IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i1p804-d1022140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Pig Manure and Rice Straw: Optimization of Process Parameters for Enhancing Biogas Production and System Stability

Author

Listed:
  • Pengjiao Tian

    (College of Food Science and Technology, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441053, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Binbin Gong

    (College of Life Science, Xingtai University, Xingtai 054001, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kaijian Bi

    (College of Food Science and Technology, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441053, China)

  • Yuxin Liu

    (Jiangxi Rural Energy and Enviroment Agency, Nanchang 330031, China)

  • Jing Ma

    (Jiangxi Rural Energy and Enviroment Agency, Nanchang 330031, China)

  • Xiqing Wang

    (College of Food Science and Technology, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441053, China)

  • Zhangsun Ouyang

    (Jiangxi Rural Energy and Enviroment Agency, Nanchang 330031, China)

  • Xian Cui

    (State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Engineering Research Center for Biomass Conversion, Ministry of Education, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to optimize the process parameters of the anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and rice straw to maximize methane production and system stability. In this study, batch experiments were conducted with different mixing ratios of pig manure and rice straw (1:0, 1:1, 1:5, 1:10, and 0:1), total solid concentrations (6%, 8%, 10%, 12%, and 14%), and inoculum accounts (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25%). The results show that a 1:5 mixing ratio of pig manure to rice straw, a 12% total solid content, and a 15% inoculum account yielded biogas up to 553.79 mL/g VS, which was a result of co-digestion increasing the cooperative index (CPI > 1). Likewise, the evolution of the pH and VFAs indicated that the co-digestion system was well-buffered and not easily inhibited by acidification or ammonia nitrogen. Moreover, the results of the Gompertz model’s fitting showed that the cumulative methane production, delay period, effective methane production time, and methane production rate under optimal conditions were significantly superior compared to the other groups employed.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengjiao Tian & Binbin Gong & Kaijian Bi & Yuxin Liu & Jing Ma & Xiqing Wang & Zhangsun Ouyang & Xian Cui, 2023. "Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Pig Manure and Rice Straw: Optimization of Process Parameters for Enhancing Biogas Production and System Stability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:1:p:804-:d:1022140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/804/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/804/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Zixin & Wang, Tengfei & Si, Buchun & Watson, Jamison & Zhang, Yuanhui, 2021. "Accelerating anaerobic digestion for methane production: Potential role of direct interspecies electron transfer," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maurizio Bressan & Elena Campagnoli & Carlo Giovanni Ferro & Valter Giaretto, 2023. "A Mass Balance-Based Method for the Anaerobic Digestion of Rice Straw," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Otton K. Roubinek & Anna Wilinska-Lisowska & Magdalena Jasinska & Andrzej G. Chmielewski & Krzysztof Czerwionka, 2023. "Production of Biogas from Distillation Residue as a Waste Material from the Distillery Industry in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Tsui, To-Hung & Zhang, Le & Zhang, Jingxin & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2022. "Engineering interface between bioenergy recovery and biogas desulfurization: Sustainability interplays of biochar application," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Zhang, Zexi & Ding, Ke & Ma, Xiaojun & Tang, Shuai & Wang, Zixin & Lu, Haifeng & Jiang, Weizhong & Si, Buchun, 2023. "Hydrodynamic design of down-flow packed bed reactor regulated the biohydrogen production and microbial enrichment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    4. Dimitra Theodosi Palimeri & Konstantina Papadopoulou & Apostolos G. Vlyssides & Anestis A. Vlysidis, 2023. "Improving the Biogas Production and Methane Yield in a UASB Reactor with the Addition of Sulfate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Yang, Min & Watson, Jamison & Wang, Zixin & Si, Buchun & Jiang, Weizhong & Zhou, Bo & Zhang, Yuanhui, 2022. "Understanding and design of two-stage fermentation: A perspective of interspecies electron transfer," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    6. Rubén Agregán & José M. Lorenzo & Manoj Kumar & Mohammad Ali Shariati & Muhammad Usman Khan & Abid Sarwar & Muhammad Sultan & Maksim Rebezov & Muhammad Usman, 2022. "Anaerobic Digestion of Lignocellulose Components: Challenges and Novel Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-24, November.
    7. Li, Lei & Xu, Ying & Dai, Xiaohu & Dai, Lingling, 2021. "Principles and advancements in improving anaerobic digestion of organic waste via direct interspecies electron transfer," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:1:p:804-:d:1022140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.