IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i5p1066-d1146545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Productive Landscape to Agritouristic Landscape? The Evidence of an Agricultural Heritage System—Zhejiang Huzhou Mulberry-Dyke and Fish-Pond System

Author

Listed:
  • Ran Zhou

    (College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Lu Huang

    (College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    The Rural Development Academy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Ke Wang

    (College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    The Rural Development Academy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Wenhao Hu

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A&F University, Linan 311300, China)

Abstract

Agricultural Heritage Systems exhibit multiple functions of agricultural production, ecological protection, and invaluable cultures and landscapes. The mulberry-dyke and fish-pond system is an important agricultural heritage. The Nanxun District of Huzhou, China is currently the area with the most complete and largest mulberry dykes and fish ponds in the world. In the past thirty years, with changes in labor force distribution and consumer demand, the production function of mulberry dyke and fish ponds has been challenged, and the production landscape as the carrier of farming culture has been threatened. Studying the spatial characteristics and optimization of mulberry dykes and fish ponds is of great significance to the sustainable development of the regional economy, culture, and environment. This study analyzes the spatial and temporal pattern evolution of mulberry dyke and fish ponds in Nanxun District since 1975. Based on the evaluation of the environmental carrying capacity of fish ponds, and according to the development goals of agricultural heritage inheritance and “planting and breeding balance”, the Future Land Use Simulation model is adopted to optimize the study area. The results show the following findings: (1) From 1975 to 2019, fish ponds and construction land increased significantly, mulberry fields and paddy fields decreased significantly, the scale of mulberry dykes and fish ponds decreased significantly, and the proportion of mulberry dykes and fish ponds was seriously unbalanced; (2) The overall scale of fish-pond breeding in Nanxun District is too large, and the proportion of farming and breeding needs to be adjusted; (3) In view of economic growth, cultural inheritance, and environmental protection, this paper simulates the spatial layout of mulberry dykes and fish ponds in 2035, and divides mulberry dykes and fish ponds in Nanxun District into a display area and an industrial development area. The display area restores the traditional mulberry dykes and fish ponds to the greatest extent. The industrial development zone maximizes the economic benefits of agriculture on the basis of “balancing planting and breeding”. Overall, this study provides a reference for protecting Huzhou mulberry-dyke and fish-pond agricultural heritage, optimizing agricultural production space, balancing human–environment relationship, and promoting regional sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ran Zhou & Lu Huang & Ke Wang & Wenhao Hu, 2023. "From Productive Landscape to Agritouristic Landscape? The Evidence of an Agricultural Heritage System—Zhejiang Huzhou Mulberry-Dyke and Fish-Pond System," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:1066-:d:1146545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/1066/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/5/1066/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siqing Xu & Rong Wang & Thomas Gasser & Philippe Ciais & Josep Peñuelas & Yves Balkanski & Olivier Boucher & Ivan A. Janssens & Jordi Sardans & James H. Clark & Junji Cao & Xiaofan Xing & Jianmin Chen, 2022. "Delayed use of bioenergy crops might threaten climate and food security," Nature, Nature, vol. 609(7926), pages 299-306, September.
    2. Yongxun Zhang & Xiande Li, 2022. "Protecting Traditional Agricultural Landscapes by Promoting Industrial Integration Development: Practices from Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (IAHS) Sites in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Elizabeth Bryan & Claudia Ringler & Nicole Lefore, 2022. "To ease the world food crisis, focus resources on women and girls," Nature, Nature, vol. 609(7925), pages 28-31, September.
    4. Lingyan Xu & Jing Jiang & Mengyi Lu & Jianguo Du, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Agricultural Intensive Management and Its Influence on Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Hao Li & Hongyu Chen & Minghao Wu & Kai Zhou & Xiang Zhang & Zhicheng Liu, 2022. "A Dynamic Evaluation Method of Urban Ecological Networks Combining Graphab and the FLUS Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Shaohui Liu & Qingwen Min & Wenjun Jiao & Chuanjiang Liu & Jianzhong Yin, 2018. "Integrated Emergy and Economic Evaluation of Huzhou Mulberry-Dyke and Fish-Pond Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-11, October.
    7. Yin Zhang & Chunyun Guan & Zhengyou Li & Jun Luo & Bo Ren & Can Chen & Ying Xu & Jiaolong Ding & Huang Huang, 2023. "Review of Rice–Fish–Duck Symbiosis System in China—One of the Globally Important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Fatma Mhadhbi & Claude Napoléone, 2022. "Does Agricultural Intensification Enhance Rural Wellbeing? A Structural Model Assessment at the Sub-Communal Level: A Case Study in Tunisia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Andrianarimanana, Mihasina Harinaivo & Yongjian, Pu & Rabezanahary Tanteliniaina, Mirindra Finaritra, 2023. "Assessment of the importance of climate, land, and soil on the global supply for agricultural products and global food security: Evidence from Madagascar," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    10. Antonio Santoro & Qingyi Yu & Francesco Piras & Beatrice Fiore & Alessandra Bazzurro & Mauro Agnoletti, 2022. "From Flood Control System to Agroforestry Heritage System: Past, Present and Future of the Mulberry-Dykes and Fishponds System of Huzhou City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Patrick Caron & Gabriel Ferrero de Loma-Osorio & Marco Ferroni & Bernard Lehmann & Thomas C. Mettenleiter & Youba Sokona, 2022. "Global food security: pool collective intelligence," Nature, Nature, vol. 612(7941), pages 631-631, December.
    12. Yingxue Li & Zhaoshun Liu & Shujie Li & Xiang Li, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Simulation Analysis of Land Use and Carbon Storage Changes in Changchun City Based on FLUS and InVEST Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Mingtao Yan & Jianji Zhao & Jiajun Qiao & Dong Han & Qiankun Zhu & Yang Yang & Qi Liu & Zhipeng Wang, 2023. "Spatial Pattern Evolution and Influencing Factors on Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution in Small Town Areas under the Background of Rapid Industrialization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, February.
    14. Fei Zhao & Changqiao Zhu & Jia’en Zhang & Shiming Luo & Yueyi Feng & Huimin Xiang & Yichen Jiang & Xiali Lu & Yi Tian, 2023. "Is Land Expropriation to Keep Agricultural Use an Effective Strategy for the Conservation of an Urban Agricultural Heritage System? Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Hiroyuki Kajihara & Su Zhang & Wonhee You & Qingwen Min, 2018. "Concerns and Opportunities around Cultural Heritage in East Asian Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Menghan Zhang & Yue Yu & Meizi Liu & Jingyi Liu, 2024. "Opportunities for China’s Agricultural Heritage Systems under the “Digital Nomadism” Trend—A Stakeholder-Weighted Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Shuyang Tang & Ziwei Liu & Yumei Li & Mingqin Zhou, 2024. "Enhancing Sustainability through Ecosystem Services Evaluation: A Case Study of the Mulberry-Dyke and Fish-Pond System in Digang Village," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sittichok Plaiphum & Roengchai Tansuchat, 2023. "Cultural Capital of Sea Salt Farming in Ban Laem District of Phetchaburi Province as per the Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Lin Meng & Chuanguang Zhu & Jie Pu & Bo Wen & Wentao Si, 2022. "Study on the Influence Mechanism of Intangible Cultural Heritage Distribution from Man–Land Relationship Perspective: A Case Study in Shandong Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Rocío Silva-Pérez & Gema González-Romero, 2022. "GIAHS as an Instrument to Articulate the Landscape and Territorialized Agrifood Systems—The Example of La Axarquía (Malaga Province, Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Winda Ika Susanti & Sri Noor Cholidah & Fahmuddin Agus, 2024. "Agroecological Nutrient Management Strategy for Attaining Sustainable Rice Self-Sufficiency in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, January.
    5. Zechen Wang & Zhenqin Shi & Jingeng Huo & Wenbo Zhu & Yanhui Yan & Na Ding, 2023. "Construction and Optimization of an Ecological Network in Funiu Mountain Area Based on MSPA and MCR Models, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, August.
    6. Xingguo Gu & Qixian Lai & Moucheng Liu & Ziqun He & Qingyang Zhang & Qingwen Min, 2019. "Sustainability Assessment of a Qingyuan Mushroom Culture System Based on Emergy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Yonghua Li & Song Yao & Hezhou Jiang & Huarong Wang & Qinchuan Ran & Xinyun Gao & Xinyi Ding & Dandong Ge, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Prediction of Carbon Storage: An Integrated Framework Based on the MOP–PLUS–InVEST Model and an Applied Case Study in Hangzhou, East China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Anita Šalić & Bruno Zelić, 2022. "A Game Changer: Microfluidic Technology for Enhancing Biohydrogen Production—Small Size for Great Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Tong Lin & Dafang Wu & Muzhuang Yang & Peifang Ma & Yanyan Liu & Feng Liu & Ziying Gan, 2022. "Evolution and Simulation of Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Storage and Sustainability Assessment in Karst Areas: A Case Study of Guizhou Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Enrico Pomatto & Marco Devecchi & Federica Larcher, 2022. "Assessment of the Terraced Landscapes’ Integrity: A GIS-Based Approach in a Potential GIAHS-FAO Site (Northwest Piedmont, Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Soo-Kyeong Jang & Hanseob Jeong & In-Gyu Choi, 2023. "The Effect of Cellulose Crystalline Structure Modification on Glucose Production from Chemical-Composition-Controlled Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, March.
    12. Wenjun Jiao & Xiao Yang & Qingwen Min, 2022. "A Review of the Progress in Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Monitoring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Huiqi Song & Pengwei Chen & Yongxun Zhang & Youcheng Chen, 2021. "Study Progress of Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (IAHS): A Literature Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Hua Zhou & Yue Ren & Bingxin Yao & Zhenhua Li & Ming Xu & Lina Ma & Xianggui Kong & Lirong Zheng & Mingfei Shao & Haohong Duan, 2023. "Scalable electrosynthesis of commodity chemicals from biomass by suppressing non-Faradaic transformations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Juan Xu & Cuicui Jiao & Dalun Zheng & Luoxin Li, 2023. "Agricultural Land Suitability Assessment at the County Scale in Taiyuan, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Keshav Lall Maharjan & Clarisse Mendoza Gonzalvo & Wilson Florendo Aala, 2021. "Leveraging Japanese Sado Island Farmers’ GIAHS Inclusivity by Understanding Their Perceived Involvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    17. Marta Arnés García & José Luis Yagüe & Víctor Luis de Nicolás & José M. Díaz-Puente, 2020. "Characterization of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, February.
    18. Yuan Shen & Linlin Shi & Yueyue Tao & Haihou Wang & Changying Lu & Siyuan Li & Mingxing Shen, 2022. "Sustainability Evaluation and Optimization on the Modern Agro-Pastoral Circular System Integrating Emergy Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Hongye Li & Yutian Hu & Hao Li & Jinjie Ren & Rujie Shao & Zhicheng Liu, 2023. "Assessing the Impact of Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urbanization on Carbon Storage in the Mega-Urban Agglomeration Area: Case Study of Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Ziwei Li & Qiuying Ma & Yong Wang & Fengxue Shi & Haibo Jiang & Chunguang He, 2024. "Study on the Structure, Efficiency, and Driving Factors of an Eco-Agricultural Park Based on Emergy: A Case Study of Jinchuan Eco-Agricultural Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:5:p:1066-:d:1146545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.