IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v16y2023i3p139-d1075125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multidimensional View of Intellectual Capital and Dynamic Innovative Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Mostafa A. Ali

    (Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia)

  • Nazimah Hussin

    (Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia)

  • Hakeem Hammood Flayyih

    (College of Administration and Economics, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10011, Iraq)

  • Hossam Haddad

    (Business Faculty, Zarqa University, Zarqa 11831, Jordan)

  • Nidal Mahmoud Al-Ramahi

    (Business Faculty, Zarqa University, Zarqa 11831, Jordan)

  • Tareq Hammad Almubaydeen

    (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Zarqa University, Zarqa 11831, Jordan)

  • Sahraa Anwer Hussein

    (Institute of Medical Technology AL-Mansur, Middle Technical University, Baghdad 10011, Iraq)

  • Areej Saad Hasan Abunaila

    (College of Administration and Economics, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10011, Iraq)

Abstract

A review of the literature on intellectual capital development was conducted using systemic criteria for the inclusion of relevant studies. The concepts behind the ideas explored in the present study were discussed in respect to the subject matter. Examining the past state of the art in the intellectual capital sector for achieving high levels of innovation performance provided a multidimensional picture of intellectual capital, innovation performance, and dynamic capabilities. The present review was designed to illustrate the correlation between intellectual capital and innovation performance, as well as the role of dynamic capabilities in moderating the relationship between these constructs. Accordingly, we presented an extensive discussion on the relevant fundamental theoretical perspectives of contingency and resource-based views to provide an in-depth understanding of the abovementioned correlation. Finally, the conceptual framework was illustrated.

Suggested Citation

  • Mostafa A. Ali & Nazimah Hussin & Hakeem Hammood Flayyih & Hossam Haddad & Nidal Mahmoud Al-Ramahi & Tareq Hammad Almubaydeen & Sahraa Anwer Hussein & Areej Saad Hasan Abunaila, 2023. "A Multidimensional View of Intellectual Capital and Dynamic Innovative Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-28, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:139-:d:1075125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/3/139/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/16/3/139/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed Elsetouhi & Ibrahim Elbeltagi & Mohamed Yacine Haddoud, 2015. "Intellectual Capital And Innovations: Is Organisational Capital A Missing Link In The Service Sector?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(02), pages 1-29.
    2. Samina Karim & Laurence Capron, 2016. "Reconfiguration: Adding, redeploying, recombining and divesting resources and business units," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(13), pages 54-62, December.
    3. Makkonen, Hannu & Pohjola, Mikko & Olkkonen, Rami & Koponen, Aki, 2014. "Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2707-2719.
    4. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Organizational culture and performance measurement systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 77-103, January.
    5. Enkel, Ellen & Sagmeister, Veronika, 2020. "External corporate venturing modes as new way to develop dynamic capabilities," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 96.
    6. Sohvi Heaton & Donald S Siegel & David J Teece, 2019. "Universities and innovation ecosystems: a dynamic capabilities perspective," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(4), pages 921-939.
    7. Mike Tayles & Richard H. Pike & Saudah Sofian, 2007. "Intellectual capital, management accounting practices and corporate performance," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(4), pages 522-548, July.
    8. Ferreira, Jorge & Coelho, Arnaldo & Moutinho, Luiz, 2020. "Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    9. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570710762575 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Robin Fincham & Robin Roslender, 2003. "Intellectual capital accounting as management fashion: a review and critique," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 781-795.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jasna Prester, 2023. "Operating and Dynamic Capabilities and Their Impact on Operating and Business Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asiaei, Kaveh & Jusoh, Ruzita, 2017. "Using a robust performance measurement system to illuminate intellectual capital," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 1-19.
    2. Tatiana Garanina & Henri Hussinki & Johannes Dumay, 2021. "Accounting for intangibles and intellectual capital: a literature review from 2000 to 2020," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5111-5140, December.
    3. Hoang Thanh Nhon, 2021. "Exploring the Mediating Role of The Balance Use of the Performance Measurement System on the Relationship Between Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(2), pages 145-158, December.
    4. Mostafa A. Ali & Nazimah Hussin & Hossam Haddad & Reem Al-Araj & Ibtihal A. Abed, 2021. "Intellectual Capital and Innovation Performance: Systematic Literature Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.
    5. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:11-17 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Mostafa A. Ali & Nazimah Hussin & Hossam Haddad & Dina Alkhodary & Ahmad Marei, 2021. "Dynamic Capabilities and Their Impact on Intellectual Capital and Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-32, September.
    7. Yu Sun & Xiaobo Xu & Haiqing Yu & Hecheng Wang, 2022. "Impact of value co‐creation in the artificial intelligence innovation ecosystem on competitive advantage and innovation intelligibility," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 474-488, May.
    8. Utz Schäffer & Matthias D. Mahlendorf & Jochen Rehring, 2014. "Does the Interactive Use of Headquarter Performance Measurement Systems in Foreign Subsidiaries Endanger the Potential to Profit from Local Relationships?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 24(1), pages 21-38, March.
    9. Nebojša Janićijević, 2013. "Matching Compensation System With The Type Of Organizational Culture," Serbian Association of Economists Journal, SAE - Serbian Association of Economists, issue 5-6, pages 309-324, September.
    10. Smith, Julia A. & England, Claire, 2019. "An ethnographic study of culture and performance in the UK lingerie industry," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 241-258.
    11. FeCheng Ma & Farhan Khan & Kashif Ullah Khan & Si XiangYun, 2021. "Investigating the Impact of Information Technology, Absorptive Capacity, and Dynamic Capabilities on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    12. Matt Grimes, 2010. "Strategic Sensemaking within Funding Relationships: The Effects of Performance Measurement on Organizational Identity in the Social Sector," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 763-783, July.
    13. Gavin M Schwarz & Karin Sanders & Dave Bouckenooghe, 2020. "In the driving seat: Executive’s perceived control over environment," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(2), pages 317-342, May.
    14. A. E. Rodríguez Salazar & M. A. Domínguez-Crespo & A. M. Torres-Huerta & A. I. Licona-Aguilar & A. Nivón-Pellón & V. N. Orta-Guzmán, 2021. "Analysis of the Dynamical Capabilities into the Public Research Institutes to Their Strategic Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Chen, Jian-xun & Zhang, Bo & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush & Budhwar, Pawan & Tan, Hui, 2022. "Demystifying the non-linear effect of high commitment work systems (HCWS) on firms’ strategic intention of exploratory innovation: An extended resource-based view," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    16. Hongyi Mao & Zongjun Wang & Lin Yi, 2021. "Does Entrepreneurial Orientation Lead to Successful Sustainable Innovation? The Evidence from Chinese Environmentally Friendly Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Sikandar Ali Qalati & Dragana Ostic & Gu Shuibin & Fan Mingyue, 2022. "A mediated–moderated model for social media adoption and small and medium‐sized enterprise performance in emerging countries," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 846-861, April.
    18. Anja Heinicke, 2018. "Performance measurement systems in small and medium-sized enterprises and family firms: a systematic literature review," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 457-502, February.
    19. Wang, Yonggui & Hong, Aoran & Li, Xia & Gao, Jia, 2020. "Marketing innovations during a global crisis: A study of China firms’ response to COVID-19," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 214-220.
    20. Habersam, Michael & Piber, Martin & Skoog, Matti, 2013. "Knowledge balance sheets in Austrian universities: The implementation, use, and re-shaping of measurement and management practices," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 319-337.
    21. Ge Zhang & Yuxiang Gao & Gaoyong Li, 2023. "Research on Digital Transformation and Green Technology Innovation—Evidence from China’s Listed Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:139-:d:1075125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.