IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v8y2019i11p174-d287677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transition of Collective Land in Modernistic Residential Settings in New Belgrade, Serbia

Author

Listed:
  • Milica P. Milojević

    (Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Marija Maruna

    (Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Aleksandra Djordjević

    (Faculty of Architecture, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

Turbulent periods of transition from socialism to neoliberal capitalism, which have affected the relationships between holders of power and governing structures in Serbia, have left a lasting impact on the urban spaces of Belgrade’s cityscape. The typical assumption is that the transformation of the urban form in the post-socialist transition is induced by planning interventions which serve to legitimize these neoliberal aspirations. The methodological approach of this paper is broadly structured as a chronological case analysis at three levels: the identification of three basic periods of institutional change, historical analysis of the urban policies that permitted transformation of the subject area, and morphogenesis of the selected site alongside the Sava River in New Belgrade. Neoliberal aspirations are traced through the moments of destruction and moments of creation as locally specific manifestations of neoliberal mechanisms observable through the urban form. Comparison of all three levels of the study traces how planning and political decisions have affected strategic directions of development and, consequently, the dynamics and spatial logic of how new structures have invaded the street frontage. The paper demonstrates that planning interventions in the post-socialist transition period, guided by the neoliberal mechanisms, has had a profound impact on the super-block morphology.

Suggested Citation

  • Milica P. Milojević & Marija Maruna & Aleksandra Djordjević, 2019. "Transition of Collective Land in Modernistic Residential Settings in New Belgrade, Serbia," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:11:p:174-:d:287677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/11/174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/8/11/174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zorica Nedović-Budić & Sasha Tsenkova & Peter Marcuse, 2006. "The urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe," Contributions to Economics, in: Sasha Tsenkova & Zorica Nedović-Budić (ed.), The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe, chapter 1, pages 3-20, Springer.
    2. Aidan While, 2006. "Modernism vs Urban Renaissance: Negotiating Post-war Heritage in English City Centres," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(13), pages 2399-2419, December.
    3. Sasha Tsenkova, 2006. "Beyond transitions: Understanding urban change in post-socialist cities," Contributions to Economics, in: Sasha Tsenkova & Zorica Nedović-Budić (ed.), The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe, chapter 2, pages 21-50, Springer.
    4. Vladan Djokić & Jelena Ristić Trajković & Verica Krstić, 2016. "An Environmental Critique: Impact of Socialist Ideology on the Ecological and Cultural Sensitivity of Belgrade’s Large-Scale Residential Settlements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Iván Tosics, 2006. "Spatial restructuring in post-socialist Budapest," Contributions to Economics, in: Sasha Tsenkova & Zorica Nedović-Budić (ed.), The Urban Mosaic of Post-Socialist Europe, chapter 7, pages 131-150, Springer.
    6. Matthew Carmona, 2009. "Design Coding and the Creative, Market and Regulatory Tyrannies of Practice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(12), pages 2643-2667, November.
    7. Polona Tominc & Miroslav Rebernik, 2007. "Growth Aspirations and Cultural Support for Entrepreneurship: A Comparison of Post-Socialist Countries," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 239-255, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vladan Djokić & Aleksandra Milovanović & Jelena Ristić Trajković, 2020. "The Textuality of the Modernist Rural Landscape: Belgrade Agricultural Combine (PKB) as a Driver of the Urban Development of Third Belgrade," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Aleksandra Milovanović & Anica Dragutinovic & Ana Nikezić & Uta Pottgiesser & Mihajlo Stojanovski & Ana Ivanovska Deskova & Jovan Ivanovski & Tea Damjanovska, 2022. "Rehabilitation of Mass Housing as a Contribution to Social Equality: Insights from the East-West European Academic Dialogue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-31, July.
    3. Josef Navrátil & Petr Klusáček & Stanislav Martinát & Petr Dvořák, 2021. "Emergence of Centralized (Collective) and Decentralized (Individual) Environmentally Friendly Solutions during the Regeneration of a Residential Building in a Post-Socialist City," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheludkov, Alexander & Kamp, Johannes & Müller, Daniel, 2021. "Decreasing labor intensity in agriculture and the accessibility of major cities shape the rural population decline in postsocialist Russia," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 62(4), pages 481-506.
    2. Aleksandra DJURASOVIC & Joerg KNIELING, 2015. "Urban transition and sustainability. The case of the city of Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 6, pages 5-29, June.
    3. Peter Lugosi & David Bell & Krisztina Lugosi, 2010. "Hospitality, Culture and Regeneration: Urban Decay, Entrepreneurship and the ‘Ruin’ Bars of Budapest," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(14), pages 3079-3101, December.
    4. Ines Grigorescu & Cristina Dumitrică & Monica Dumitrașcu & Bianca Mitrică & Costin Dumitrașcu, 2021. "Urban Development and the (Re)use of the Communist-Built Industrial and Agricultural Sites after 1990. The Showcase of Bucharest–Ilfov Development Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Andrew Barnfield & Anna Plyushteva, 2016. "Cycling in the post-socialist city: On travelling by bicycle in Sofia, Bulgaria," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(9), pages 1822-1835, July.
    6. Jan Ženka & Marcela Chreneková & Lucie Kokešová & Veronika Svetlíková, 2021. "Industrial Structure and Economic Resilience of Non-Metropolitan Regions: An Empirical Base for the Smart Specialization Policies," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Mihail Eva & Alexandra Cehan & Alexandra Lazăr, 2021. "Patterns of Urban Shrinkage: A Systematic Analysis of Romanian Cities (1992–2020)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, July.
    8. Gloria Leonor Ortiz Morales & Juan Carlos Ramos Aguilar & Katherin Yineth Lozada Morales, 2022. "Culture as an obstacle for entrepreneurship," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Tandarić, Neven & Ives, Christopher D. & Watkins, Charles, 2022. "From city in the park to “greenery in plant pots”: The influence of socialist and post-socialist planning on opportunities for cultural ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Szymon Marcińczak & Iwona Sagan, 2011. "The Socio-spatial Restructuring of Šódź, Poland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1789-1809, July.
    11. Ratka ÄŒolić & Ä orÄ‘e Milić & Jasna Petrić & NataÅ¡a ÄŒolić, 2022. "Institutional capacity development within the national urban policy formation process – Participants’ views," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 69-89, February.
    12. Dorota Mantey, 2021. "Objective and Subjective Determinants of Neighborhood Satisfaction in the Context of Retrofitting Suburbs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Turró, Andreu & Urbano, David & Peris-Ortiz, Marta, 2014. "Culture and innovation: The moderating effect of cultural values on corporate entrepreneurship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 360-369.
    14. Lanivich, Stephen E. & Smith, Adam & Levasseur, Ludvig & Pidduck, Robert J. & Busenitz, Lowell & Tang, Jintong, 2022. "Advancing entrepreneurial alertness: Review, synthesis, and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1165-1176.
    15. Antonia Mercedes García-Cabrera & María Gracia García-Soto & Juan José Durán-Herrera, 2016. "Opportunity motivation and SME internationalisation in emerging countries: Evidence from entrepreneurs’ perception of institutions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 879-910, September.
    16. Perić Ana, 2016. "Institutional Cooperation in the Brownfield Regeneration Process: Experiences from Central and Eastern European Countries," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 21-46, June.
    17. Jana Temelová & Jakub Novák & Martin Ou rednícek & Petra Puldová, 2011. "Housing Estates in the Czech Republic after Socialism: Various Trajectories and Inner Differentiation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(9), pages 1811-1834, July.
    18. Ingrid Verheul & Linda van Mil, 2008. "What Determines the Growth Ambition of Dutch Early-Stage Entrepreneurs?," Scales Research Reports H200811, EIM Business and Policy Research.
    19. Nir Mualam & Nir Barak, 2019. "Evaluating Comparative Research: Mapping and Assessing Current Trends in Built Heritage Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-27, January.
    20. László Szerb, 2008. "The Examination of the Level of Entrepreneurship in Eight Central Eastern European Countries," Proceedings-6th International Conference on Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2008), in: György Kadocsa (ed.),6th International Conference on Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking MEB 2008-Proceedings, pages 69-83, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:11:p:174-:d:287677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.