IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i16p2954-d889390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ADMM-Based Differential Privacy Learning for Penalized Quantile Regression on Distributed Functional Data

Author

Listed:
  • Xingcai Zhou

    (School of Statistics and Data Science, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211085, China)

  • Yu Xiang

    (School of Statistics and Data Science, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211085, China)

Abstract

Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) is a widely used machine learning tool in distributed environments. In the paper, we propose an ADMM-based differential privacy learning algorithm (FDP-ADMM) on penalized quantile regression for distributed functional data. The FDP-ADMM algorithm can resist adversary attacks to avoid the possible privacy leakage in distributed networks, which is designed by functional principal analysis, an approximate augmented Lagrange function, ADMM algorithm, and privacy policy via Gaussian mechanism with time-varying variance. It is also a noise-resilient, convergent, and computationally effective distributed learning algorithm, even if for high privacy protection. The theoretical analysis on privacy and convergence guarantees is derived and offers a privacy–utility trade-off: a weaker privacy guarantee would result in better utility. The evaluations on simulation-distributed functional datasets have demonstrated the effectiveness of the FDP-ADMM algorithm even if under high privacy guarantee.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingcai Zhou & Yu Xiang, 2022. "ADMM-Based Differential Privacy Learning for Penalized Quantile Regression on Distributed Functional Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-28, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:16:p:2954-:d:889390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/16/2954/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/16/2954/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liqun Yu & Nan Lin, 2017. "ADMM for Penalized Quantile Regression in Big Data," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 85(3), pages 494-518, December.
    2. Robert Tibshirani, 2011. "Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: a retrospective," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 73(3), pages 273-282, June.
    3. Sun, Jie & Zhang, Su, 2010. "A modified alternating direction method for convex quadratically constrained quadratic semidefinite programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1210-1220, December.
    4. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    5. Tim Auton, 2004. "Applied Functional Data Analysis: Methods and Case Studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 167(2), pages 378-379, May.
    6. Ying Lu & Jiang Du & Zhimeng Sun, 2014. "Functional partially linear quantile regression model," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 77(2), pages 317-332, February.
    7. Michael I. Jordan & Jason D. Lee & Yun Yang, 2019. "Communication-Efficient Distributed Statistical Inference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(526), pages 668-681, April.
    8. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Addendum: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 768-768, November.
    9. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 301-320, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camila Epprecht & Dominique Guegan & Álvaro Veiga & Joel Correa da Rosa, 2017. "Variable selection and forecasting via automated methods for linear models: LASSO/adaLASSO and Autometrics," Post-Print halshs-00917797, HAL.
    2. Peter Martey Addo & Dominique Guegan & Bertrand Hassani, 2018. "Credit Risk Analysis Using Machine and Deep Learning Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Xing, Li-Min & Zhang, Yue-Jun, 2022. "Forecasting crude oil prices with shrinkage methods: Can nonconvex penalty and Huber loss help?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Yanfang Zhang & Chuanhua Wei & Xiaolin Liu, 2022. "Group Logistic Regression Models with l p,q Regularization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Xiaofei Wu & Rongmei Liang & Hu Yang, 2022. "Penalized and constrained LAD estimation in fixed and high dimension," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 53-95, February.
    6. Tanin Sirimongkolkasem & Reza Drikvandi, 2019. "On Regularisation Methods for Analysis of High Dimensional Data," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 737-763, December.
    7. van Erp, Sara & Oberski, Daniel L. & Mulder, Joris, 2018. "Shrinkage priors for Bayesian penalized regression," OSF Preprints cg8fq, Center for Open Science.
    8. Julien Chevallier & Dominique Guégan & Stéphane Goutte, 2021. "Is It Possible to Forecast the Price of Bitcoin?," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-44, May.
    9. JinXing Che & YouLong Yang, 2017. "Stochastic correlation coefficient ensembles for variable selection," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(10), pages 1721-1742, July.
    10. Julien Chevallier & Dominique Guégan & Stéphane Goutte, 2021. "Is It Possible to Forecast the Price of Bitcoin?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-04250269, HAL.
    11. Sierra A. Bainter & Thomas G. McCauley & Mahmoud M. Fahmy & Zachary T. Goodman & Lauren B. Kupis & J. Sunil Rao, 2023. "Comparing Bayesian Variable Selection to Lasso Approaches for Applications in Psychology," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 1032-1055, September.
    12. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    13. Margherita Giuzio, 2017. "Genetic algorithm versus classical methods in sparse index tracking," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 40(1), pages 243-256, November.
    14. Lucian Belascu & Alexandra Horobet & Georgiana Vrinceanu & Consuela Popescu, 2021. "Performance Dissimilarities in European Union Manufacturing: The Effect of Ownership and Technological Intensity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Shuichi Kawano, 2014. "Selection of tuning parameters in bridge regression models via Bayesian information criterion," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1207-1223, November.
    16. Yize Zhao & Matthias Chung & Brent A. Johnson & Carlos S. Moreno & Qi Long, 2016. "Hierarchical Feature Selection Incorporating Known and Novel Biological Information: Identifying Genomic Features Related to Prostate Cancer Recurrence," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1427-1439, October.
    17. Qianyun Li & Runmin Shi & Faming Liang, 2019. "Drug sensitivity prediction with high-dimensional mixture regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Changrong Yan & Dixin Zhang, 2013. "Sparse dimension reduction for survival data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 1835-1852, August.
    19. Gareth M. James & Peter Radchenko & Jinchi Lv, 2009. "DASSO: connections between the Dantzig selector and lasso," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(1), pages 127-142, January.
    20. Soave, David & Lawless, Jerald F., 2023. "Regularized regression for two phase failure time studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:16:p:2954-:d:889390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.