IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i12p6182-d1174695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the Conversation with Digital Health Assistants in Adherence Apps: Some Considerations on the Similarities and Differences with Familiar Medical Encounters

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Spagnolli

    (Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy
    Human Inspired Technologies Research Centre, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy)

  • Giulia Cenzato

    (Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy
    Human Inspired Technologies Research Centre, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy)

  • Luciano Gamberini

    (Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy
    Human Inspired Technologies Research Centre, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy)

Abstract

Digital health assistants (DHAs) are conversational agents incorporated into health systems’ interfaces, exploiting an intuitive interaction format appreciated by the users. At the same time, however, their conversational format can evoke interactional practices typical of health encounters with human doctors that might misguide the users. Awareness of the similarities and differences between novel mediated encounters and more familiar ones helps designers avoid unintended expectations and leverage suitable ones. Focusing on adherence apps, we analytically discuss the structure of DHA-patient encounters against the literature on physician-patient encounters and the specific affordances of DHAs. We synthesize our discussion into a design checklist and add some considerations about DHA with unconstrained natural language interfaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Spagnolli & Giulia Cenzato & Luciano Gamberini, 2023. "Modeling the Conversation with Digital Health Assistants in Adherence Apps: Some Considerations on the Similarities and Differences with Familiar Medical Encounters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:12:p:6182-:d:1174695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/12/6182/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/12/6182/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robinson, Jeffrey D., 2001. "Closing medical encounters: two physician practices and their implications for the expression of patients' unstated concerns," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 639-656, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allwood, Rebecca & Pilnick, Alison & O'Brien, Rebecca & Goldberg, Sarah & Harwood, Rowan H. & Beeke, Suzanne, 2017. "Should I stay or should I go? How healthcare professionals close encounters with people with dementia in the acute hospital setting," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 212-225.
    2. Park, Yujong, 2013. "Negotiating last-minute concerns in closing Korean medical encounters: The use of gaze, body and talk," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 176-191.
    3. Sterponi, Laura & Zucchermaglio, Cristina & Fatigante, Marilena & Alby, Francesca, 2019. "Structuring times and activities in the oncology visit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 211-222.
    4. Jin, Ying & Kim, Younhee, 2022. "Dietary advice in chronic care: Comparing traditional Chinese and western medicine practiced in mainland China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:12:p:6182-:d:1174695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.