IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i15p6539-d1212049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of Privacy Enhancement Methods for Federated Learning in Healthcare Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Gu

    (School of Information Technology, King’s Own Institute, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Fariza Sabrina

    (School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia)

  • Zongwen Fan

    (College of Computer Science and Technology, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Shaleeza Sohail

    (College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) provides a distributed machine learning system that enables participants to train using local data to create a shared model by eliminating the requirement of data sharing. In healthcare systems, FL allows Medical Internet of Things (MIoT) devices and electronic health records (EHRs) to be trained locally without sending patients data to the central server. This allows healthcare decisions and diagnoses based on datasets from all participants, as well as streamlining other healthcare processes. In terms of user data privacy, this technology allows collaborative training without the need of sharing the local data with the central server. However, there are privacy challenges in FL arising from the fact that the model updates are shared between the client and the server which can be used for re-generating the client’s data, breaching privacy requirements of applications in domains like healthcare. In this paper, we have conducted a review of the literature to analyse the existing privacy and security enhancement methods proposed for FL in healthcare systems. It has been identified that the research in the domain focuses on seven techniques: Differential Privacy, Homomorphic Encryption, Blockchain, Hierarchical Approaches, Peer to Peer Sharing, Intelligence on the Edge Device, and Mixed, Hybrid and Miscellaneous Approaches. The strengths, limitations, and trade-offs of each technique were discussed, and the possible future for these seven privacy enhancement techniques for healthcare FL systems was identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Gu & Fariza Sabrina & Zongwen Fan & Shaleeza Sohail, 2023. "A Review of Privacy Enhancement Methods for Federated Learning in Healthcare Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-25, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:15:p:6539-:d:1212049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/15/6539/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/15/6539/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xin Gu & Karen Blackmore, 2017. "Characterisation of academic journals in the digital age," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1333-1350, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rezak Aziz & Soumya Banerjee & Samia Bouzefrane & Thinh Le Vinh, 2023. "Exploring Homomorphic Encryption and Differential Privacy Techniques towards Secure Federated Learning Paradigm," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Surbhi Bhatia Khan & Mohammed Alojail & Moteeb Al Moteri, 2023. "Advancing Disability Management in Information Systems: A Novel Approach through Bidirectional Federated Learning-Based Gradient Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chang, Yu-Wei, 2022. "Capability of non-English-speaking countries for securing a foothold in international journal publishing," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    2. Xin Gu & Karen Blackmore, 2017. "Quantitative study on Australian academic science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 1009-1035, November.
    3. Mina Moradzadeh & Shahram Sedghi & Sirous Panahi, 2023. "Towards a new paradigm for ‘journal quality’ criteria: a scoping review," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 279-321, January.
    4. Fabio Lorensi Canto & Adilson Luiz Pinto & Edson Mário Gavron & Marcos Talau, 2022. "Latin American and Caribbean journals indexed in Google Scholar Metrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(2), pages 763-783, February.
    5. Elías Sanz-Casado & Daniela Filippo & Rafael Aleixandre Benavent & Vidar Røeggen & Janne Pölönen, 2021. "Impact and visibility of Norwegian, Finnish and Spanish journals in the fields of humanities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(11), pages 9031-9049, November.
    6. Henrique Faverzani Drago & Gilnei Luiz Moura & Luciana Santos Costa Vieira Silva & Claudimar Pereira Veiga & Fabíola Kaczam & Luciana Peixoto Santa Rita & Wesley Vieira Silva, 2023. "Reviewing the relationship between organizational performance, dynamic capabilities and strategic behavior," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Terry Clark & Thomas Martin Key, 2021. "The methodologies of the marketing literature: mechanics, uses and craft," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 416-431, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:15:p:6539-:d:1212049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.