IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v11y2022i2p17-d760499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Extreme Right as a Defender of Human Rights? Parliamentary Debates on COVID-19 Emergency Legislation in Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Max Steuer

    (Department of Political Science, Comenius University in Bratislava, 81499 Bratislava, Slovakia
    Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat 131001, India)

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the protection of public health became a political priority worldwide. Slovakia’s COVID-19 response was initially praised as a global success. However, major rights restrictions were introduced in spring 2020, with some of these endorsed by the parliament. This article uses Rossiter’s and Schmitt’s concepts of the exception and Agamben’s distinction between life and survival to highlight the risks pertaining to the framing of the protection of public health as contradictory to human rights guarantees. It investigates how human rights were discussed by Slovak parliamentarians in relation to key legislation, that introduced a COVID-19 contact tracing app and allowed repeated prolongation of health emergencies by the executive with parliamentary approval. The findings indicate that democratic parliamentarians prioritized public health considerations framed in terms of security and effectiveness rather than rights, dissociating biological survival from political life. In contrast, extreme political actors became outspoken critics of emergencies, referring to human rights. As such, the deliberations represent a missed opportunity by democratic legislators to justify public health protection via a human rights lens and risk undermining democracy in Slovakia.

Suggested Citation

  • Max Steuer, 2022. "The Extreme Right as a Defender of Human Rights? Parliamentary Debates on COVID-19 Emergency Legislation in Slovakia," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:17-:d:760499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/2/17/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/2/17/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jef Huysmans & Alessandra Buonfino, 2008. "Politics of Exception and Unease: Immigration, Asylum and Terrorism in Parliamentary Debates in the UK," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(4), pages 766-788, December.
    2. Jef Huysmans & Alessandra Buonfino, 2008. "Politics of Exception and Unease: Immigration, Asylum and Terrorism in Parliamentary Debates in the UK," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56, pages 766-788, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Didier Bigo & Elspeth Guild, 2019. "International Law and European Migration Policy: Where Is the Terrorism Risk?," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Michelle L. James & Rachel Forrester-Jones, 2022. "Human-Centred Design in UK Asylum Social Protection," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Hillman, Arye L. & Long, Ngo V., 2018. "Policies and prizes," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 99-109.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:17-:d:760499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.