IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i5p639-d802444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Stock and Change Rate under Different Grazing Management Practices in Semiarid Pastoral Ecosystem of Eastern Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Haftay Hailu Gebremedhn

    (African Center of Excellence for Climate-Smart Agriculture and Biodiversity Conservation, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa P.O. Box 138, Ethiopia)

  • Tessema Zewdu Kelkay

    (College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Debark University, Debark P.O. Box 90, Ethiopia)

  • Yayanshet Tesfay

    (College of Dryland Agriculture and Natural Resources, Mekele University, Mekelle P.O. Box 23, Ethiopia)

  • Samuel Tuffa

    (Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 81265, Ethiopia)

  • Sintayehu Workeneh Dejene

    (African Center of Excellence for Climate-Smart Agriculture and Biodiversity Conservation, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa P.O. Box 138, Ethiopia)

  • Sylvanus Mensah

    (Laboratoire de Biomathématiques et d’Estimations Forestières, Université d’Abomey Calavi, Cotonou 04 BP 1525, Benin)

  • Adam John Mears Devenish

    (Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK)

  • Anthony Egeru

    (Training and Community Development, Regional Universities Forum for Capacity Building in Agriculture (RUFORUM), Kampala P.O. Box 16811, Uganda)

Abstract

Grazing management strategies tend to have different effects on rangeland plant production. Changes in grazing management can, therefore, affect the carbon stock potential of rangelands. Despite rangeland ecosystems being important global sinks for carbon, we know relatively little about the effect of traditional grazing management practices on their potential to store carbon. In this study, we evaluated the carbon stock and change rate of rangelands using three traditional grazing management practices in the semiarid pastoral ecosystem of eastern Ethiopia. By comparing data on vegetation and soil carbon stocks, we found that there was a strong significant difference ( p < 0.001) between these different management practices. In particular, the establishment of enclosures was associated with an annual increase in carbon stocks of soil (3%) and woody (11.9%) and herbaceous (57.6%) biomass, when compared to communal open lands. Both enclosure and browsing management practices were found to have the highest levels of soil organic carbon stocks, differing only in terms of the amount of woody and herbaceous biomass. Thus, modest changes in traditional grazing management practices can play an important role in carbon storage and sequestration. Further research is required on a wider range of traditional pastoral management practices across space and time, as understanding these processes is key to combating global climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Haftay Hailu Gebremedhn & Tessema Zewdu Kelkay & Yayanshet Tesfay & Samuel Tuffa & Sintayehu Workeneh Dejene & Sylvanus Mensah & Adam John Mears Devenish & Anthony Egeru, 2022. "Carbon Stock and Change Rate under Different Grazing Management Practices in Semiarid Pastoral Ecosystem of Eastern Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:639-:d:802444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/639/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/639/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beyene, Fekadu, 2010. "Driving forces in the expansion of enclosure among pastoral and agropastoral herders in Ethiopia," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 49(2), pages 1-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:639-:d:802444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.