IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i4p367-d529029.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design as an Indicator of Tourist Destination Change: The Concept Renewal Cycle at Watkins Glen State Park

Author

Listed:
  • Hans Klein-Hewett

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA)

Abstract

For decades, the Tourism Area Life Cycle (TALC) model, its iterations, and its critics have shaped the conversation about change and adaptation at tourist destinations. However, few life cycle models consider the designed landscape as a factor in the evolutionary process or as a signifier of change. This oversight is problematic because the landscape, the aggregation of consciously designed spaces and amenities, is where tourism takes place. It is the physical manifestation of the tourist destination and therefore significantly influences how the site is organized, consumed, and evaluated. To illustrate the landscape’s importance, this article proposes a new life cycle model called the Concept Renewal Cycle (CRC), which tracks the intent of the designed landscape, the concept, to understand and document destination change. The model introduces and utilizes relevancy as the variable that determines concept success and instigates action. The proposed model and other prominent life cycle models are analyzed and compared through the case study of Watkins Glen State Park in New York state. While the other models struggle to reflect the evolution at Watkins Glen, the CRC shows resilience by eschewing TALC’s inevitable, time-based decline structure in favor of a cyclical pattern where concept revision allows for prolonged maturity.

Suggested Citation

  • Hans Klein-Hewett, 2021. "Design as an Indicator of Tourist Destination Change: The Concept Renewal Cycle at Watkins Glen State Park," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:367-:d:529029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/4/367/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/4/367/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prato, Tony, 2001. "Modeling carrying capacity for national parks," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 321-331, December.
    2. Wojciech Bal & Magdalena Czalczynska-Podolska, 2020. "The Stages of the Cultural Landscape Transformation of Seaside Resorts in Poland against the Background of the Evolving Nature of Tourism," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Hördur V. Haraldsson & Rannveig Ólafsdóttir, 2018. "Evolution of Tourism in Natural Destinations and Dynamic Sustainable Thresholds over Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gill Lawson & David Dean & Yuqing He & Xinghua Huang, 2021. "Motivations and Satisfaction of New Zealand Domestic Tourists to Inform Landscape Design in a Nature-Based Setting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tianjian Yang & Ye Li & Simin Zhou & Yu Zhang, 2019. "Dynamic Feedback Analysis of Influencing Factors and Challenges of Dockless Bike-Sharing Sustainability in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Vail, David & Heldt, Tobias, 2004. "Governing snowmobilers in multiple-use landscapes: Swedish and Maine (USA) cases," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 469-483, April.
    3. Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir & Margrét Wendt & Rannveig Ólafsdóttir, 2022. "Tourism Industry Attitudes towards National Parks and Wilderness: A Case Study from the Icelandic Central Highlands," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Theano S. Terkenli, 2021. "Research Advances in Tourism-Landscape Interrelations: An Editorial," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-8, September.
    5. Zhiqiang Gong & Zhuting Zhang & Jianqin Zhou & Jiami Zhou & Wenhui Wang, 2022. "The Evolutionary Process and Mechanism of Cultural Landscapes: An Integrated Perspective of Landscape Ecology and Evolutionary Economic Geography," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Wojciech Bal & Magdalena Czalczynska-Podolska, 2020. "Assessing Architecture-and-Landscape Integration as a Basis for Evaluating the Impact of Construction Projects on the Cultural Landscape of Tourist Seaside Resorts," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-28, December.
    7. Ólafsdóttir, Rannveig & Sæþórsdóttir, Anna Dóra, 2019. "Wind farms in the Icelandic highlands: Attitudes of local residents and tourism service providers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. César Daniel Aguilar-Becerra & Oscar Frausto-Martínez & Hernando Avilés-Pineda & Jair J. Pineda-Pineda & Jennifer Caroline Soares & Maximino Reyes Umaña, 2019. "Path Dependence and Social Network Analysis on Evolutionary Dynamics of Tourism in Coastal Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Despoina Aktsoglou & Georgios Gaidajis, 2020. "A Case Study on Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Spatial Entities with Anthropogenic Activities: The National Park of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Onur Selcuk & Hatice Karakas & Beykan Cizel & Emre Ipekci Cetin, 2023. "How does tourism affect protected areas?: A multi-criteria decision making application in UNESCO natural heritage sites," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(2), pages 1923-1944, June.
    11. Ionica Oncioiu & Iustin Priescu, 2022. "The Use of Virtual Reality in Tourism Destinations as a Tool to Develop Tourist Behavior Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, April.
    12. Rannveig Ólafsdóttir & Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir, 2020. "Public Perception of Wilderness in Iceland," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Ana Beatriz Mateos & Felipe Leco & Antonio Pérez, 2020. "Visitors’ Perception of the Overcrowding of a Protected Natural Area: A Case Applied to the Natural Reserve “ Garganta de los Infiernos ” (Caceres, Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Rannveig Ólafsdóttir, 2020. "The Role of Public Participation for Determining Sustainability Indicators for Arctic Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Zhixue Liao & Maozhu Jin & Peiyu Ren & Yuyan Luo, 2014. "Research on Scenic Spot’s Sustainable Development Based on a SD Model: A Case Study of the Jiuzhai Valley," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-13, July.
    16. Juutinen, Artti & Mitani, Yohei & Mäntymaa, Erkki & Shoji, Yasushi & Siikamäki, Pirkko & Svento, Rauli, 2011. "Combining ecological and recreational aspects in national park management: A choice experiment application," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1231-1239, April.
    17. Michaël Virgil Bishop & Rannveig Ólafsdóttir & Þorvarður Árnason, 2022. "Tourism, Recreation and Wilderness: Public Perceptions of Conservation and Access in the Central Highland of Iceland," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    18. Yue, Tian-Xiang & Tian, Yong-Zhong & Liu, Ji-Yuan & Fan, Ze-Meng, 2008. "Surface modeling of human carrying capacity of terrestrial ecosystems in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 168-180.
    19. Haifeng Luo & Bor-Shuenn Chiou, 2021. "Framing the Hierarchy of Cultural Tourism Attractiveness of Chinese Historic Districts under the Premise of Landscape Conservation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, February.
    20. Eunice Lopes & Noelia Araújo-Vila & André Riani Costa Perinotto & Lucília Cardoso, 2022. "Tourism and Land Planning in Natural Spaces: Bibliometric Approach to the Structure of Scientific Concepts," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:367-:d:529029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.