IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v7y2023i4p74-d1258062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-Waste Management: An Analysis under the Perspective of Conflicts and Shared Responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Layanne Nara Parente Cardoso

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção, Centro Acadêmico do Agreste, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Núcleo de Tecnologia, Caruaru 55014-900, Brazil)

  • Karla Danyelle de Oliveira Miranda

    (Centro Acadêmico do Agreste, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Núcleo de Tecnologia, Caruaru 55014-900, Brazil)

  • Ednael Francisco Vieira da Silva

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção, Centro Acadêmico do Agreste, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Núcleo de Tecnologia, Caruaru 55014-900, Brazil)

  • Patricia Guarnieri

    (Department of Business Administration, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil)

  • José Leão e Silva Filho

    (Centro Acadêmico do Agreste, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Núcleo de Tecnologia, Caruaru 55014-900, Brazil)

  • Lúcio Camara e Silva

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção, Centro Acadêmico do Agreste, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Núcleo de Tecnologia, Caruaru 55014-900, Brazil
    Centro Acadêmico do Agreste, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Núcleo de Tecnologia, Caruaru 55014-900, Brazil)

Abstract

Background : The Brazilian National Solid Waste Policy establishes the shared responsibility of all actors involved in e-waste generation and management; however, some conflicts of interest need interventions and approaches for preventing them. Objective : This paper proposes using a graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) decision support system to simulate the analysis and resolution of realistic e-waste management conflicts. Method : A systematic literature review focused on e-waste management, shared responsibility and conflict management was conducted, and a graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR) decision support system was applied to generate a framework to address this context. Results : The need for commitment agreements promoted by government institutions in partnerships with companies involved in the process is essential since the principle of shared responsibility requires educational actions, favoring efficiency in the reverse logistics recovery procedures for e-waste. Understanding the interconnected causes of conflicts and their facets is crucial for effective resolution and prevention, aiding comprehension, focused interventions, and evidence-based decision-making for transformative change amidst conflicting stakeholder objectives in the case of WEEE management. These results can be helpful for academics and practitioners working in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Layanne Nara Parente Cardoso & Karla Danyelle de Oliveira Miranda & Ednael Francisco Vieira da Silva & Patricia Guarnieri & José Leão e Silva Filho & Lúcio Camara e Silva, 2023. "E-Waste Management: An Analysis under the Perspective of Conflicts and Shared Responsibility," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:7:y:2023:i:4:p:74-:d:1258062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/7/4/74/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/7/4/74/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bouzon, Marina & Govindan, Kannan & Rodriguez, Carlos M.Taboada & Campos, Lucila M.S., 2016. "Identification and analysis of reverse logistics barriers using fuzzy Delphi method and AHP," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 182-197.
    2. Regina Negri Pagani & João Luiz Kovaleski & Luis Mauricio Resende, 2015. "Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 2109-2135, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carolinne Secco & Maria Eduarda Kounaris Fuziki & Angelo Marcelo Tusset & Giane Gonçalves Lenzi, 2023. "Reactive Processes for H 2 S Removal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Marcela Marçal Alves Pinto & João Luiz Kovaleski & Rui Tadashi Yoshino & Regina Negri Pagani, 2019. "Knowledge and Technology Transfer Influencing the Process of Innovation in Green Supply Chain Management: A Multicriteria Model Based on the DEMATEL Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-33, June.
    3. Qinglan Liu & Longjian Yang & Miying Yang, 2021. "Digitalisation for Water Sustainability: Barriers to Implementing Circular Economy in Smart Water Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-28, October.
    4. André Luiz Soares & Antonio Augusto de Paula Xavier & Ariel Orlei Michaloski, 2020. "Occupational Risk Evaluation through Infrared Thermography: Development and Proposal of a Rapid Screening Tool for Risk Assessment Arising from Repetitive Actions of the Upper Limbs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Puppala, Harish & Peddinti, Pranav R.T. & Tamvada, Jagannadha Pawan & Ahuja, Jaya & Kim, Byungmin, 2023. "Barriers to the adoption of new technologies in rural areas: The case of unmanned aerial vehicles for precision agriculture in India," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    6. Marcia Sierdovski & Luiz Alberto Pilatti & Priscila Rubbo, 2022. "Organizational Competencies in the Development of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria in the Industrial Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    7. K. Mathiyazhagan & Srijit Krishnan & Uma Bharathi & Andrea Appolloni, 2021. "Pathways towards reverse logistics adoption in Indian educational institutes: a challenging factors analysis," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(3), pages 661-689, September.
    8. Chun-Chieh Tseng & Jun-Yi Zeng & Min-Liang Hsieh & Chih-Hung Hsu, 2022. "Analysis of Innovation Drivers of New and Old Kinetic Energy Conversion Using a Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Model in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Chinese Case," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-25, October.
    9. Murillo Vetroni Barros & Mariane Bigarelli Ferreira & Guilherme Francisco Prado & Cassiano Moro Piekarski & Claudia Tania Picinin, 2020. "The interaction between knowledge management and technology transfer: a current literature review between 2013 and 2018," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1585-1606, October.
    10. Patrícia Guarnieri & Raiane C. C. de Aguiar & Karim M. Thomé & Eluiza Alberto de Morais Watanabe, 2021. "The Role of Logistics in Food Waste Reduction in Wholesalers and Small Retailers of Fruits and Vegetables: A Multiple Case Study," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Cristina Bianca Pocol & Liana Stanca & Dan-Cristian Dabija & Veronica Câmpian & Sergiu Mișcoiu & Ioana Delia Pop, 2023. "A QCA Analysis of Knowledge Co-Creation Based on University–Industry Relationships," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Radu Ciobanu & Drago? Huru & George ?tefan & Margareta Florescu & Danut Mihai & Florin Dobre, 2023. "Investigating Determining Factors Affecting the Waste Collection Rate From Electrical and Electronic Equipment," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(62), pages 134-134, February.
    13. de Oliveira Neto, Geraldo Cardoso & de Jesus Cardoso Correia, Auro & Schroeder, Adriano Michelotti, 2017. "Economic and environmental assessment of recycling and reuse of electronic waste: Multiple case studies in Brazil and Switzerland," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 42-55.
    14. Ipek Kazancoglu & Yigit Kazancoglu & Emel Yarimoglu & Aysun Kahraman, 2020. "A conceptual framework for barriers of circular supply chains for sustainability in the textile industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1477-1492, September.
    15. Flávio Mattos & João Luiz Calmon, 2023. "Social Life Cycle Assessment in Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems with Contribution of Waste Pickers: Literature Review and Proposals for New Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Arthur Henrique Gomes Rossi & Giovanna Bueno Marcondes & Joseane Pontes & Paulo Leitão & Fernanda Tavares Treinta & Luis Mauricio Martins De Resende & Elaine Mosconi & Rui Tadashi Yoshino, 2022. "Lean Tools in the Context of Industry 4.0: Literature Review, Implementation and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-32, September.
    17. Wei-Ming Wang & Hsiao-Han Peng, 2020. "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Evaluation Framework for Urban Sustainable Development," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-22, March.
    18. Ozden Tozanli & Gazi Murat Duman & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2017. "Environmentally Concerned Logistics Operations in Fuzzy Environment: A Literature Survey," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-42, June.
    19. Blandy Pamplona Solis & Julio César Cruz Argüello & Leopoldo Gómez Barba & Mayra Polett Gurrola & Zakaryaa Zarhri & Danna Lizeth TrejoArroyo, 2019. "Bibliometric Analysis of the Mass Transport in a Gas Diffusion Layer in PEM Fuel Cells," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Luthra, Sunil & Sharma, Manu & Kumar, Anil & Joshi, Sudhanshu & Collins, Eva & Mangla, Sachin, 2022. "Overcoming barriers to cross-sector collaboration in circular supply chain management: a multi-method approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:7:y:2023:i:4:p:74-:d:1258062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.