IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v14y2021i2p67-d494542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Study on Risk Identification in the Process of Anti-Crisis Enterprise Management

Author

Listed:
  • Grygoriy Shamborovskyi

    (Department of International Economic Relations, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Sichovykh Striltsiv Street, 19, 79007 Lviv, Ukraine)

  • Yuliia Nehoda

    (Department of Finance, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Heroiv Oborony Street 15, 03041 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Nataliya Demidova

    (Department of Economics and Management, Federal State-Funded Educational Institution of Higher Education Don State Technical University, Shevchenko Street, 147, 346500 Shakhty, Russia)

  • Volodymyr Tarashchenko

    (Department of Audit and Economic Analysis, University of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine, Universytetska Street, 31, 08201 Irpin, Ukraine)

  • Svitlana Breus

    (Department of Management and Public Administration, Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design, Nemyrovycha-Danchenka Street, 2, 01011 Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

The study provides solutions for the scientific task related to the improvement of theoretical and development of methodological and applied principles, and the identification and evaluation of risks and threats as factors of anti-crisis management of the enterprises. Based on the developed concept of quantitative risk analysis, we constructed a fuzzy hierarchical model, which gives the possibility to get the estimates: risk factors; specific types of threats in the framework of a process; risk processes, identified in the anti-crisis management; and the integrative risk of anti-crisis management. Furthermore, the proposed model makes it possible to identify the threats that are the risks of the highest (catastrophe) layer. The fuzzy hierarchical model construction process includes the determination of linguistic variables, term-varieties, and universal sets for quantitative evaluation of figures and risks, the establishment of parameters of the membership functions for indicators and risks, the formation of fuzzy knowledge bases, the construction of a fuzzy hierarchical model in the MATLAB environment, the evaluation of adequacy of model based on the learning sample, the correction of a model, and the adoption of a resolution regarding its final variant. The use of the model in the anti-crisis enterprise management will provide the anti-crisis team with the possibility to give early warning of all negative factors, give their quantitative evaluation, and take them into account in the course of making managerial decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Grygoriy Shamborovskyi & Yuliia Nehoda & Nataliya Demidova & Volodymyr Tarashchenko & Svitlana Breus, 2021. "Modeling Study on Risk Identification in the Process of Anti-Crisis Enterprise Management," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:67-:d:494542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/2/67/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/2/67/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2018. "Management Information, Decision Sciences, and Financial Economics: A Connection," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 18-004/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    2. Thomas R. Berry†Stölzle & Jianren Xu, 2018. "Enterprise Risk Management and the Cost of Capital," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 85(1), pages 159-201, March.
    3. Birendra K. Mishra & Erik Rolland & Asish Satpathy & Michael Moore, 2019. "A framework for enterprise risk identification and management: the resource-based view," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(2), pages 162-188, January.
    4. Oliva, Fábio Lotti, 2016. "A maturity model for enterprise risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 66-79.
    5. Callahan, Carolyn & Soileau, Jared, 2017. "Does Enterprise risk management enhance operating performance?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 122-139.
    6. Najib Ullah Khan & Shuangjie Li & Muhammad Nabeel Safdar & Zia Ullah Khan, 2019. "The Role of Entrepreneurial Strategy, Network Ties, Human and Financial Capital in New Venture Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Kiran Javaria & Omar Masood & Fernando Garcia, 2020. "Strategies to manage the risks faced by consumers in developing e-commerce," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(4), pages 774-783, December.
    8. Fan, Huan & Li, Gang & Sun, Hongyi & Cheng, T.C.E., 2017. "An information processing perspective on supply chain risk management: Antecedents, mechanism, and consequences," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 63-75.
    9. Florio, Cristina & Leoni, Giulia, 2017. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The Italian case," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 56-74.
    10. Rashid Mehmood & Ahmed Imran Hunjra & Muhammad Irfan Chani, 2019. "The Impact of Corporate Diversification and Financial Structure on Firm Performance: Evidence from South Asian Countries," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Kiran Javaria & Omar Masood & Fernando Garcia, 2020. "Strategies to manage the risks faced by consumers in developing e-commerce," Post-Print hal-03271869, HAL.
    12. Philipp Lechner & Nadine Gatzert, 2018. "Determinants and value of enterprise risk management: empirical evidence from Germany," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 867-887, July.
    13. Jeffrey Cohen & Ganesh Krishnamoorthy & Arnold Wright, 2017. "Enterprise Risk Management and the Financial Reporting Process: The Experiences of Audit Committee Members, CFOs, and External Auditors," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 1178-1209, June.
    14. Fraser, John R.S. & Simkins, Betty J., 2016. "The challenges of and solutions for implementing enterprise risk management," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 689-698.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sorin Gabriel Anton & Anca Elena Afloarei Nucu, 2020. "Enterprise Risk Management: A Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Ben Kajwang, 2022. "Theoretical review of enterprise risk management culture drivers for insurance firms in Kenya," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(5), pages 210-217, July.
    3. José Ruiz-Canela López, 2021. "How Can Enterprise Risk Management Help in Evaluating the Operational Risks for a Telecommunications Company?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Jonek-Kowalska, Izabela & Nawrocki, Tomasz L., 2019. "Holistic fuzzy evaluation of operational risk in polish mining enterprises in a long-term and sectoral research perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Caraiman Adrian-Cosmin & Mates Dorel, 2020. "Risk management in corporate governance," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 182-201, July.
    6. Ivana Dvorski Lacković & Nataša Kurnoga & Danijela Miloš Sprčić, 2022. "Three-factor model of Enterprise Risk Management implementation: exploratory study of non-financial companies," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(2), pages 101-122, June.
    7. CARAIMAN Adrian, 2020. "The Risk Management Process In Corporate Guvernance," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 189-198, July.
    8. Przetacznik Sylwia, 2022. "Key Success Factors of Enterprise Risk Management Systems: Listed Polish Companies," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(1), pages 91-114, March.
    9. Rami Shaheen & Mehmet Ağa & Husam Rjoub & Ahmad Abualrub, 2020. "Investigation of the Pillars of Sustainability Risk Management as an Extension of Enterprise Risk Management on Palestinian Insurance Firms’ Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, June.
    10. Songling Yang & Muhammad Ishtiaq & Muhammad Anwar, 2018. "Enterprise Risk Management Practices and Firm Performance, the Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage and the Moderating Role of Financial Literacy," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Ena Pecina & Danijela Miloš Sprčić & Ivana Dvorski Lacković, 2022. "Qualitative Analysis of Enterprise Risk Management Systems in the Largest European Electric Power Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Lenka Syrová & Jindřich Špička, 2023. "Exploring the indirect links between enterprise risk management and the financial performance of SMEs," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(1), pages 1-27, March.
    13. Munther Al-Nimer & Sinan S. Abbadi & Ahmad Al-Omush & Habib Ahmad, 2021. "Risk Management Practices and Firm Performance with a Mediating Role of Business Model Innovation. Observations from Jordan," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Michele Gendelsky de Oliveira & Graça Azevedo & Jonas Oliveira, 2021. "The Relationship between the Company’s Value and the Tone of the Risk-Related Narratives: The Case of Portugal," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-28, May.
    15. Malik, Muhammad Farhan & Zaman, Mahbub & Buckby, Sherrena, 2020. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: Role of the risk committee," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    16. Gerda Zigiene & Egidijus Rybakovas & Rimgaile Vaitkiene, 2020. "Challenges in Applying Artificial Intelligence for Supply Chain Risk Management," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 299-318.
    17. Eduart Villanueva & María Antonia Nuñez & Izaias Martins, 2022. "Impact Of Risk Governance, Associated Practices and Tools on Enterprise Risk Management: Some Evidence from Colombia," Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, Universidad Católica de Colombia, vol. 14(1), pages 187-206, January.
    18. Monika Adamczyk & Alina Betlej, 2021. "Social determinants of digital exclusion in an ageing society. The case of Poland," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(3), pages 122-135, March.
    19. Jacek Woźniak & Alexandra Zbuchea, 2021. "Give or buy contexts and internet experience as a factor differentiating of readiness to provide different types of personal data in m-commerce," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(4), pages 53-67, June.
    20. Santos, Rachel Barbosa & de Oliveira, Ualison Rébula & Rocha, Henrique Martins, 2018. "Failure mapping for occupational safety management in the film and television industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 1-12.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:14:y:2021:i:2:p:67-:d:494542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.