IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v10y2022i4p71-d778628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approaching European Supervisory Risk Assessment with SupTech: A Proposal of an Early Warning System

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Guerra

    (Nova Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus de Campolide, 1070-312 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Mauro Castelli

    (Nova Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus de Campolide, 1070-312 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Nadine Côrte-Real

    (Nova Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Campus de Campolide, 1070-312 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

Risk analysis and scenario testing are two of the core activities carried out by economists at central banks. With the increasing adoption of machine learning to enhance decision-support systems, and the amount of collected data spiking, institutions provide countless use-cases for the application of these innovative technologies. Consequently, in recent years, the term sup-tech has entered the financial jargon and is here to stay. In this paper, we address risk assessment from a central bank’s perspective. The uptrending number of involved banks and institutions raises the necessity of a standardised risk methodology. For that reason, we adopted the Risk Assessment Methodology (RAS), the quantitative pillar from the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). Based on real-world supervisory data from the Portuguese banking sector, from March 2014 until August 2021, we successfully model the supervisory risk assessment process, in its quantitative approach by the RAS. Our findings and the resulting model are proposed as an Early Warning System that can support supervisors in their day-to-day tasks, as well as within the SREP process.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Guerra & Mauro Castelli & Nadine Côrte-Real, 2022. "Approaching European Supervisory Risk Assessment with SupTech: A Proposal of an Early Warning System," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:71-:d:778628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/4/71/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/10/4/71/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kolari, James W. & López-Iturriaga, Félix J. & Sanz, Ivan Pastor, 2019. "Predicting European bank stress tests: Survival of the fittest," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 44-57.
    2. Casabianca, Elizabeth Jane & Catalano, Michele & Forni, Lorenzo & Giarda, Elena & Passeri, Simone, 2022. "A machine learning approach to rank the determinants of banking crises over time and across countries," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Filippopoulou, Chryssanthi & Galariotis, Emilios & Spyrou, Spyros, 2020. "An early warning system for predicting systemic banking crises in the Eurozone: A logit regression approach," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 344-363.
    4. Guerra, Pedro & Castelli, Mauro & Côrte-Real, Nadine, 2022. "Machine learning for liquidity risk modelling: A supervisory perspective," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 175-187.
    5. José Américo Pereira Antunes, 2021. "To supervise or to self-supervise: a machine learning based comparison on credit supervision," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Martin Leo & Suneel Sharma & K. Maddulety, 2019. "Machine Learning in Banking Risk Management: A Literature Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Pedro Guerra & Mauro Castelli, 2021. "Machine Learning Applied to Banking Supervision a Literature Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Lee, In & Shin, Yong Jae, 2020. "Machine learning for enterprises: Applications, algorithm selection, and challenges," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 157-170.
    9. Andrés Alonso & José Manuel Carbó, 2020. "Machine learning in credit risk: measuring the dilemma between prediction and supervisory cost," Working Papers 2032, Banco de España.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedro Guerra & Mauro Castelli, 2021. "Machine Learning Applied to Banking Supervision a Literature Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Guerra, Pedro & Castelli, Mauro & Côrte-Real, Nadine, 2022. "Machine learning for liquidity risk modelling: A supervisory perspective," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 175-187.
    3. Pejman Peykani & Mostafa Sargolzaei & Mohammad Hashem Botshekan & Camelia Oprean-Stan & Amir Takaloo, 2023. "Optimization of Asset and Liability Management of Banks with Minimum Possible Changes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Anil Kumar & Suneel Sharma & Mehregan Mahdavi, 2021. "Machine Learning (ML) Technologies for Digital Credit Scoring in Rural Finance: A Literature Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Wosnitza, Jan Henrik, 2022. "Calibration alternatives to logistic regression and their potential for transferring the dispersion of discriminatory power into uncertainties of probabilities of default," Discussion Papers 04/2022, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    6. John R. J. Thompson & Longlong Feng & R. Mark Reesor & Chuck Grace, 2021. "Know Your Clients’ Behaviours: A Cluster Analysis of Financial Transactions," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-29, January.
    7. Bavaresco, Rodrigo Simon & Nesi, Luan Carlos & Victória Barbosa, Jorge Luis & Antunes, Rodolfo Stoffel & da Rosa Righi, Rodrigo & da Costa, Cristiano André & Vanzin, Mariangela & Dornelles, Daniel & J, 2023. "Machine learning-based automation of accounting services: An exploratory case study," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    8. Doumpos, Michalis & Zopounidis, Constantin & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Platanakis, Emmanouil & Zhang, Wenke, 2023. "Operational research and artificial intelligence methods in banking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 1-16.
    9. Watson, Graeme J. & Desouza, Kevin C. & Ribiere, Vincent M. & Lindič, Jaka, 2021. "Will AI ever sit at the C-suite table? The future of senior leadership," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 465-474.
    10. Yudistira Permana & Saiqa Akbar & Anisa Nurpita, 2022. "Systemic risk and the financial network system: an experimental investigation," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(4), pages 631-651, December.
    11. Ionut Anica-Popa & Liana Anica-Popa & Cristina Radulescu & Marinela Vrincianu, 2021. "The Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Retail: Benefits, Challenges and a Dedicated Conceptual Framework," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(56), pages 120-120, February.
    12. Neubert, Mitchell J. & Montañez, George D., 2020. "Virtue as a framework for the design and use of artificial intelligence," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 195-204.
    13. Zixue Zhao & Tianxiang Cui & Shusheng Ding & Jiawei Li & Anthony Graham Bellotti, 2024. "Resampling Techniques Study on Class Imbalance Problem in Credit Risk Prediction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, February.
    14. Alina Köchling & Marius Claus Wehner, 2020. "Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 795-848, November.
    15. Keerthana Sivamayil & Elakkiya Rajasekar & Belqasem Aljafari & Srete Nikolovski & Subramaniyaswamy Vairavasundaram & Indragandhi Vairavasundaram, 2023. "A Systematic Study on Reinforcement Learning Based Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Kamoonpuri, Sana Zehra & Sengar, Anita, 2023. "Hi, May AI help you? An analysis of the barriers impeding the implementation and use of artificial intelligence-enabled virtual assistants in retail," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    17. Ming‐Lang Tseng & Hien Minh Ha & Thi Phuong Thuy Tran & Tat‐Dat Bui & Chih‐Cheng Chen & Chun‐Wei Lin, 2022. "Building a data‐driven circular supply chain hierarchical structure: Resource recovery implementation drives circular business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2082-2106, July.
    18. Yakubu, Hanan & Kwong, C.K., 2021. "Forecasting the importance of product attributes using online customer reviews and Google Trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    19. Bauer, Kevin & Nofer, Michael & Abdel-Karim, Benjamin M. & Hinz, Oliver, 2022. "The effects of discontinuing machine learning decision support," SAFE Working Paper Series 370, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    20. Dmytro Kovalenko & Olga Afanasieva & Nani Zabuta & Tetiana Boiko & Rosen Rosenov Baltov, 2021. "Model of Assessing the Overdue Debts in a Commercial Bank Using Neuro-Fuzzy Technologies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:10:y:2022:i:4:p:71-:d:778628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.