IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i7p322-d593076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Neural Network Monte Carlo Approximation for Expected Utility Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Yichen Zhu

    (Department of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, Western University, London, ON N6A5B7, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Marcos Escobar-Anel

    (Department of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, Western University, London, ON N6A5B7, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

This paper proposes an approximation method to create an optimal continuous-time portfolio strategy based on a combination of neural networks and Monte Carlo, named NNMC. This work is motivated by the increasing complexity of continuous-time models and stylized facts reported in the literature. We work within expected utility theory for portfolio selection with constant relative risk aversion utility. The method extends a recursive polynomial exponential approximation framework by adopting neural networks to fit the portfolio value function. We developed two network architectures and explored several activation functions. The methodology was applied on four settings: a 4/2 stochastic volatility (SV) model with two types of market price of risk, a 4/2 model with jumps, and an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck 4/2 model. In only one case, the closed-form solution was available, which helps for comparisons. We report the accuracy of the various settings in terms of optimal strategy, portfolio performance and computational efficiency, highlighting the potential of NNMC to tackle complex dynamic models.

Suggested Citation

  • Yichen Zhu & Marcos Escobar-Anel, 2021. "A Neural Network Monte Carlo Approximation for Expected Utility Theory," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:322-:d:593076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/7/322/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/7/322/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael W. Brandt & Amit Goyal & Pedro Santa-Clara & Jonathan R. Stroud, 2005. "A Simulation Approach to Dynamic Portfolio Choice with an Application to Learning About Return Predictability," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(3), pages 831-873.
    2. Yuyang Cheng & Marcos Escobar-Anel, 2021. "Optimal investment strategy in the family of 4/2 stochastic volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(10), pages 1723-1751, October.
    3. Zhu, Yichen & Escobar-Anel, Marcos, 2022. "Polynomial affine approach to HARA utility maximization with applications to OrnsteinUhlenbeck 4/2 models," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 418(C).
    4. Fei Cong & Cornelis W. Oosterlee, 2017. "Accurate and Robust Numerical Methods for the Dynamic Portfolio Management Problem," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 49(3), pages 433-458, March.
    5. Holger Kraft, 2005. "Optimal portfolios and Heston's stochastic volatility model: an explicit solution for power utility," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 303-313.
    6. Jain, Shashi & Oosterlee, Cornelis W., 2015. "The Stochastic Grid Bundling Method: Efficient pricing of Bermudan options and their Greeks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 269(C), pages 412-431.
    7. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt43n1k4jb, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    8. Cvitanic, Jaksa & Goukasian, Levon & Zapatero, Fernando, 2003. "Monte Carlo computation of optimal portfolios in complete markets," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 971-986, April.
    9. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-147.
    10. Jérôme B. Detemple & Ren Garcia & Marcel Rindisbacher, 2003. "A Monte Carlo Method for Optimal Portfolios," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(1), pages 401-446, February.
    11. Christian Flor & Linda Larsen, 2014. "Robust portfolio choice with stochastic interest rates," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 243-265, May.
    12. Chiu, Mei Choi & Wong, Hoi Ying, 2013. "Optimal investment for an insurer with cointegrated assets: CRRA utility," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 52-64.
    13. Heston, Steven L, 1993. "A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 327-343.
    14. Liu, Jun & Pan, Jun, 2003. "Dynamic derivative strategies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 401-430, September.
    15. Chen, Shun & Ge, Lei, 2021. "A learning-based strategy for portfolio selection," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 936-942.
    16. Marcos Escobar‐Anel & Zhenxian Gong, 2020. "The mean‐reverting 4/2 stochastic volatility model: Properties and financial applications," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(5), pages 836-856, September.
    17. Merton, Robert C, 1969. "Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(3), pages 247-257, August.
    18. M. Escobar & D. Neykova & R. Zagst, 2017. "HARA utility maximization in a Markov-switching bond–stock market," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(11), pages 1715-1733, November.
    19. Li, Yuying & Forsyth, Peter A., 2019. "A data-driven neural network approach to optimal asset allocation for target based defined contribution pension plans," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 189-204.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhu, Yichen & Escobar-Anel, Marcos, 2022. "Polynomial affine approach to HARA utility maximization with applications to OrnsteinUhlenbeck 4/2 models," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 418(C).
    2. Yichen Zhu & Marcos Escobar-Anel & Matt Davison, 2023. "A Polynomial-Affine Approximation for Dynamic Portfolio Choice," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(3), pages 1177-1213, October.
    3. Farina Weiss, 2021. "A numerical approach to solve consumption-portfolio problems with predictability in income, stock prices, and house prices," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 93(1), pages 33-81, February.
    4. Matt Davison & Marcos Escobar-Anel & Yichen Zhu, 2022. "Optimal market completion through financial derivatives with applications to volatility risk," Papers 2202.08148, arXiv.org.
    5. Rongju Zhang & Nicolas Langren'e & Yu Tian & Zili Zhu & Fima Klebaner & Kais Hamza, 2018. "Local Control Regression: Improving the Least Squares Monte Carlo Method for Portfolio Optimization," Papers 1803.11467, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2018.
    6. Simon Lysbjerg Hansen, 2005. "A Malliavin-based Monte-Carlo Approach for Numerical Solution of Stochastic Control Problems: Experiences from Merton's Problem," Computing in Economics and Finance 2005 391, Society for Computational Economics.
    7. Chenxu Li & Olivier Scaillet & Yiwen Shen, 2020. "Wealth Effect on Portfolio Allocation in Incomplete Markets," Papers 2004.10096, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    8. Yumo Zhang, 2023. "Utility maximization in a stochastic affine interest rate and CIR risk premium framework: a BSDE approach," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 46(1), pages 97-128, June.
    9. Legendre, François & Togola, Djibril, 2016. "Explicit solutions to dynamic portfolio choice problems: A continuous-time detour," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 627-641.
    10. Escobar-Anel, Marcos & Gollart, Maximilian & Zagst, Rudi, 2022. "Closed-form portfolio optimization under GARCH models," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    11. Chenxu Li & O. Scaillet & Yiwen Shen, 2020. "Decomposition of Optimal Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Wealth-Dependent Utilities in Incomplete Markets," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 20-22, Swiss Finance Institute.
    12. Marcos Escobar-Anel & Harold A. Moreno-Franco, 2019. "Dynamic portfolio strategies under a fully correlated jump-diffusion process," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 421-453, September.
    13. Cheng, Yuyang & Escobar-Anel, Marcos, 2023. "A class of portfolio optimization solvable problems," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    14. Simon Ellersgaard, 2019. "On the Numerical Solution of Mertonian Control Problems: A Survey of the Markov Chain Approximation Method for the Working Economist," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 54(3), pages 1179-1211, October.
    15. Björn Bick & Holger Kraft & Claus Munk, 2013. "Solving Constrained Consumption-Investment Problems by Simulation of Artificial Market Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 485-503, June.
    16. Rongju Zhang & Nicolas Langrené & Yu Tian & Zili Zhu & Fima Klebaner & Kais Hamza, 2019. "Skewed target range strategy for multiperiod portfolio optimization using a two-stage least squares Monte Carlo method," Post-Print hal-02909342, HAL.
    17. Larsen, Linda Sandris & Munk, Claus, 2012. "The costs of suboptimal dynamic asset allocation: General results and applications to interest rate risk, stock volatility risk, and growth/value tilts," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 266-293.
    18. Fei Cong & Cornelis W. Oosterlee, 2017. "Accurate and Robust Numerical Methods for the Dynamic Portfolio Management Problem," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 49(3), pages 433-458, March.
    19. Frank Bosserhoff & An Chen & Nils Sorensen & Mitja Stadje, 2021. "On the Investment Strategies in Occupational Pension Plans," Papers 2104.08956, arXiv.org.
    20. Calypso Herrera & Florian Krach & Pierre Ruyssen & Josef Teichmann, 2021. "Optimal Stopping via Randomized Neural Networks," Papers 2104.13669, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:322-:d:593076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.