IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p2930-d1061150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Intensive Longitudinal Assessment Approach to Surveilling Trajectories of Burnout over the First Year of the COVID Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Cynthia X. Pan

    (NewYork-Presbyterian Queens Hospital, Flushing, NY 11355, USA
    Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA)

  • Robert Crupi

    (NewYork-Presbyterian Queens Hospital, Flushing, NY 11355, USA
    Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA)

  • Phyllis August

    (NewYork-Presbyterian Queens Hospital, Flushing, NY 11355, USA
    Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA)

  • Varuna Sundaram

    (NewYork-Presbyterian Queens Hospital, Flushing, NY 11355, USA
    Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA)

  • Allison A. Norful

    (School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA)

  • Joseph E. Schwartz

    (Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA)

  • Andrew S. Miele

    (Department of Psychology, St. John’s University, New York, NY 11439, USA)

  • R. Rhiannon Simons

    (Department of Psychology, St. John’s University, New York, NY 11439, USA)

  • Emilia E. Mikrut

    (Department of Psychology, St. John’s University, New York, NY 11439, USA)

  • Elizabeth Brondolo

    (Department of Psychology, St. John’s University, New York, NY 11439, USA)

Abstract

Frontline clinicians responding to the COVID-19 pandemic are at increased risk of burnout, but less is known about the trajectory of clinician burnout as caseloads increase and decrease. Personal and professional resources, including self-efficacy and hospital support, can attenuate the risk of burnout. Yet, empirical data documenting how burnout and resources changed as the pandemic waxed and waned are limited. This intensive longitudinal prospective study employed ecological momentary assessment methods to examine trajectories of burnout and resources over the pandemic’s first year in a New York City hospital. A 10-item survey was emailed every 5 days to frontline clinicians (physicians, nurses, and physician assistants). The primary outcome was a single-item validated measure of burnout; predictors included daily hospital COVID-19-related caseloads and personal and professional resources. Clinicians ( n = 398) completed the initial survey and an average of 12 surveys over the year. Initially, 45.3% of staff reported burnout; over the year, 58.7% reported burnout. Following the initial COVID peak, caseloads declined, and burnout levels declined. During the second wave of COVID, as caseloads increased and remained elevated and personal and professional resource levels decreased, burnout increased. This novel application of intensive longitudinal assessment enabled ongoing surveillance of burnout and permitted us to evaluate how fluctuations in caseload intensity and personal and professional resources related to burnout over time. The surveillance data support the need for intensified resource allocation during prolonged pandemics.

Suggested Citation

  • Cynthia X. Pan & Robert Crupi & Phyllis August & Varuna Sundaram & Allison A. Norful & Joseph E. Schwartz & Andrew S. Miele & R. Rhiannon Simons & Emilia E. Mikrut & Elizabeth Brondolo, 2023. "An Intensive Longitudinal Assessment Approach to Surveilling Trajectories of Burnout over the First Year of the COVID Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:2930-:d:1061150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2930/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2930/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grace, Matthew K. & VanHeuvelen, Jane S., 2019. "Occupational variation in burnout among medical staff: Evidence for the stress of higher status," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 199-208.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ieva Norkiene & Lina Jovarauskaite & Monika Kvedaraite & Encarl Uppal & Mandeep Kaur Phull & Heidi Chander & Kathryn Halford & Evaldas Kazlauskas, 2021. "‘Should I Stay, or Should I Go?’ Psychological Distress Predicts Career Change Ideation among Intensive Care Staff in Lithuania and the UK Amid COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-9, March.
    2. Tongtan Chantarat & Eva A. Enns & Rachel R. Hardeman & Patricia M. McGovern & Samuel L. Myers & Janette Dill, 2022. "Occupational Segregation And Hypertension Inequity: The Implication Of The Inverse Hazard Law Among Healthcare Workers," Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 267-282, December.
    3. Aureliusz Andrzej Kosendiak & Bartosz Adamczak & Sylwiusz Kontek & Zofia Kuźnik & Michał Roman & Michał Gostkowski & Arkadiusz Niedziółka, 2023. "Level of Physical Activity, Sleep Quality and Use of Personal Protective Equipment of Students at Wroclaw Medical University during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-28, January.
    4. Sabinne Marie Taranu & Adina Carmen Ilie & Ana-Maria Turcu & Ramona Stefaniu & Ioana Alexandra Sandu & Anca Iuliana Pislaru & Ioana Dana Alexa & Calina Anda Sandu & Tudor-Stefan Rotaru & Teodora Alexa, 2022. "Factors Associated with Burnout in Healthcare Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:2930-:d:1061150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.