IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v11y2022i11p493-d951512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Lock-in Effect of Marriage: Work Incentives after Saying “I Do”

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Christl

    (Fiscal Policy Analysis Unit, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Edificio Expo, C. Inca Garcilaso, 3, 41092 Seville, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Silvia De Poli

    (Fiscal Policy Analysis Unit, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Edificio Expo, C. Inca Garcilaso, 3, 41092 Seville, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Viginta Ivaškaitė-Tamošiūnė

    (Fiscal Policy Analysis Unit, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Edificio Expo, C. Inca Garcilaso, 3, 41092 Seville, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

In this paper, we use EUROMOD, the tax-benefit microsimulation model of the European Union, to investigate the impact of marriage-related tax-benefit instruments on the financial incentives to work of married couples. For each spouse, we estimate their individual marginal effective tax rate and net replacement rate before and after marriage. We show that the marriage bonus, which is economically significant in eight European countries, decreases the work incentives for women, particularly on the intensive margin. In contrast, for men the incentives on the intensive margin increase once they are married, pointing to the marriage-biased and gender-biased tax-benefit structures in the analysed countries. Our results suggest that marriage bonuses contribute to a lock-in effect, where second earners, typically women, are incentivised to work less, with negative economic consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Christl & Silvia De Poli & Viginta Ivaškaitė-Tamošiūnė, 2022. "The Lock-in Effect of Marriage: Work Incentives after Saying “I Do”," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:493-:d:951512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/11/493/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/11/493/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lixin Cai & Guyonne Kalb & Yi-Ping Tseng & Ha Vu, 2008. "The Effect of Financial Incentives on Labour Supply: Evidence for Lone Parents from Microsimulation and Quasi-Experimental Evaluation," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 29(2), pages 285-325, June.
    2. Thomas F. Crossley & Sung-Hee Jeon, 2007. "Joint Taxation and the Labour Supply of Married Women: Evidence from the Canadian Tax Reform of 1988," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 28(3), pages 343-365, September.
    3. Maria Delgado Coelho & Aieshwarya Davis & Mr. Alexander D Klemm & Ms. Carolina Osorio-Buitron, 2022. "Gendered Taxes: The Interaction of Tax Policy with Gender Equality," IMF Working Papers 2022/026, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Doorley, Karina, 2018. "Taxation, Work and Gender Equality in Ireland," IZA Discussion Papers 11495, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Christl & Silvia De Poli & Viginta Ivaskaite-Tamosiune, 2022. "The lock-in effect of marriage: Work incentives after saying “Yes, I do.”," JRC Working Papers on Taxation & Structural Reforms 2022-07, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Michael Christl & Silvia De Poli & Viginta Ivaskaite-Tamosiune, 2022. "The lock-in effect of marriage: Work incentives after saying, “Yes, I do.â€," Working Papers 615, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    3. Alan, Sule & Atalay, Kadir & Crossley, Thomas F. & Jeon, Sung-Hee, 2010. "New evidence on taxes and portfolio choice," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(11-12), pages 813-823, December.
    4. Elisabeth Gugl, 2009. "Income splitting, specialization, and intra‐family distribution," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(3), pages 1050-1071, August.
    5. Russell, Helen & McGinnity, Frances & Fahey, Éamonn & Kenny, Oona, 2018. "Maternal employment and the cost of childcare in Ireland," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS73, August.
    6. Nicolas Frémeaux & Arnaud Lefranc, 2020. "Assortative Mating and Earnings Inequality in France," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 66(4), pages 757-783, December.
    7. Regan, Mark & Kakoulidou, Theano, 2022. "How important are the unit of analysis and equivalence scales when measuring income poverty and inequality? Evidence from Ireland," Papers WP721, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    8. Susan Averett & Laura Argys & Julia Sorkin, 2013. "In sickness and in health: an examination of relationship status and health using data from the Canadian National Public Health Survey," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 599-633, December.
    9. Ayala, Luis & Paniagua, Milagros, 2017. "The impact of in-work benefits on female labor supply and income distribution in Spain," EUROMOD Working Papers EM17/17, EUROMOD at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    10. John Creedy & Nicolas Hérault, 2009. "Optimal Marginal Income Tax Reforms: A Microsimulation Analysis," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2009n23, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    11. Guyonne Kalb & Thor Thoresen, 2010. "A comparison of family policy designs of Australia and Norway using microsimulation models," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 255-287, June.
    12. Guyonne Kalb, 2010. "Modelling Labour Supply Responses in Australia and New Zealand," Chapters, in: Iris Claus & Norman Gemmell & Michelle Harding & David White (ed.), Tax Reform in Open Economies, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Tammy Schirle, 2015. "The effect of universal child benefits on labour supply," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 437-463, May.
    14. Selin, Håkan, 2009. "The Rise in Female Employment and the Role of Tax Incentives. An Empirical Analysis of the Swedish Individual Tax Reform of 1971," Working Paper Series 2009:4, Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
    15. Olivier Bargain & Karina Doorley, 2016. "The Effect of Social Benefits on Youth Employment: Combining RD and a Behavioral Model," Post-Print hal-03894917, HAL.
    16. Martinez, Isabel Z., 2016. "Beggar-Thy-Neighbour Tax Cuts: Mobility after a Local Income and Wealth Tax Reform in Switzerland," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145643, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    17. Reljic, Jelena & Zezza, Francesco, 2024. "Breaking the Divide: Can Public Spending on Social Infrastructure Boost Female Employment in Italy?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1407, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    18. Amadeo Fuenmayor & Rafael Granell & Mauro Mediavilla, 2018. "The effects of separate taxation on labor participation of married couples. An empirical analysis using propensity score," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 541-561, June.
    19. Boyer, Pierre & Bierbrauer, Felix & Peichl, Andreas & Weishaar, Daniel, 2023. "The taxation of couples," CEPR Discussion Papers 18138, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Nicola Fuchs-Schündeln & Alexander Bick, 2014. "Taxation and Labor Supply of Married Women across Countries: A Macroeconomic Analysis," 2014 Meeting Papers 321, Society for Economic Dynamics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:493-:d:951512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.