IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v12y2023i1p2-d1307075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Board Response to Transnational Regulation on Corporate Governance: A Case Study on EU Banking Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Seppo Ikäheimo

    (Department of Accounting, Aalto University School of Business, FI-00076 Helsinki, Finland)

  • Eduardo Schiehll

    (Department of Accounting, HEC Montréal, Montreal, QC H3S 2A7, Canada)

  • Vikash Kumar Sinha

    (Department of Accounting, Aalto University School of Business, FI-00076 Helsinki, Finland)

Abstract

How does a board of directors respond to stringent transnational regulations on corporate governance? We explore this question in a case study that includes interviews with key governance actors of a bank dealing with regulatory changes in the European Union (EU) initiated in 2010 in response to the financial crisis of 2007–2008. Our findings suggest that transnational regulations introduced a conflicting prescription to the directors, who were caught between two needs: existing local governance practices and transnational regulatory compliance. Contributing to the international corporate governance research, our findings corroborate the resistance to transnational regulations and the distrust attributable to boards of directors’ role struggles and the invasive accountability mechanisms introduced by such regulations. We, therefore, contribute to the ongoing discussion on how the conflicting layers of corporate governance—local versus global—and how the discontinuities between competing existing practices and the prescriptions of transnational regulations can provoke micro-resistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Seppo Ikäheimo & Eduardo Schiehll & Vikash Kumar Sinha, 2023. "Board Response to Transnational Regulation on Corporate Governance: A Case Study on EU Banking Regulation," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:2-:d:1307075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/1/2/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/12/1/2/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglas Cumming & Igor Filatotchev & April Knill & David Mitchell Reeb & Lemma Senbet, 2017. "Law, finance, and the international mobility of corporate governance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(2), pages 123-147, February.
    2. Ruth V. Aguilera & Birgitte Grøgaard, 2019. "The dubious role of institutions in international business: A road forward," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(1), pages 20-35, February.
    3. Ilir Haxhi & Ruth V. Aguilera, 2017. "An Institutional Configurational Approach to Cross-National Diversity in Corporate Governance," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 261-303, May.
    4. Ruth V. Aguilera & Igor Filatotchev & Howard Gospel & Gregory Jackson, 2008. "An Organizational Approach to Comparative Corporate Governance: Costs, Contingencies, and Complementarities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 475-492, June.
    5. Luca Enriques & Paolo Volpin, 2007. "Corporate Governance Reforms in Continental Europe," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(1), pages 117-140, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruth V. Aguilera & Valentina Marano & Ilir Haxhi, 2019. "International corporate governance: A review and opportunities for future research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(4), pages 457-498, June.
    2. Alessandro Zattoni & Emmanouil Dedoulis & Stergios Leventis & Hans Van Ees, 2020. "Corporate governance and institutions—A review and research agenda," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 465-487, November.
    3. Luis Alfonso Dau & Aya S. Chacar & Marjorie A. Lyles & Jiatao Li, 2022. "Informal institutions and international business: Toward an integrative research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 985-1010, August.
    4. Krista B. Lewellyn & Maureen I. Muller-Kahle, 2020. "The Corporate Board Glass Ceiling: The Role of Empowerment and Culture in Shaping Board Gender Diversity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 329-346, August.
    5. Jordi A. Surroca & Ruth V. Aguilera & Kurt Desender & Josep A. Tribó, 2020. "Is managerial entrenchment always bad and corporate social responsibility always good? A cross‐national examination of their combined influence on shareholder value," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 891-920, May.
    6. Steve Sauerwald & J. (Hans) Van Oosterhout & Marc Van Essen, 2016. "Expressive Shareholder Democracy: A Multilevel Study of Shareholder Dissent in 15 Western European Countries," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 520-551, June.
    7. Michele Pizzo, 2013. "Related party transactions under a contingency perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(2), pages 309-330, May.
    8. Shui, Xiaolong & Zhang, Minhao & Smart, Palie & Ye, Fei, 2022. "Sustainable corporate governance for environmental innovation: A configurational analysis on board capital, CEO power and ownership structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 786-794.
    9. Henrique Castro Martins & Eduardo Schiehll & Paulo Renato Soares Terra, 2020. "Do shareholder protection and creditor rights have distinct effects on the association between debt maturity and ownership structure?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5-6), pages 708-729, May.
    10. Khlif, Wafa & Clarke, Thomas & Karoui, Lotfi & Seny Kan, Konan A. & Ingley, Coral, 2019. "Governing complexity to challenge neoliberalism? Embedded firms and the prospects of understanding new realities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 601-610.
    11. Johann Fortwengel, 2017. "Understanding When MNCs can Overcome Institutional Distance: A Research Agenda," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 793-814, December.
    12. Yiwei Fang & Iftekhar Hasan & Woon Sau Leung & Qingwei Wang, 2019. "Foreign ownership, bank information environments, and the international mobility of corporate governance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(9), pages 1566-1593, December.
    13. Ben Clift, 2009. "The Second Time as Farce? The EU Takeover Directive, the Clash of Capitalisms and the Hamstrung Harmonization of European (and French) Corporate Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47, pages 55-79, January.
    14. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.
    15. Longwei Tian & Caleb H. Tse & Xunyong Xiang & Yuan Li & Yigang Pan, 2021. "Social movements and international business activities of firms," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(6), pages 1200-1214, August.
    16. Da Teng & Douglas B. Fuller & Chengchun Li, 2018. "Institutional change and corporate governance diversity in China’s SOEs," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 273-293, May.
    17. Birgitte Grøgaard & Asmund Rygh & Gabriel R. G. Benito, 2019. "Bringing corporate governance into internalization theory: State ownership and foreign entry strategies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(8), pages 1310-1337, October.
    18. Ionela Munteanu & Adriana Grigorescu & Elena Condrea & Elena Pelinescu, 2020. "Convergent Insights for Sustainable Development and Ethical Cohesion: An Empirical Study on Corporate Governance in Romanian Public Entities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Ruth V. Aguilera & Kurt A. Desender & Mónica López-Puertas Lamy & Jun Ho Lee, 2017. "The governance impact of a changing investor landscape," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(2), pages 195-221, February.
    20. Melsa Ararat & George Dallas, 2011. "Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets : Why It Matters to Investors—and What They Can Do About It," World Bank Publications - Reports 11071, The World Bank Group.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:2-:d:1307075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.