IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4877-d795738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Two Diet and Exercise Approaches on Weight Loss and Health Outcomes in Obese Women

Author

Listed:
  • Brittanie Lockard

    (School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX 78209, USA)

  • Michelle Mardock

    (Exercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Jonathan M. Oliver

    (Exercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Mike Byrd

    (Exercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
    Byrd’s Eye Enterprises, Inc., Forney, TX 75126, USA)

  • Sunday Simbo

    (Exercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
    Center for Translational Research in Aging & Longevity, Human Clinical Research Facility, Department of Health & Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Andrew R. Jagim

    (Department of Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Onalaska, WI 54650, USA)

  • Julie Kresta

    (College of Education and Human Development, Texas A&M University Central-Texas, Killeen, TX 76549, USA)

  • Claire C. Baetge

    (Exercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Yanghoon Peter Jung

    (CJ CheilJedang, Suwon 16495, Korea)

  • Majid S. Koozehchian

    (Department of Kinesiology, Jacksonville State University, Jacksonville, AL 36265, USA)

  • Deepesh Khanna

    (Department of Foundational Sciences, Nova Southeastern University, Clearwater, FL 33759, USA)

  • Chris Rasmussen

    (Exercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Richard B. Kreider

    (Exercise & Sport Nutrition Lab, Human Clinical Research Facility, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

Abstract

Aim: To compare the efficacy of two popular weight loss approaches on weight loss, body composition, and markers of health in sedentary obese women. Methods: In total, 51 sedentary women (age 34.5 ± 7.7 yrs.; weight 90.0 ± 14.5 kg; BMI 34.0 ± 5.1 kg/m 2 ; 46.5 ± 7.0% fat) were matched and randomized to participate in the Weight Watchers ® Momentum™ (WW) or Curves ® (CV) Fitness and Weight Management program for 16 weeks. Participants in the WW group ( n = 27) were provided a point-based diet program, received weekly progress checks and counseling, and were encouraged to exercise. Participants in the CV group ( n = 24) followed a menu-based higher protein/low-fat diet (1200 kcal/d) for 1 week; 1500 kcal/d diet for 3 weeks; and 2000–2500 kcals/d for 2 weeks that was repeated three times (except the last segment) while participating in a supervised circuit-style resistance training program (3 d/wk). A general linear model (GLM) with repeated measures was used to analyze data and are presented as mean changes from baseline (mean [UL, LL]). Results: Supervised CV training resulted in greater amounts of vigorous and total physical activity. After 16 weeks, both groups lost weight (WW −6.1 [−7.8, −4.6], CV −4.9 [−6.2, −3.2] kg, p = 0.264). Participants in the CV group observed greater reductions in fat mass (WW −2.9 [−6.7, −0.2], CV −6.4 [−9.2, −3.6] kg, p = 0.081) and increases in lean mass (WW −2.5 [−4.3, −0.7], CV 1.3 [−0.6, 3.2] kg, p = 0.005) resulting in more favorable changes in percent body fat (WW −1.4 [−4.1, 1.2], CV −4.7 [−7.5, −1.8]%, p = 0.098). Both groups observed improvements in peak aerobic capacity and muscular endurance, although bench press lifting volume was greater in the CV group. Those in the CV group experienced a greater increase in HDLc and reduction in the CHL–HDLc ratio and triglycerides. Conclusion: Both interventions promoted weight loss and improvements in fitness and markers of health. The CV program, which included supervised resistance training and higher protein diet menus, promoted greater fat loss, increases in lean mass, and improvements in percent body fat and blood lipids. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, #NCT04372771, registered retrospectively 1 May 2020.

Suggested Citation

  • Brittanie Lockard & Michelle Mardock & Jonathan M. Oliver & Mike Byrd & Sunday Simbo & Andrew R. Jagim & Julie Kresta & Claire C. Baetge & Yanghoon Peter Jung & Majid S. Koozehchian & Deepesh Khanna &, 2022. "Comparison of Two Diet and Exercise Approaches on Weight Loss and Health Outcomes in Obese Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4877-:d:795738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4877/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4877/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marrero, D.G. & Palmer, K.N.B. & Phillips, E.O. & Miller-Kovach, K. & Foster, G.D. & Saha, C.K., 2016. "Comparison of commercial and self-initiated weight loss programs in people with prediabetes: A randomized control trial," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(5), pages 949-956.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pudney, Ellen V. & Himmelstein, Mary S. & Puhl, Rebecca M. & Foster, Gary D., 2020. "Distressed or not distressed? A mixed methods examination of reactions to weight stigma and implications for emotional wellbeing and internalized weight bias," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4877-:d:795738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.