IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i3p301-d517427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Circuitscape in Julia: Empowering Dynamic Approaches to Connectivity Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Kimberly R. Hall

    (North America Science, The Nature Conservancy, Haslett, MI 48840, USA)

  • Ranjan Anantharaman

    (MIT Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA)

  • Vincent A. Landau

    (Conservation Science Partners, Inc., Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA)

  • Melissa Clark

    (Center for Resilience Science, The Nature Conservancy, Boston, MA 02111, USA)

  • Brett G. Dickson

    (Conservation Science Partners, Inc., Truckee, CA 96161, USA
    Landscape Conservation Initiative, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA)

  • Aaron Jones

    (The Nature Conservancy, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA)

  • Jim Platt

    (North America Science, The Nature Conservancy, Minneapolis, MN 55124, USA)

  • Alan Edelman

    (MIT Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA)

  • Viral B. Shah

    (Julia Computing, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA)

Abstract

The conservation field is experiencing a rapid increase in the amount, variety, and quality of spatial data that can help us understand species movement and landscape connectivity patterns. As interest grows in more dynamic representations of movement potential, modelers are often limited by the capacity of their analytic tools to handle these datasets. Technology developments in software and high-performance computing are rapidly emerging in many fields, but uptake within conservation may lag, as our tools or our choice of computing language can constrain our ability to keep pace. We recently updated Circuitscape, a widely used connectivity analysis tool developed by Brad McRae and Viral Shah, by implementing it in Julia, a high-performance computing language. In this initial re-code (Circuitscape 5.0) and later updates, we improved computational efficiency and parallelism, achieving major speed improvements, and enabling assessments across larger extents or with higher resolution data. Here, we reflect on the benefits to conservation of strengthening collaborations with computer scientists, and extract examples from a collection of 572 Circuitscape applications to illustrate how through a decade of repeated investment in the software, applications have been many, varied, and increasingly dynamic. Beyond empowering continued innovations in dynamic connectivity, we expect that faster run times will play an important role in facilitating co-production of connectivity assessments with stakeholders, increasing the likelihood that connectivity science will be incorporated in land use decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Kimberly R. Hall & Ranjan Anantharaman & Vincent A. Landau & Melissa Clark & Brett G. Dickson & Aaron Jones & Jim Platt & Alan Edelman & Viral B. Shah, 2021. "Circuitscape in Julia: Empowering Dynamic Approaches to Connectivity Assessment," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:301-:d:517427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/301/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/301/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baumann, Matthias & Kamp, Johannes & Pötzschner, Florian & Bleyhl, Benjamin & Dara, Andrey & Hankerson, Brett & Prishchepov, Alexander V. & Schierhorn, Florian & Müller, Daniel & Hölzel, Norbert & Krä, 2020. "Declining human pressure and opportunities for rewilding in the steppes of Eurasia," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(9), pages 1058-1070.
    2. Megan K. Jennings & Katherine A. Zeller & Rebecca L. Lewison, 2020. "Supporting Adaptive Connectivity in Dynamic Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Megan K. Jennings & Emily Haeuser & Diane Foote & Rebecca L. Lewison & Erin Conlisk, 2020. "Planning for Dynamic Connectivity: Operationalizing Robust Decision-Making and Prioritization Across Landscapes Experiencing Climate and Land-Use Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Katherine A. Zeller & Rebecca Lewison & Robert J. Fletcher & Mirela G. Tulbure & Megan K. Jennings, 2020. "Understanding the Importance of Dynamic Landscape Connectivity," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Rebecca K. Runting & Stuart Phinn & Zunyi Xie & Oscar Venter & James E. M. Watson, 2020. "Opportunities for big data in conservation and sustainability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-4, December.
    6. Jeffrey M. Perkel, 2019. "Julia: come for the syntax, stay for the speed," Nature, Nature, vol. 572(7767), pages 141-142, August.
    7. Matthew J. Struebig & Matthew Linkie & Nicolas J. Deere & Deborah J. Martyr & Betty Millyanawati & Sally C. Faulkner & Steven C. Le Comber & Fachruddin M. Mangunjaya & Nigel Leader-Williams & Jeanne E, 2018. "Addressing human-tiger conflict using socio-ecological information on tolerance and risk," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erin K. Buchholtz & Michael S. O’Donnell & Julie A. Heinrichs & Cameron L. Aldridge, 2023. "Temporal Patterns of Structural Sagebrush Connectivity from 1985 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Megan K. Jennings & Katherine A. Zeller & Rebecca L. Lewison, 2021. "Dynamic Landscape Connectivity Special Issue Editorial," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-2, May.
    3. Ekaterina Dolbunova & Alexandre Lucquin & T. Rowan McLaughlin & Manon Bondetti & Blandine Courel & Ester Oras & Henny Piezonka & Harry K. Robson & Helen Talbot & Kamil Adamczak & Konstantin Andreev & , 2023. "The transmission of pottery technology among prehistoric European hunter-gatherers," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(2), pages 171-183, February.
    4. Weerasena, Lakmali & Shier, Douglas & Tonkyn, David & McFeaters, Mark & Collins, Christopher, 2023. "A sequential approach to reserve design with compactness and contiguity considerations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Megan K. Jennings & Katherine A. Zeller & Rebecca L. Lewison, 2021. "Dynamic Landscape Connectivity Special Issue Editorial," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-2, May.
    2. Drielsma, Michael J. & Love, Jamie & Taylor, Subhashni & Thapa, Rajesh & Williams, Kristen J., 2022. "General Landscape Connectivity Model (GLCM): a new way to map whole of landscape biodiversity functional connectivity for operational planning and reporting," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 465(C).
    3. Prishchepov, Alexander V. & Ponkina, Elena V. & Sun, Zhanli & Bavorova, Miroslava & Yekimovskaja, Olga A., 2021. "Revealing the intentions of farmers to recultivate abandoned farmland: A case study of the Buryat Republic in Russia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Danilo Urzedo & Zarrin Tasnim Sworna & Andrew J. Hoskins & Cathy J. Robinson, 2024. "AI chatbots contribute to global conservation injustices," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Zimmerer, Karl S. & Olivencia, Yolanda Jiménez & Rodríguez, Laura Porcel & López-Estébanez, Nieves & Álvarez, Fernando Allende & Olmo, Rafael Mata & Ochoa, Carolina Yacamán & Pulpón, Ángel Raúl Ruiz &, 2022. "Assessing social-ecological connectivity of agricultural landscapes in Spain: Resilience implications amid agricultural intensification trends and urbanization," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. André Fonseca & Vera Zina & Gonçalo Duarte & Francisca C. Aguiar & Patricia María Rodríguez-González & Maria Teresa Ferreira & Maria Rosário Fernandes, 2021. "Riparian Ecological Infrastructures: Potential for Biodiversity-Related Ecosystem Services in Mediterranean Human-Dominated Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Simone Valeri & Laura Zavattero & Giulia Capotorti, 2021. "Ecological Connectivity in Agricultural Green Infrastructure: Suggested Criteria for Fine Scale Assessment and Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Molly E. Brown, 2021. "Metrics to Accelerate Private Sector Investment in Sustainable Development Goal 2—Zero Hunger," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-6, May.
    9. Yi Bao & Zhou Huang & Han Wang & Ganmin Yin & Xiao Zhou & Yong Gao, 2023. "High‐resolution quantification of building stock using multi‐source remote sensing imagery and deep learning," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 350-361, February.
    10. Katherine A. Zeller & Rebecca Lewison & Robert J. Fletcher & Mirela G. Tulbure & Megan K. Jennings, 2020. "Understanding the Importance of Dynamic Landscape Connectivity," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Ann Hope Ruzow Holland, 2022. "If all planning is local, how are we going to save tomorrow? Ten pragmatic lessons from the field," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(1), pages 177-192, March.
    12. I. Wayan Susi Dharmawan & Nur Muhammad Heriyanto & Titiek Setyawati & Marfuah Wardani & Adi Susilo & Raden Garsetiasih & Reny Sawitri & Denny & Vivi Yuskianti & Endang Karlina & Mariana Takandjandji &, 2023. "The Vegetation Composition and Carbon Stock of Old Shrub Typology to Support the Rehabilitation Program in Sumatra and Kalimantan Islands, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Kunegel-Lion, Mélodie & Neilson, Eric W. & Mansuy, Nicolas & Goodsman, Devin W., 2022. "Habitat quality does not predict animal population abundance on frequently disturbed landscapes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 469(C).
    14. Yiwen Zeng & Rebecca K. Runting & James E. M. Watson & Luis Roman Carrasco, 2022. "Telecoupled environmental impacts are an obstacle to meeting the sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 76-82, February.
    15. Manuel Sánchez-Fernández & Juan Miguel Barrigón Morillas & David Montes González & José Juan de Sanjosé Blasco, 2022. "Impact of Roads on Environmental Protected Areas: Analysis and Comparison of Metrics for Assessing Habitat Fragmentation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    16. Münevver Turanlı & Ünal Halit Özden, 2023. "A New Programming Language for Data Science: Julia," EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(38), pages 223-241, June.
    17. Yaodan Zhang & Fei Li & Kai Li & Laiding Sun & Haijuan Yang, 2022. "The Influence of Space Transformation of Land Use on Function Transformation and the Regional Differences in Shaanxi Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Erin K. Buchholtz & Michael S. O’Donnell & Julie A. Heinrichs & Cameron L. Aldridge, 2023. "Temporal Patterns of Structural Sagebrush Connectivity from 1985 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, June.
    19. Fernando Garrigós-Simón & Silvia Sanz-Blas & Yeamduan Narangajavana & Daniela Buzova, 2021. "The Nexus between Big Data and Sustainability: An Analysis of Current Trends and Developments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1, June.
    20. Qaisar Ali & Hakimah Yaacob & Shazia Parveen & Zaki Zaini, 2021. "Big data and predictive analytics to optimise social and environmental performance of Islamic banks," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 616-632, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:301-:d:517427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.