IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v7y2018i10p175-d172265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stratification with Honors: A Case Study of the “High” Track within United States Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Amy E. Stich

    (Institute of Higher Education, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)

Abstract

At present, U.S. postsecondary sorting is best evidenced by an increasingly stratified system of higher education. However, very little attention is paid to even deeper levels of stratification within colleges and universities where academic tracking and its consequences are manifest. Given this significant lack of attention to deepening levels of stratification within many of the most “accessible” postsecondary institutions in the U.S., the purpose of this article is threefold: (1) to introduce readers to the notion of academic tracking within the postsecondary sector, (2) to situate honors education within the U.S. postsecondary tracking structure, and (3) to demonstrate the depths of stratification within a system that is lauded as the contemporary architect of social mobility. Based upon qualitative data collected during the 2016–2017 academic year at one public 4-year “accessible” university, findings illustrate the persistence, structure, and depths of stratification as an unintended consequence of one university’s efforts to reconcile the competing goals of excellence and equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy E. Stich, 2018. "Stratification with Honors: A Case Study of the “High” Track within United States Higher Education," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:10:p:175-:d:172265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/10/175/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/10/175/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kimberly A. Goyette & Ann L. Mullen, 2006. "Who Studies the Arts and Sciences? Social Background and the Choice and Consequences of Undergraduate Field of Study," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(3), pages 497-538, May.
    2. Nicholas A. Bowman & KC Culver, 2018. "When Do Honors Programs Make the Grade? Conditional Effects on College Satisfaction, Achievement, Retention, and Graduation," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(3), pages 249-272, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mary L. Scherer, 2022. "Strategically Unequal: How Class, Culture, and Institutional Context Shape Academic Strategies," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Élisabeth Tovar & Matthieu Bunel, 2021. "Attitudes on past-in-present educational discrimination. Insights from a representative factorial survey," EconomiX Working Papers 2021-28, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharron Xuanren Wang & Arthur Sakamoto, 2021. "Can Higher Education Ameliorate Racial/Ethnic Disadvantage? An Analysis of the Wage Assimilation of College-Educated Hispanic Americans," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    2. Anna Manzoni & Jessi Streib, 2019. "The Equalizing Power of a College Degree for First-Generation College Students: Disparities Across Institutions, Majors, and Achievement Levels," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 60(5), pages 577-605, August.
    3. Jeongeun Kim & Molly Ott & Lindsey Dippold, 2020. "University and Department Influences on Scientists’ Occupational Outcomes," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(2), pages 197-228, March.
    4. Yang, Lijun, 2018. "Higher education expansion and post-college unemployment: Understanding the roles of fields of study in China," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 62-74.
    5. Jing Tian & Mohan Zhang & Haitao Zhou & Jianfen Wu, 2021. "College Satisfaction, Sense of Achievement, Student Happiness and Sense of Belonging of Freshmen in Chinese Private Colleges: Mediation Effect of Emotion Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Kieron J. Barclay & Martin Hällsten & Mikko Myrskylä, 2016. "Birth order and college major in Sweden," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2016-008, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    7. Iryna Y. Johnson & William B. Muse, 2017. "Choice of Academic Major at a Public Research University: The Role of Gender and Self-Efficacy," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(4), pages 365-394, June.
    8. Tuomo Suhonen, 2012. "The role of distances and parents’ educational background in university field of study choice," ERSA conference papers ersa12p751, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Congbin Guo & Mengchao Guo & Xiaowei Hao, 2021. "Do Students Prioritize Majors or Specific Colleges? Analyzing the Factors That Influence Preferences in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    10. Ansong, David & Wu, Shiyou & Chowa, Gina A.N., 2015. "The role of child and parent savings in promoting expectations for university education among middle school students in Ghana: A propensity score analysis," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 265-273.
    11. J Farley O Staniec, 2017. "Missing Men: Determinants of the Gender Gap in Education Majors," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 43(4), pages 699-714, September.
    12. Kevin M. Kniffin & Andrew S. Hanks, 2017. "Antecedents and near-term consequences for interdisciplinary dissertators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1225-1250, June.
    13. Brian P. An & Chad N. Loes, 2023. "Participation in High-Impact Practices: Considering the Role of Institutional Context and a Person-Centered Approach," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 64(4), pages 520-546, June.
    14. K. C. Culver & Nicholas A. Bowman, 2020. "Is What Glitters Really Gold? A Quasi-Experimental Study of First-Year Seminars and College Student Success," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(2), pages 167-196, March.
    15. Siqi Han & Dmitry Tumin & Zhenchao Qian, 2016. "Gendered transitions to adulthood by college field of study in the United States," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 35(31), pages 929-960.
    16. Loris Vergolini & Eleonora Vlach, 2015. "Family background and educational path of Italian graduates," FBK-IRVAPP Working Papers 2015-08, Research Institute for the Evaluation of Public Policies (IRVAPP), Bruno Kessler Foundation.
    17. Ibsen, Kristoffer & Rosholm, Michael, 2024. "What Works? Interventions Aimed At Reducing Student Dropout in Higher Education," IZA Discussion Papers 16853, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Valentina Meliciani & Debora Radicchia, 2016. "Overeducation and overskill in the Italian labour market: the role of fields of study," Working Papers 33, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Jul 2016.
    19. Micha G. Keijer, 2021. "Effects of social economic status and parenting values on adolescents’ expected field of study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:10:p:175-:d:172265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.