Skattebol, Jennifer, 2019. "Material deprivation and capability deprivation in the midst of affluence: The case of young people in Australia," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 36-48.
    2. Andresen, Sabine & Meiland, Stephanie, 2019. "Being poor from children's point of view. The potential of childhood theory and qualitative methods for child poverty research: Findings from two qualitative studies of poverty in Germany," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 94-99.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Charmaine J.M. & Goh, Esther C.L., 2020. "Using vignettes as a ‘safe space’ for low-income children to discuss sensitive topics in social work assessment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Laia Narciso & Silvia Carrasco & Gabriela Poblet, 2022. "Exploring Children’s Views and Experiences in the Frontline of Poverty in Catalonia: A Qualitative and Participatory Approach," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 16-28.
    3. Brenda Gladstone & Silvia Exenberger & Bente Weimand & Vincci Lui & Nina Haid-Stecher & Monika Geretsegger, 2021. "The Capability Approach in Research about Children and Childhood: a Scoping Review," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(1), pages 453-475, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:25-:d:748079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.