IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p3742-d1074479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Two Types of Back Pillow Support on Transversus Abdominis and Internal Oblique Muscle Fatigue, Patient Satisfaction, and Discomfort Score during Prolonged Sitting

Author

Listed:
  • Rungthip Puntumetakul

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
    Research Center in Back, Neck, Other Joint Pain and Human Performance, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)

  • Thiwaphon Chatprem

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
    Research Center in Back, Neck, Other Joint Pain and Human Performance, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)

  • Pongsatorn Saiklang

    (Division of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Srinakharinwiroj University, Nakhon Nayok 26120, Thailand)

  • Arisa Leungbootnak

    (Human Movement Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand)

Abstract

Natural rubber is considered an economic plant in Thailand and is used to manufacture many products. Foam back pillows have proven to have various benefits for the lower back. However, no study has compared the effects of foam and rubber pillows. Therefore, the current study aimed to compare the efficacy of foam and rubber pillows on transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscle fatigue, patient satisfaction, and discomfort scores during 60 min of prolonged sitting. Thirty healthy participants were invited to the study and randomized into three sitting conditions over three consecutive days. The three groups were as follows: control, foam pillow, and rubber pillow. Our results revealed that the discomfort score increased with the sitting time in all three groups ( p < 0.05). The control group had the highest discomfort when compared to the rubber pillow group at 30 min (T4; p = 0.007) and 60 min (T7; p = 0.0001), as well as the foam pillow group at 60 min (T7; p = 0.0001). Participants were more satisfied sitting with the two types of back pillows at the initial time (T1; p = 0.0001) and at 60 min (T7; p = 0.0001) when compared with the control group. Furthermore, the participants were more satisfied with using rubber pillows rather than foam pillows throughout the sitting period ( p = 0.0001). The control group experienced more transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscle fatigue at 60 min (T7) of sitting compared to the initial time (T1) ( p = 0.038). Thus, sitting with pillow support can decrease deep trunk muscle fatigue, and using a pillow made from natural rubber may ensure greater satisfaction and less discomfort for the user.

Suggested Citation

  • Rungthip Puntumetakul & Thiwaphon Chatprem & Pongsatorn Saiklang & Arisa Leungbootnak, 2023. "The Effect of Two Types of Back Pillow Support on Transversus Abdominis and Internal Oblique Muscle Fatigue, Patient Satisfaction, and Discomfort Score during Prolonged Sitting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3742-:d:1074479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3742/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3742/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richelle Baker & Pieter Coenen & Erin Howie & Ann Williamson & Leon Straker, 2018. "The Short Term Musculoskeletal and Cognitive Effects of Prolonged Sitting During Office Computer Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Žiga Kozinc & Nejc Šarabon, 2020. "Shear-wave elastography for assessment of trapezius muscle stiffness: Reliability and association with low-level muscle activity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Yoko E. Fukumura & Julie McLaughlin Gray & Gale M. Lucas & Burcin Becerik-Gerber & Shawn C. Roll, 2021. "Worker Perspectives on Incorporating Artificial Intelligence into Office Workspaces: Implications for the Future of Office Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Gail Helena Nicolson & Catherine B. Hayes & Catherine D. Darker, 2021. "A Cluster-Randomised Crossover Pilot Feasibility Study of a Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Occupational Sedentary Behaviour in Professional Male Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Sara Moreira & Maria Begoña Criado & Maria Salomé Ferreira & Jorge Machado & Carla Gonçalves & Cristina Mesquita & Sofia Lopes & Paula Clara Santos, 2022. "The Effects of COVID-19 Lockdown on the Perception of Physical Activity and on the Perception of Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Computer Workers: Comparative Longitudinal Study Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Sara Moreira & Maria Begoña Criado & Maria Salomé Ferreira & Jorge Machado & Carla Gonçalves & Filipe Manuel Clemente & Cristina Mesquita & Sofia Lopes & Paula Clara Santos, 2022. "Positive Effects of an Online Workplace Exercise Intervention during the COVID-19 Pandemic on Quality of Life Perception in Computer Workers: A Quasi-Experimental Study Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Loreta Tobia & Pierpaolo Vittorini & Giulia Di Battista & Simona D’Onofrio & Giada Mastrangeli & Pietro Di Benedetto & Leila Fabiani, 2024. "Study on Psychological Stress Perceived among Employees in an Italian University during Mandatory and Voluntary Remote Working during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Martin Niedermeier & Elisabeth M. Weiss & Lisa Steidl-Müller & Martin Burtscher & Martin Kopp, 2020. "Acute Effects of a Short Bout of Physical Activity on Cognitive Function in Sport Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-13, May.
    8. Antimo Moretti & Fabrizio Menna & Milena Aulicino & Marco Paoletta & Sara Liguori & Giovanni Iolascon, 2020. "Characterization of Home Working Population during COVID-19 Emergency: A Cross-Sectional Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-13, August.
    9. Dengler, Katharina & Hiesinger, Karolin & Tisch, Anita, 2022. "Digital transformation: The role of computer use in employee health," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3742-:d:1074479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.