IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v7y2018i11p238-d183012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indonesian Traditional Market Flexibility Amidst State Promoted Market Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Mangku Purnomo

    (Department of Socio-Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Brawijaya University, Jln. Veteran, Malang 65145, Indonesia)

  • Fenna Otten

    (Department of Human Geography, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Heiko Faust

    (Department of Human Geography, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany)

Abstract

The penetration of modern supermarkets is believed to be the cause of the declining role of traditional markets and street vendors in Indonesia. Nevertheless, the competition between state-promoted markets and traditional markets is rarely discussed, both adaptation of market institution and strategy of market actors. This research outlined a theoretical understanding of the dynamics of traditional markets, along the concepts of market flexibility as an adaptation strategy and coordination problems as market actor strategies. The researchers empirically reflect the strategies of four traditional vegetable markets that still survive from tight competition—both the market itself as a social institution, and the strategies of actors involved in market transactions. The traditional market builds flexibility by: (1) Specifying commodities, (2) segmenting customers, (3) changing market operating hour, (4) modifying transportation to operate more efficiently, and (5) low cost market management. At the actor level, competition problems are resolved by utilizing an emotional sentiment of friendship social relations; the formation of prices is determined by developing effective networks of information; and the cooperation problem is dealt with by building a system of punishment and reward based on informal mechanisms. This finding verifies the thesis stating that market competitiveness is determined by institutional flexibility against competition and the ability of market actors to build effective social interactions to maintain market sustainability. Based on the above explanation, further research needs to be focused on calculating how much efficiency is built due to market flexibility, both the transaction cost and the production cost in a quantitative manner. At the actor level, it is necessary to delineate the strategies being built, whether based on pure rational or economic and moral or non-economic considerations in solving coordination problems in the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Mangku Purnomo & Fenna Otten & Heiko Faust, 2018. "Indonesian Traditional Market Flexibility Amidst State Promoted Market Competition," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:11:p:238-:d:183012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/11/238/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/11/238/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beckert, Jens, 2011. "Where do prices come from? Sociological approaches to price formation," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Williamson, Oliver E., 2010. "Transaction Cost Economics: The Natural Progression," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 215-226.
    3. Wouter Zant, 2018. "Trains, Trade, and Transaction Costs: How Does Domestic Trade by Rail Affect Market Prices of Malawi Agricultural Commodities?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 32(2), pages 334-356.
    4. Wardhana, Dadan & Ihle, Rico & Heijman, Wim, 2017. "The Effects of Agro-clusters on Rural Poverty: A Spatial Perspective for West Java," 2017 ASAE 9th International Conference, January 11-13, Bangkok, Thailand 284884, Asian Society of Agricultural Economists (ASAE).
    5. Joko Mariyono & Apri Kuntariningsih & Hanik A. Dewi & Evi Latifah, 2017. "Pathway analysis of vegetable farming commercialization," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 9(2), pages 115-124, April.
    6. William A. Jackson, 2003. "Social Structure in Economic Theory," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 727-746, September.
    7. Fabian Muniesa & Yuval Millo & Michel Callon, 2007. "An introduction to market devices," Post-Print halshs-00177928, HAL.
    8. Jackson, William A., 2015. "Markets and the Meaning of Flexibility," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 45-65.
    9. Athanasia Dimitriadou & Periklis Gogas & Theophilos Papadimitriou & Vasilios Plakandaras, 2018. "Oil Market Efficiency under a Machine Learning Perspective," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-12, October.
    10. Chowdhry, Bhagwan & Nanda, Vikram, 1998. "Leverage and Market Stability: The Role of Margin Rules and Price Limits," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 71(2), pages 179-210, April.
    11. Beckert, Jens, 2007. "The Great Transformation of Embeddedness: Karl Polanyi and the New Economic Sociology," MPIfG Discussion Paper 07/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    12. Beckert, Jens & Aspers, Patrik (ed.), 2011. "The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199594658.
    13. Hery Toiba & Wendy J. Umberger & Nicholas Minot, 2015. "Diet Transition and Supermarket Shopping Behaviour: Is There a Link?," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3), pages 389-403, December.
    14. Michael Pirson & Kirsten Martin & Bidhan Parmar, 2017. "Formation of Stakeholder Trust in Business and the Role of Personal Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Joko Mariyono & Apri Kuntariningsih & Hanik A. Dewi & Evi Latifah & Putu B. Daroini & Aria A. Negoro & Victor Afari-sefa & Greg Luther, 2017. "Pathway analysis of vegetable farming commercialization," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 9(2), pages 115-124.
    16. Carmen Pedroza-Gutiérrez & Juan M Hernández, 2017. "Social networks, market transactions, and reputation as a central resource. The Mercado del Mar, a fish market in central Mexico," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Dadan Wardhana & Rico Ihle & Wim Heijman, 2017. "Agro-clusters and Rural Poverty: A Spatial Perspective for West Java," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 161-186, May.
    18. Joseph Mawejje & Stein Terje Holden, 2014. "Does social network capital buy higher agricultural prices? A case of coffee in Masaka district, Uganda," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(7), pages 573-585, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Angga Dwiartama & Matthew Kelly & Jane Dixon, 2023. "Linking food security, food sovereignty and foodways in urban Southeast Asia: cases from Indonesia and Thailand," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(2), pages 505-517, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ragdad Cani Miranti, 2021. "Is regional poverty converging across Indonesian districts? A distribution dynamics and spatial econometric approach," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 851-883, October.
    2. Gerhard Rainer, 2021. "Geographies of qualification in the global fine wine market," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 95-112, February.
    3. Lis-Plesińska, Aleksandra, 2022. "Predictions of electricity prices as embedded devices for coordinating European futures," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 24(1), pages 11-17.
    4. Yinhao Wu & Enru Wang & Changhong Miao, 2019. "Fertilizer Use in China: The Role of Agricultural Support Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Reinke, Rouven, 2021. "Das Verhältnis von neuer Wirtschaftssoziologie und moderner Volkswirtschaftslehre: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer soziologischen Kritik am (neoklassischen) Mainstream," ZÖSS-Discussion Papers 83, University of Hamburg, Centre for Economic and Sociological Studies (CESS/ZÖSS).
    6. Nouguez, Etienne, 2014. "Governing the market through prices: The state and controls on the price of medicines in France," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 15(2), pages 41-48.
    7. Rakeshkumar Mahto & Deepak Sharma & Reshma John & Chandrasekhar Putcha, 2021. "Agrivoltaics: A Climate-Smart Agriculture Approach for Indian Farmers," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, November.
    8. Kornberger, Martin & Pflueger, Dane & Mouritsen, Jan, 2017. "Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 79-95.
    9. Renato Quiliche & Rafael Rentería-Ramos & Irineu de Brito Junior & Ana Luna & Mario Chong, 2021. "Using Spatial Patterns of COVID-19 to Build a Framework for Economic Reactivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Degenshein, Anya, 2017. "Degenshein_Strategies of Valuation," OSF Preprints 6ka29, Center for Open Science.
    11. Gregory C. Luther & Joko Mariyono & Raden M. Purnagunawan & Ben Satriatna & Martin Siyaranamual, 2018. "Impacts of farmer field schools on productivity of vegetable farming in Indonesia," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(2), pages 71-82, May.
    12. Wilkinson, John, 2019. "An overview of German new economic sociology and the contribution of the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies," MPIfG Discussion Paper 19/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    13. Kornberger Martin & Pflueger Dane & Mouritsen Jan, 2017. "Evaluative infrastructures : Accounting for platform organization," Post-Print hal-02276737, HAL.
    14. Chauvin, Pierre-Marie, 2013. "The social fabric of prices: Institutional factors and reputation work in the bordeaux wine futures campaign," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 15(1), pages 12-21.
    15. Verena Brinks, 2016. "Situated affect and collective meaning: A community perspective on processes of value creation and commercialization in enthusiast-driven fields," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(6), pages 1152-1169, June.
    16. Niculaescu, Corina E. & Sangiorgi, Ivan & Bell, Adrian R., 2023. "Does personal experience with COVID-19 impact investment decisions? Evidence from a survey of US retail investors," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    17. Carlos Omar Trejo-Pech & Roselia Servín-Juárez & Álvaro Reyes-Duarte, 2023. "What sets cooperative farmers apart from non-cooperative farmers? A transaction cost economics analysis of coffee farmers in Mexico," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Nolan Charles & Trew Alex, 2015. "Transaction Costs and Institutions: Investments in Exchange," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 391-432, July.
    19. David Bartolini, 2015. "Municipal fragmentation and economic performance in OECD TL2 regions," ERSA conference papers ersa15p607, European Regional Science Association.
    20. Rossi, Enrico, 2020. "Reconsidering the dual nature of property rights: personal property and capital in the law and economics of property rights," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105840, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:11:p:238-:d:183012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.