IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i8p803-d605671.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interaction between Land Financing Strategy and the Implementation Deviation of Local Governments’ Cultivated Land Protection Policy in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xupeng Zhang

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Danling Chen

    (Department of Land Management, College of Public Administration, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430074, China
    Institute of Ecological and Environmental Economics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Xinhai Lu

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yifeng Tang

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Bin Jiang

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

The deviation of implementation of China’s cultivated land protection policy is the core problem urgently needing to be solved in the process of protecting the country’s cultivated land. This paper aims to explain the universality of this implementation deviation from the perspective of the spatial interaction of fiscal land strategies. Based on the data of 30 provinces in China from 2000 to 2015, the spatial Durbin model is used to validate the corresponding theoretical hypothesis. The results show that: (1) At the national or regional level, the given local government’s behavior with regard to land conveyance and land-orientation investment will aggravate implementation deviations of the cultivated land protection policy in the local area. (2) Land conveyance and land-orientation investment behaviors cause a spatial spillover effect. As a result, these behaviors not only exacerbate the implementation deviation of the cultivated land protection policy in the local area, but also exacerbate this deviation in adjacent areas. (3) The spatial spillover effects of land conveyance and land-orientation investment strategies in the eastern, central and western regions of China show marked differences. However, in general, compared with the land transfer strategy, the spatial interactions of the land-orientation investment strategy represent the more important factor that gives rise to the widespread deviation in the implementation of the cultivated land protection policy. (4) The transformation of the performance appraisal system can help to weaken the interactive behavior of the land financing strategy. This can, in turn, not only alleviate the deviation degree of the implementation of the local cultivated land protection policy, but also the deviation degree of the implementation of the latter in adjacent areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Xupeng Zhang & Danling Chen & Xinhai Lu & Yifeng Tang & Bin Jiang, 2021. "Interaction between Land Financing Strategy and the Implementation Deviation of Local Governments’ Cultivated Land Protection Policy in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:803-:d:605671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/8/803/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/8/803/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Nannan, 2019. "What gave rise to China’s land finance?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Kurowska, Krystyna & Kryszk, Hubert & Marks-Bielska, Renata & Mika, Monika & Leń, Przemysław, 2020. "Conversion of agricultural and forest land to other purposes in the context of land protection: Evidence from Polish experience," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    3. Liang, Xinyuan & Jin, Xiaobin & Sun, Rui & Han, Bo & Liu, Jing & Zhou, Yinkang, 2021. "A typical phenomenon of cultivated land use in China's economically developed areas: Anti-intensification in Jiangsu Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Mo, Jiawei, 2018. "Land financing and economic growth: Evidence from Chinese counties," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 218-239.
    5. Xinhai Lu & Yanwei Zhang & Handong Tang, 2021. "Modeling and Simulation of Dissemination of Cultivated Land Protection Policies in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Guo, Shen & Shi, Yingying, 2018. "Infrastructure investment in China: A model of local government choice under land financing," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 24-35.
    7. Huang, Zhonghua & Du, Xuejun, 2018. "Holding the market under the stimulus plan: Local government financing vehicles' land purchasing behavior in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 85-100.
    8. Siyu Zhang & Weiyan Hu & Liejia Huang & Hongjie Du, 2019. "Exploring the Effectiveness of Multifunctional Cultivated Land Protection Linking Supply to Demand in Value Engineering Theory: Evidence from Wuhan Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Zhou, Yang & Li, Xunhuan & Liu, Yansui, 2021. "Cultivated land protection and rational use in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    10. Xie, Hualin & Huang, Yingqian & Choi, Yongrok & Shi, Jiaying, 2021. "Evaluating the sustainable intensification of cultivated land use based on emergy analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    11. Hu, Fox Z.Y. & Qian, Jiwei, 2017. "Land-based finance, fiscal autonomy and land supply for affordable housing in urban China: A prefecture-level analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 454-460.
    12. Kuang, Bing & Han, Jing & Lu, Xinhai & Zhang, Xupeng & Fan, Xiangyu, 2020. "Quantitative evaluation of China’s cultivated land protection policies based on the PMC-Index model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Tang, Peng & Shi, Xiaoping & Gao, Jinlong & Feng, Shuyi & Qu, Futian, 2019. "Demystifying the key for intoxicating land finance in China: An empirical study through the lens of government expenditure," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 302-309.
    14. Fan, Xin & Qiu, Sainan & Sun, Yukun, 2020. "Land finance dependence and urban land marketization in China: The perspective of strategic choice of local governments on land transfer," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. Su, Mo & Guo, Renzhong & Hong, Wuyang, 2019. "Institutional transition and implementation path for cultivated land protection in highly urbanized regions: A case study of Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 493-501.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinhai Lu & Mingxu Bai & Bing Kuang & Danling Chen, 2021. "Unlocking the Relationship between Land Finance and Regional Integration," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Xiaoying Ju & Huizhao Li & Peng Yao & Jianxu Liu & Fei Chen & Songsak Sriboonchitta, 2022. "Analysis of the Impact of Industrial Land Price Distortion on Overcapacity in the Textile Industry and Its Sustainability in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Danling Chen & Wenbo Hu, 2023. "Temporal and Spatial Effects of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Cultivated Land Treatment on Agricultural Development Resilience," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Di & Ren, Cairu & Zhou, Tao, 2021. "Understanding the impact of land finance on industrial structure change in China: Insights from a spatial econometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Siyu Han & Mengcheng Wang & Qi Liu & Renyang Wang & Guoliang Ou & Lu Zhang, 2022. "The Influence of Land Disposition Derived from Land Finance on Urban Innovation in China: Mechanism Discussion and Empirical Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Gyourko, Joseph & Shen, Yang & Wu, Jing & Zhang, Rongjie, 2022. "Land finance in China: Analysis and review," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Xinhai Lu & Mingxu Bai & Bing Kuang & Danling Chen, 2021. "Unlocking the Relationship between Land Finance and Regional Integration," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Xiaodong Yang & Weilong Wang & Xufeng Su & Siyu Ren & Qiying Ran & Jianlong Wang & Jianhong Cao, 2023. "Analysis of the influence of land finance on haze pollution: An empirical study based on 269 prefecture‐level cities in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 101-134, March.
    6. Yanwei Zhang & Xinhai Lu & Yucheng Zou & Tiangui Lv, 2022. "Nudging Strategies for Arable Land Protection Behavior in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Danxia Zhang & Juanfeng Zhang & Rui Han & Dongsheng Zhan, 2022. "Two‐stage development, allocation strategies' effect, and industrial land policies' adjustment, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 890-909, June.
    8. Yubo Wang & Xizhu Yang, 2022. "Fiscal Ecological Cost of Land in China: Estimation and Regional Differences," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Tang, Peng & Shi, Xiaoping & Gao, Jinlong & Feng, Shuyi & Qu, Futian, 2019. "Demystifying the key for intoxicating land finance in China: An empirical study through the lens of government expenditure," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 302-309.
    10. Xiaotong Li & Ying Li & Jinlan Ni & Jia Yuan, 2022. "Master development, land appreciation, and government finance: Evidence from the Disney project in Shanghai," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(4), pages 1027-1046, August.
    11. Zixing Wang & Meirong Zhang, 2023. "The Distributional Effects Associated with Land Finance in China: A Perspective Based on the Urban–Rural Income Gap," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.
    12. Ke Zhao & Danling Chen & Xupeng Zhang & Xiaojie Zhang, 2022. "How Do Urban Land Expansion, Land Finance, and Economic Growth Interact?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Fei Bao & Zhenzhi Zhao, 2022. "“Takeover” and “Activation” Effects of National Strategies for Industrial Relocation—Based on the Perspective of Marketisation of Land Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    14. Zhang, Bangbang & Li, Jiaxiang & Tian, Wenmiao & Chen, Haibin & Kong, Xiangbin & Chen, Wei & Zhao, Minjuan & Xia, Xianli, 2020. "Spatio-temporal variances and risk evaluation of land finance in China at the provincial level from 1998 to 2017," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. Liu, Qiongzhi & Bai, Yun & Song, Hexin, 2023. "The crowding out effect of government debt on corporate financing: Firm-level evidence from China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 264-272.
    16. Tinghui Li & Jiehua Ma & Bin Mo, 2021. "Does the Land Market Have an Impact on Green Total Factor Productivity? A Case Study on China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Peng Wang & Zinan Shao & Jian Wang & Qun Wu, 2021. "The impact of land finance on urban land use efficiency: A panel threshold model for Chinese provinces," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 310-331, March.
    18. De Zhou & Ruilin Tian & Zhulu Lin & Liming Liu & Junfeng Wang & Shijia Feng, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Risk Assessment of Land Finance: Evidence from China," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, October.
    19. Tang, Peng & Feng, Yue & Li, Min & Zhang, Yanyan, 2021. "Can the performance evaluation change from central government suppress illegal land use in local governments? A new interpretation of Chinese decentralisation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    20. Sun, Xueqing & Xiang, Pengcheng & Cong, Kexin, 2023. "Research on early warning and control measures for arable land resource security," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:8:p:803-:d:605671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.