IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v8y2019i1p32-d203097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Spatial Dimension of the Circular Economy

Author

Listed:
  • T. E. Graedel

    (Center for Industrial Ecology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA)

  • Barbara K. Reck

    (Center for Industrial Ecology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA)

  • Luca Ciacci

    (Center for Industrial Ecology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
    Department of Industrial Chemistry “Toso Montanari”, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna 40136, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Passarini

    (Department of Industrial Chemistry “Toso Montanari”, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna 40136, Italy)

Abstract

The concept of a “circular economy”, in which material in society is regarded as “a transient phase in anthropogenic resource utilization”, is a growing topic for discussion. The primary motivations for supporting a circular economy include a reduction of environmental impacts and conservation of natural resources. Australia is a vivid example of a country whose large metal extraction capacity is not balanced as it has neither an extensive product manufacturing capability nor a large domestic market. Consequently, Australia must rely on the global resource network to achieve circularity and carbon neutrality. This work illustrates this situation with quantitative material flow cycles for Australian aluminum, nickel, copper, zinc, and stainless steel, and comments on the implications of the results for Australia and for circular economy prospects more generally.

Suggested Citation

  • T. E. Graedel & Barbara K. Reck & Luca Ciacci & Fabrizio Passarini, 2019. "On the Spatial Dimension of the Circular Economy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:32-:d:203097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/8/1/32/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/8/1/32/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hannes Hofmann & Martin C. Schleper & Constantin Blome, 2018. "Conflict Minerals and Supply Chain Due Diligence: An Exploratory Study of Multi-tier Supply Chains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 115-141, January.
    2. Diener, Derek L. & Tillman, Anne-Marie, 2015. "Component end-of-life management: Exploring opportunities and related benefits of remanufacturing and functional recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 80-93.
    3. Luca Ciacci & Philip Nuss & Barbara K. Reck & T. T. Werner & T. E. Graedel, 2016. "Metal Criticality Determination for Australia, the US, and the Planet—Comparing 2008 and 2012 Results," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-8, September.
    4. Ruth Lane, 2014. "Understanding the Dynamic Character of Value in Recycling Metals from Australia," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Tohru Morioka & Kiyotaka Tsunemi & Yugo Yamamoto & Helmut Yabar & Noboru Yoshida, 2005. "Eco‐efficiency of Advanced Loop‐closing Systems for Vehicles and Household Appliances in Hyogo Eco‐town," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 9(4), pages 205-221, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara Alonso-Muñoz & Rocío González-Sánchez & Cristina Siligardi & Fernando Enrique García-Muiña, 2021. "Building Exploitation Routines in the Circular Supply Chain to Obtain Radical Innovations," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Gergely Tóth, 2019. "Circular Economy and its Comparison with 14 Other Business Sustainability Movements," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jamalnia, Aboozar & Gong, Yu & Govindan, Kannan, 2023. "Sub-supplier's sustainability management in multi-tier supply chains: A systematic literature review on the contingency variables, and a conceptual framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    2. M. Tina Dacin & Jeffrey S. Harrison & David Hess & Sheila Killian & Julia Roloff, 2022. "Business Versus Ethics? Thoughts on the Future of Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(3), pages 863-877, October.
    3. Reinol Josef Compañero & Andreas Feldmann & Peter Samuelsson & Anders Tilliander & Pär Göran Jönsson & Rutger Gyllenram, 2023. "Appraising the value of compositional information and its implications to scrap-based production of steel," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 36(3), pages 463-480, September.
    4. Lèbre, Éléonore & Owen, John R. & Kemp, Deanna & Valenta, Rick K., 2022. "Complex orebodies and future global metal supply: An introduction," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    5. Marie K. Schellens & Johanna Gisladottir, 2018. "Critical Natural Resources: Challenging the Current Discourse and Proposal for a Holistic Definition," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-28, December.
    6. Berzi, Lorenzo & Delogu, Massimo & Pierini, Marco & Romoli, Filippo, 2016. "Evaluation of the end-of-life performance of a hybrid scooter with the application of recyclability and recoverability assessment methods," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 140-155.
    7. Gong, Mengfeng & Gao, Yuan & Koh, Lenny & Sutcliffe, Charles & Cullen, John, 2019. "The role of customer awareness in promoting firm sustainability and sustainable supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 88-96.
    8. Haitham Nobanee & Maryam Alhajjar & Ghada Abushairah & Safaa Al Harbi, 2021. "Reputational Risk and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis of Relevant Literature," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Philipp Sauer & Stefan Seuring, 2018. "A three-dimensional framework for multi-tier sustainable supply chain management," Post-Print hal-03926114, HAL.
    10. Luca Ciacci & Ivano Vassura & Fabrizio Passarini, 2017. "Urban Mines of Copper: Size and Potential for Recycling in the EU," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Fan, Jiongming & Hu, Shanying & Chen, Dingjiang & Zhou, Yucheng, 2017. "Study on the construction and optimization of a resource-based industrial ecosystem," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 97-108.
    12. Florian Habermann & Felix Bernhard Fischer, 2023. "Corporate Social Performance and the Likelihood of Bankruptcy: Evidence from a Period of Economic Upswing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 243-259, January.
    13. Maryam Lotfi & Helen Walker & Juan Rendon-Sanchez, 2021. "Supply Chains’ Failure in Workers’ Rights with Regards to the SDG Compass: A Doughnut Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    14. Hao, Han & Qiao, Qinyu & Liu, Zongwei & Zhao, Fuquan, 2017. "Impact of recycling on energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from electric vehicle production: The China 2025 case," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 114-125.
    15. Anicia Jaegler & Tobias Goessling, 2020. "Sustainability concerns in luxury supply chains: European brand strategies and French consumer expectations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2715-2733, September.
    16. Nikolas K. Kelling & Philipp C. Sauer & Stefan Gold & Stefan Seuring, 2021. "The Role of Institutional Uncertainty for Social Sustainability of Companies and Supply Chains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(4), pages 813-833, November.
    17. Boughton, Bob, 2007. "Evaluation of shredder residue as cement manufacturing feedstock," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 621-642.
    18. Stefania Camoletto & Laura Corazza & Simone Pizzi & Erica Santini, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility due diligence among European companies: The results of an interventionist research project with accountability and political implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1122-1133, September.
    19. Beltagui, Ahmad & Kunz, Nathan & Gold, Stefan, 2020. "The role of 3D printing and open design on adoption of socially sustainable supply chain innovation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    20. Yousefi, Samuel & Mohamadpour Tosarkani, Babak, 2022. "An analytical approach for evaluating the impact of blockchain technology on sustainable supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:32-:d:203097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.